Skip to content

PopoverWithMeasuredContent optimization#67035

Merged
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/popover-optimization
Aug 4, 2025
Merged

PopoverWithMeasuredContent optimization#67035
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/popover-optimization

Conversation

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jmusial jmusial commented Jul 24, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #67034

PROPOSAL:

Tests

Popover with measured content is used in various places across the whole app. For testing I picked 3 sample scenarios:

1. Dropdown button in Search Filters

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Reports
  3. Open any filter
  4. Filter can be selected or dismissed.

2. Worspaces 3 dots menu

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Workspaces
  3. Press 3 dots next to an existing workspace
  4. Any of the options can be chosen and works as expected

3. Reaction modal

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Reports
  3. Open a report
  4. Add a reaction to an action

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
0037.andorid.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
0037.android.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
0037.ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
0037.ios.safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
0037.desktop.chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
0037.desktop.native.mov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Comment on lines +24 to +25
// eslint-disable-next-line import/prefer-default-export
export type {PopoverWithMeasuredContentProps};
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can export it as default export to get rid of the eslint disable comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree

@jmusial jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 14:43
@jmusial jmusial requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2025 14:43
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from alitoshmatov and removed request for a team July 29, 2025 14:43
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

@alitoshmatov Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@jmusial jmusial changed the title Popover optimization POC PopoverWithMeasuredContent optimization Jul 30, 2025
@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Jul 31, 2025

hey @alitoshmatov will you have a time to take look @ this sometime soon ?

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 4, 2025

hey @alitoshmatov will you have a time to take look @ this sometime soon ?

Bump

@mountiny mountiny requested review from ZhenjaHorbach and removed request for alitoshmatov August 4, 2025 18:53
@mountiny
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mountiny commented Aug 4, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach please go ahead with the review

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 4, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
2025-08-04.22.01.33.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
2025-08-04.22.03.41.mov
iOS: HybridApp
2025-08-04.21.53.08.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
2025-08-04.21.50.09.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2025-08-04.21.45.37.mov
MacOS: Desktop
2025-08-04.21.45.37.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 4, 2025

Due to fast closing animation, we can see the screen change at the bottom under bottom nav on IOS after pressing Go to workspace on workspaces 3 dots menu

2025-08-04.21.56.56.mov

And the closing animation looks pretty fast on android on Dropdown button in Search Filters

2025-08-04.22.02.40.mov

But just checked on main
We have the same issues !

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall everything looks good !
so LGTM !

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny August 4, 2025 20:23
@mountiny mountiny merged commit 98b9987 into Expensify:main Aug 4, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 4, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@Pujan92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Aug 5, 2025

@jmusial I think there is an issue from this PR when 3 button navigation is enabled, we may need the correct bottom position.

issue1.webm

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 5, 2025

@Pujan92 will take a look

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 5, 2025

Cannot reproduce it on latest main
What device / android version are you using ?

3.button.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Confirm
Also works good

@Pujan92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Aug 5, 2025

Cannot reproduce it on latest main
What device / android version are you using ?

I am still seeing it on Pixel_7_Pro / android 14

Screenshot_1754411324

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 6, 2025

Ok, I can reproduce the issue on Pixel 7 Pro / Android 14. But it's not a regression from this PR. Been there before as well.

image

I can work on a fix, will just need an issue for it :)

@Pujan92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Aug 6, 2025

I am not sure of it but as I am not able to see that issue if I comment this part and render withPopoverWithMeasuredContentBase only, so I thought it is from this PR.

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 6, 2025

Interesting, I tested w/ those lines commented out and then on staging build and issue was visible in all cases. @ZhenjaHorbach can you retest as well plz ?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.90-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Aug 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.90-11 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@chrispader
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

chrispader commented Oct 2, 2025

@jmusial @mountiny this PR causes the ActionSheetAwareScrollView to not work anymore on iOS, because we don't measure the content anymore and therefore don't call the MEASURE_POPOVER action anymore:

actionSheetAwareScrollViewContext.transitionActionSheetState({
    type: ActionSheetAwareScrollView.Actions.MEASURE_POPOVER,
    payload: {
        popoverHeight: Math.floor(height),
    },
});

Since we need the measurement also for popovers on small screen width, i'm not sure whether we can keep this optimization in place. Maybe we can have a more optimized measuring logic for native platforms specifically, beacuse there we will never have these "sophisticated positioning schemas" (except for maybe on tablets)

This is the problem:

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.17.Pro.-.2025-09-30.at.15.02.21.mov

(Originally from #68640 (comment))

@jmusial do you want to work on fixing this, as you already worked on this PR?

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Oct 2, 2025

Hey @chrispader I understand that you're refering to to comments not shifting when bottom modal opens ?
I don't think we want that, coming from this slack comment

@chrispader
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey @chrispader I understand that you're refering to to comments not shifting when bottom modal opens ? I don't think we want that, coming from this slack comment

@jmusial sorry my bad, i missed that thread. So in the end, we only want to move the scrollable content, when we go from open keyboard to a modal/popover? No shifting animation to show the last comment on top of the popover anymore?

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Oct 2, 2025

No worries :)

AFAIU we only want to move comments when opening keyboard or editing, not when showing bottom docked modal on small screen, but let's maybe wait for @mountiny to confirm.

@mountiny
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mountiny commented Oct 2, 2025

Yeah, I think we only need to move it when the keyboard opens so that is also during comment editing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants