Skip to content

fix: 31415 Input field on Login page gets white background after using auto-fill#32332

Merged
neil-marcellini merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
tienifr:fix/31415
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

fix: 31415 Input field on Login page gets white background after using auto-fill#32332
neil-marcellini merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
tienifr:fix/31415

Conversation

@tienifr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tienifr tienifr commented Dec 1, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #31415
PROPOSAL: #31415 (comment)

Tests

  1. staging.new.expenisfy.com
  2. On login page, enter email credentials using auto-fill function
  3. Email is entered without background
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

  1. staging.new.expenisfy.com
  2. On login page, enter email credentials using auto-fill function
  3. Email is entered without background
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS: mWeb Chrome
original-1F4A31B1-7136-4936-9F3D-0CE3F87AC142.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-12-01.at.14.10.13.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-12-01.at.14.14.05.mp4

@tienifr tienifr marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2023 07:17
@tienifr tienifr requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2023 07:17
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for a team December 1, 2023 07:17
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 1, 2023

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Comment thread web/index.html
}

/* Customizes the background and text colors for autofill inputs in Chrome */
input[chrome-autofilled],
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a comment here to explain why non-stand chrome-autofilled is used.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB, but yes I agree, and as you said earlier:

autofill is a standard. chrome-autofilled is not.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

parasharrajat commented Dec 1, 2023

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 6 56 06 PM

🔲 iOS / Chrome

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 6 05 09 PM jpeg

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 5 17 29 PM

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2023-12-01.at.5.05.19.PM.mov

🔲 Android / Chrome

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 7 24 47 PM

🔲 Android / native

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 5 29 44 PM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is one comment.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tienifr Let's get that comment so that it can be merged today.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bump @tienifr

@tienifr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Dec 4, 2023

updated

Comment thread web/index.html Outdated
Comment on lines +77 to +78
/* Chrome on iOS does not support the autofill pseudo class because it is a non-standard webkit feature.
We should rely on the chrome-autofilled property that being added to the input when users use auto-fill function */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment is wrong. autofill is a standard. chrome-autofilled & -webkit-autofill is not.

Suggested change
/* Chrome on iOS does not support the autofill pseudo class because it is a non-standard webkit feature.
We should rely on the chrome-autofilled property that being added to the input when users use auto-fill function */
/* Chrome on iOS use iOS's WKWebView, and WKWebView doesn't support non-standard webkit features. We have to rely on the chrome-autofilled attribute that being added to the input when users use auto-fill function */

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the suggestion, but also remove "that" here We have to rely on the chrome-autofilled attribute that being added => We have to rely on the chrome-autofilled attribute being added, also when users use auto-fill function => when users use auto-fill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from neil-marcellini December 4, 2023 07:46
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There is a pending suggestion also.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, good to go after we fix up the comment.

Comment thread web/index.html Outdated
Comment on lines +77 to +78
/* Chrome on iOS does not support the autofill pseudo class because it is a non-standard webkit feature.
We should rely on the chrome-autofilled property that being added to the input when users use auto-fill function */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the suggestion, but also remove "that" here We have to rely on the chrome-autofilled attribute that being added => We have to rely on the chrome-autofilled attribute being added, also when users use auto-fill function => when users use auto-fill

@tienifr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Dec 5, 2023

@neil-marcellini Fixed. Thank you

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tienifr The main comment suggestion is here #32332 (comment). @neil-marcellini suggested improvement over it. let's fix it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One NAB for the comment.

Comment thread web/index.html
}

/* Customizes the background and text colors for autofill inputs in Chrome */
input[chrome-autofilled],
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB, but yes I agree, and as you said earlier:

autofill is a standard. chrome-autofilled is not.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can fix the comment in a follow up.

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit a42894e into Expensify:main Dec 5, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.4.9-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.4.9-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 8, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.4.9-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants