Skip to content

Players can have the same pseudonym #3510

@Srborjaa

Description

@Srborjaa

Information

Full output of /ess version:

[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de Server: 1.15.2-R0.1-SNAPSHOT git-Paper-379 (MC: 1.15.2)
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de EssentialsX: 2.18.0.3
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de LuckPerms: 5.1.26
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de PlaceholderAPI: 2.10.6
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de EssentialsXChat: 2.18.0.3
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de EssentialsXSpawn: 2.18.0.3
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de Vault: 1.7.2-b107
[09:08:34 INFO]: Versión de Citizens: 2.0.27-SNAPSHOT (build 2058)

Server log: https://gist.github.com/Srborjaa/f06a0ef28f5b15b4ddd88d69b3572d03

EssentialsX config: https://gist.github.com/Srborjaa/e5a88b0b850d2aa48ffd749e958bae67

Details

Description
Players can have the same nick/pseudonym without getting the This nick is already in use error.

Steps to reproduce
Player 1: /nick JenniferMorrison (or another one): https://i.gyazo.com/d5751d1e7e76b59c50b85816be153481.png
Player 2: /nick JenniferMorrison (or another one): https://i.gyazo.com/bcf71681e16e21ee2a3d51f52855c740.png

Expected behavior
It is expected that the second player gets an error like this: https://i.gyazo.com/f49decdd52af72a8d637de52a9f4f872.png

Screenshots
Submitted with the steps.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bug: unconfirmedPotential bugs that need replicating to verify.

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions