[13604] Run GHA workflow tests on each PR#30975
Conversation
Added the first version of GHA workflow running workflow tests on opening and syncing of PRs See: Expensify#13604
runs -> run See: Expensify#13604
Added workflow_dispatch trigger See: Expensify#13604
Added PR event type of edited See: Expensify#13604
…un-workflow-tests-on-pr Run GHA workflow tests on each PR
Added step for Act installation See: Expensify#13604
Added step for Homebrew installation See: Expensify#13604
Updated step for Homebrew installation with post install commands See: Expensify#13604
Added some debug echoes See: Expensify#13604
Found existing Homebrew setup step See: Expensify#13604
Added step for setting the ACT_BINARY env variable See: Expensify#13604
Updated step for setting the ACT_BINARY to use the way proposed by GHA See: Expensify#13604
Updated step for running tests with debug echoes to get into what is the working dir See: Expensify#13604
Updated step for running tests by removing debug echoes See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for preDeploy after two of the jobs have been removed See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for testBuild after one of the messages have been updated See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for cherryPick after the way github token is passed to a step has changed See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for platformDeploy after 2 new steps have been added See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for finishReleaseCycle after 2 new steps have been added and the way the token is passed has changed See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for createNewVersion after new secrets have been added and the way the token is passed has changed See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for deploy after new secrets have been added and the way the token is passed has changed See: Expensify#13604
Fixed tests for lint after new steps have been added See: Expensify#13604
Run prettier See: Expensify#13604
Add quotes to satisfy linter See: Expensify#13604
|
@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
Removed strategy field from gha workflow See: Expensify#13604
|
welp. I'll ask for a volunteer in Slack |
|
hiya! you can assign it to me |
|
This is a test that |
|
The new workflow executes on PR events, when contents of |
| pull_request: | ||
| types: [opened, reopened, edited, synchronize] | ||
| branches-ignore: [staging, production] | ||
| paths: ['.github'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This workflow should have run in this PR also. But I don't see it here.
I think it might be our path. (ref here)
| paths: ['.github'] | |
| paths: ['.github/**'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, you're probably right
Updated the paths field in the workflow with the wildcard to match all files in .github directory and subdirectories See: Expensify#13604
Declares and defines actor value within the test See: Expensify#13604
|
Not sure why these 3 particular tests fail in GHA as all tests pass locally, need to investigate it some more |
…04-run-workflow-tests-on-pr # Conflicts: # .github/workflows/deploy.yml # .github/workflows/finishReleaseCycle.yml
Fixed platformDeploy workflow tests after recent changes in upstream See: Expensify#13604
Fixed authorChecklist workflow tests after recent changes in upstream See: Expensify#13604
Fixed deployBlocker workflow tests after recent changes in upstream See: Expensify#13604
Run prettier See: Expensify#13604
|
Looks good now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
dangrous
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One very not a blocker comment, otherwise looks good. Double checked this still runs well locally as well as on GH. Will let @AndrewGable take a last look!
| token: ${{ secrets.OS_BOTIFY_TOKEN }} | ||
|
|
||
| - uses: ./.github/actions/composite/setupGitForOSBotifyApp | ||
| - name: Setup Git for OSBotify |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - name: Setup Git for OSBotify | |
| - name: Setup git for OSBotify |
NAB - others are lowercase, ideally this should match
Changed step names containing git to have it in lowercase See: Expensify#13604
dangrous
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All yours, @AndrewGable !
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.4.4-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.4-3 🚀
|
Details
Added a new workflow that runs previously added GHA workflow tests on each PR (excluding PRs to
stagingandproduction)Fixed Issues
$ #13604 (comment)
Tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)myBool && <MyComponent />.src/languages/*files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)/** comment above it */thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop