Skip to content

[No QA] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings#79597

Merged
roryabraham merged 24 commits intomainfrom
Rory-ReactCompilerFirstPass
Jan 19, 2026
Merged

[No QA] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings#79597
roryabraham merged 24 commits intomainfrom
Rory-ReactCompilerFirstPass

Conversation

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Jan 14, 2026

Explanation of Change

In this PR, I migrated a batch of hooks and components to become compatible with React Compiler. All of these were previously not compiling, but now they are. I also removed all manual memoization. This has two purposes:

  • Hopefully will improve baseline performance across the board
  • Simplifies implementation significantly by removing manual memoization (net ~1000 lines of code removed)

For this batch, I focused on components with only manual memoization errors and not other Rules of React violations that cause React Compiler to fail, but are trickier/risker to fix. I excluded files that:

  • Can't be compiled due to React Compiler limitations (such as template object keys or finally clauses)
  • Have lint rules that aren't compatible with the new code style for compiled components (such as rulesdir/no-inline-useOnyx-selector or react/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.

Fixed Issues

(partial) #68765

Tests

Full regression tests will be completed on an AdHoc build before merge.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

n/a

QA Steps

None. Regression tests only.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Resolved conflicts in:
- TransactionListItem.tsx: Kept new mergeProhibitedViolations and fallback logic, removed useMemo
- AddUnreportedExpense.tsx: Used new AddUnreportedExpenseFooter component, removed useMemo
- NewReportWorkspaceSelectionPage.tsx: Kept new changeTransactionsReport API, removed useCallback/useMemo
- ProfilePage.tsx: Used currentUserAccountID from hook, removed useMemo
@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Jan 14, 2026
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings [WIP][No QA] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings Jan 14, 2026
Resolved conflict in LoginUtils.ts by keeping both normalizeLogin (from our branch) and sanitizePhoneOrEmail (from main).
@codecov

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Resolve conflict in TransactionListItem.tsx:
- Keep new policyID fallback logic for self DM tracking expenses
- Keep new policyCategories fetch and syncMissingAttendeesViolation
- Remove useMemo wrappers to trust React Compiler
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @roryabraham has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@nlemma
Copy link

nlemma commented Jan 15, 2026

Expense - Report field in IOU expense shows IOU, Report field in self DM is blank

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: v9.3.2-0 PR:79597
Reproducible in staging?: No
Reproducible in production?: No
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from BrowserStack: https://test-management.browserstack.com/projects/2219752/test-runs/TR-2977/folder/13177029/41237792/1126277307
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): sdjoisnjosjsodisjoijsi@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Bug source: Regression TC Execution
Device used: Mac 26.1 / Chrome

Action Performed:

  1. Go to 79597.pr-testing.expensify.com
  2. Open 1:1 DM.
  3. Create an expense.
  4. Open the expense report.
    BUG 1: Report field shows IOU instead of "User owes x".
  5. Go to self DM.
  6. Create an expense.
  7. Open the expense report.
    BUG 2: Report field is empty.

Expected Result:

BUG 1: Report field will show "User owes x".
BUG 2: Report field shows User (You).

Actual Result:

BUG 1: Report field shows IOU instead of "User owes x".
BUG 2: Report field is empty.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: App
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: App
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • iOS: mWeb Chrome
  • Windows: Chrome
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screenshots/Videos

Bug7049847_1768474118357.12.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@jponikarchuk
Copy link

This issue is still reproducible in the current build.

Resolve conflicts:
- SearchSidebar.tsx: Keep without useMemo import
- TransactionListItem.tsx: Use currentSearchResults from SearchContext instead of snapshot, add exportedReportActions, all without useMemo
- WorkspaceReportsPage.tsx: Keep without useMemo/useCallback, add type fallback for reportField.type
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

these issues are reproducible on main.

Kept lower max-warnings count (367) from React Compiler work.
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP][No QA] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings [No QA] Fix Batch 1 of React Compiler warnings Jan 16, 2026
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2026

npm has a package.json file and a package-lock.json file. It seems you updated one without the other, which is usually a sign of a mistake. If you are updating a package make sure that you update the version in package.json then run npm install

Resolved conflict in SplitExpensePage.tsx - kept non-memoized version
(trusting React Compiler).
Copy link
Contributor

@inimaga inimaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall the changes look good to me and no massive blockers. Just had a couple of clarifying questions regarding some bits.

@inimaga
Copy link
Contributor

inimaga commented Jan 19, 2026

You've also picked up some conflicts and lint errors.

Resolved conflicts:
- EmptySearchView.tsx: Added isFilteredWorkspaceAccessible logic (from main)
  without useMemo, integrated into existing assignment-based pattern
- SplitExpensePage.tsx: Added preferredLocale parameter to date formatting
  (from main) while keeping non-memoized version
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Conflicts resolved. I've fixed all lint errors except some in lint-changed that were pre-existing in some of the files touched here. I don't intend to fix all these to minimize the risk of this already-large PR.

@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from inimaga January 19, 2026 21:23
inimaga
inimaga previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2026
@inimaga
Copy link
Contributor

inimaga commented Jan 19, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit cac193a into main Jan 19, 2026
41 of 43 checks passed
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the Rory-ReactCompilerFirstPass branch January 19, 2026 21:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Jan 19, 2026
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 19, 2026

@roryabraham looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.5-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.3.5-7 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants