Skip to content

PopoverWithMeasuredContent optimization for mobile#68223

Merged
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/popover-optimization-v2
Sep 11, 2025
Merged

PopoverWithMeasuredContent optimization for mobile#68223
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/popover-optimization-v2

Conversation

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor

@jmusial jmusial commented Aug 8, 2025

Explanation of Change

On small screens PopoverWithMeasuredContent returns BottomDockedModal in the end. This fix returns BottomDockedModal earlier avoiding expensive position and measurement calculation logic.

Cotext:

This PR was reverted in connection to #68107, adding Videos and test scenario for that case.

Fixed Issues

$ #67034

PROPOSAL:

Tests

Popover with measured content is used in various places across the whole app. For testing I picked 3 sample scenarios:

1. Dropdown button in Search Filters

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Reports
  3. Open any filter
  4. Filter can be selected or dismissed.

2. Worspaces 3 dots menu

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Workspaces
  3. Press 3 dots next to an existing workspace
  4. Any of the options can be chosen and works as expected

3. Reaction modal

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Reports
  3. Open a report
  4. Add a reaction to an action

4. Revert testcase

  1. Open the app
  2. Navigate to a conversation and enter a message
  3. Send the message
  4. Edit the sent message
  5. After editing a message , the chat is scrolled down

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
0037.andorid.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
0037.android.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
0037.ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
0037.ios.safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
0037.desktop.chrome.mov

Revert testcase videos

Android: Native
Revert.-.android.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Revery.andorid.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
Revert.-ios.native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Revert.-ios.safari.mp4

@jmusial jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2025 09:01
@jmusial jmusial requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 09:01
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ZhenjaHorbach and removed request for a team August 18, 2025 09:01
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 18, 2025

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 18, 2025

Hey @ZhenjaHorbach this is pretty much unchanged from 1st PR... I cannot repro the bug that caused the revert, but not 100% sure how we should proceed here? Maybe get ad hoc builds and test again ?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 19, 2025

Hey @ZhenjaHorbach this is pretty much unchanged from 1st PR... I cannot repro the bug that caused the revert, but not 100% sure how we should proceed here? Maybe get ad hoc builds and test again ?

Actually I also couldn't reproduce this issue before
But good idea
Let's check on adhoc builds !

I will ask in Slack

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mollfpr has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 19, 2025

hey @jasperhuangg you were able to reproduce this issue. Can you check on ad-hoc build plz ?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 21, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screenrecorder-2025-08-21-13-35-04-238.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screenrecorder-2025-08-21-13-37-32-278.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios.MP4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.MP4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
web.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 21, 2025

Found this
But we have the same issue on staging also
When we go back the modal is still open
but then it closes with broken animation

2025-08-21.13.09.15.mp4

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 21, 2025

Hey @ZhenjaHorbach this is pretty much unchanged from 1st PR... I cannot repro the bug that caused the revert, but not 100% sure how we should proceed here? Maybe get ad hoc builds and test again ?

And in this PR I can't reproduce this issue also
But I hope we won't encounter with this issue again

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 21, 2025

Looks like we have a common issue with bottom bar on android
Which overlaps modals
But the same problem is in staging
And possible this problem is specific to specific devices

Снимок экрана 2025-08-21 в 14 00 45

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 22, 2025

Looks like we have a common issue with bottom bar on android Which overlaps modals But the same problem is in staging And possible this problem is specific to specific devices

Снимок экрана 2025-08-21 в 14 00 45

Ah, I was lookiung into this one the other day. I think this is caused by

AppAndFlow/react-native-safe-area-context#634

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 22, 2025

Looks like we have a common issue with bottom bar on android Which overlaps modals But the same problem is in staging And possible this problem is specific to specific devices
Снимок экрана 2025-08-21 в 14 00 45

Ah, I was lookiung into this one the other day. I think this is caused by

AppAndFlow/react-native-safe-area-context#634

Thanks for checking !
Actually yes
Looks similar 😅

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 22, 2025

Hi @m-natarajan,
Could you please take a look at this issue?

The original PR was reverted which caused this issue, and this new version includes a fix.
The tricky part is that we weren’t able to reproduce the issue before 😢
Could you try testing it using these builds?

It looks like you were able to reproduce the problem earlier here.

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 22, 2025

Found this But we have the same issue on staging also When we go back the modal is still open but then it closes with broken animation

2025-08-21.13.09.15.mp4

for this one looking if there is an ez fix now

EDIT: cannot repro :( this is android chrome right ?
any particular version ? @ZhenjaHorbach

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 22, 2025

Looks like we have a common issue with bottom bar on android Which overlaps modals But the same problem is in staging And possible this problem is specific to specific devices
Снимок экрана 2025-08-21 в 14 00 45

Ah, I was lookiung into this one the other day. I think this is caused by
AppAndFlow/react-native-safe-area-context#634

Thanks for checking ! Actually yes Looks similar 😅

Yeah, in the code the insets on bottom come as 0 from the lib :(

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Found this But we have the same issue on staging also When we go back the modal is still open but then it closes with broken animation
2025-08-21.13.09.15.mp4

for this one looking if there is an ez fix now

EDIT: cannot repro :( this is android chrome right ? any particular version ? @ZhenjaHorbach

No
It's ios web (iPhone 13)

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 22, 2025

Which ios version ? 18.6 seems ok ?
And what setting puts nav bar to the top in safari :D ?

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.13.-.2025-08-22.at.12.24.24.mp4

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Which ios version ? 18.6 seems ok ? And what setting puts nav bar to the top in safari :D ?

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.13.-.2025-08-22.at.12.24.24.mp4

I have a beta 26
Maybe this is the reason 😅

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Aug 27, 2025

Hey I'll be OOO till 08.09, during this time @blazejkustra will be monitoring this one.

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @m-natarajan, Could you please take a look at this issue?

The original PR was reverted which caused this issue, and this new version includes a fix. The tricky part is that we weren’t able to reproduce the issue before 😢 Could you try testing it using these builds?

It looks like you were able to reproduce the problem earlier here.

@m-natarajan
Friendly bump

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Sep 9, 2025

@mountiny
Could you please run adhoc builds for this?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2025

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2025

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #68223.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/68223/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/68223/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/68223/NewExpensify.dmg https://68223.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Asked QA team here

@m-natarajan
Copy link

Not reproducible on iPhone 16/18.3.1 build v9.2.3-0 PR:68223 Ad-Hoc

ScreenRecording_09-10-2025.13-15-45_1.MP4

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

In this case, LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny September 10, 2025 17:32
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@jmusial @ZhenjaHorbach can you please check the reasure failure? maybe we need to adjust mocks

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 11, 2025

@jmusial @ZhenjaHorbach can you please check the reasure failure? maybe we need to adjust mocks

I merged main and it's passing on my local ... Pipeline shows merge conflict with Mobile-Expensify but I don't thinks it's coming from this PR..

EDIT: ok, there is a percentage diff again - looking into it now, although so far passes on my local ;(

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 11, 2025

Ok, I checked and there is indeed an extra render that is a result of adding a

    const {isSmallScreenWidth} = useResponsiveLayout();
    if (isSmallScreenWidth) {

in src/components/PopoverWithMeasuredContent/index.tsx

Given that reported render duration is flat 0, I'd say that's ok, what do you think @mountiny ?

 - [ReportActionCompose] should press create button [render]: 0.0 ms → 0.0 ms  | 4 → 5 (+1, +25.0%) 🔴

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a small NAB, you can address that in another PR.

Yeah seems like the extra render is expected here but it should not cause pref regression so moving this ahead


/**
* Logic for PopoverWithMeasuredContent is in PopoverWithMeasuredContentBase.
* This component is a perf optimization, it return BOTTOM_DOCKED early, for small screens avoiding Popover measurement logic calculations.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this reads better

Suggested change
* This component is a perf optimization, it return BOTTOM_DOCKED early, for small screens avoiding Popover measurement logic calculations.
* This component is a perf optimization, it returns a BOTTOM_DOCKED modal early for small screens, avoiding Popover measurement logic calculations.

@mountiny mountiny merged commit c7b5990 into Expensify:main Sep 11, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.13-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.13-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants