Skip to content

chore: deprecate timing.ts#81691

Open
adhorodyski wants to merge 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:timing-module-deprecate
Open

chore: deprecate timing.ts#81691
adhorodyski wants to merge 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:timing-module-deprecate

Conversation

@adhorodyski
Copy link
Contributor

@adhorodyski adhorodyski commented Feb 6, 2026

@rlinoz

Explanation of Change

This PR deprecates the Timing.ts module as well as any performance tracking done with Firebase. It includes a patch removal.

Let's make sure this PR is well tested on an adhoc.

Previous attempt (#80659) was still referencing the StartupTimer in logs, so was a premature merge.

Fixed Issues

$ #80357
PROPOSAL: N/A

MOBILE-EXPENSIFY: https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13841

Tests

  1. Open up the app.
  2. Navigate to any report.
  3. Send a message.
  4. Navigate to the Reports page.
  5. Navigate into any report from there.
  6. The App should not crash during this whole time.
  7. Open up Network tools, observe no calls to the /SendPerformanceTimings command have been made.

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as tests.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@adhorodyski adhorodyski requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2026 14:56
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and huult and removed request for a team February 6, 2026 14:56
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@huult Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 6, 2026 14:56
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9e29857395

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

);

Timing.end(CONST.TIMING.LOAD_SEARCH_OPTIONS);
Performance.markEnd(CONST.TIMING.LOAD_SEARCH_OPTIONS);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Add matching markStart for LOAD_SEARCH_OPTIONS

Now that the only Performance.markStart(CONST.TIMING.LOAD_SEARCH_OPTIONS) was removed, Performance.markEnd here will always run without a matching start mark. The custom marks observer calls measureFailSafe on every “_end” mark, which will throw and be caught/logged when the start mark is missing, so each search-options build will both lose its timing metric and emit a debug error. This happens whenever getSearchOptions runs (e.g., opening the search UI). Consider reinstating a corresponding markStart or removing the end mark to avoid noisy logs and missing metrics.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/Expensify.tsx 84.57% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN.tsx 95.71% <ø> (ø)
...ReportPreview/MoneyRequestReportPreviewContent.tsx 61.05% <ø> (+0.20%) ⬆️
...portActionItem/MoneyRequestReportPreview/index.tsx 89.28% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Search/SearchAutocompleteList.tsx 32.40% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
...rc/components/Search/SearchRouter/SearchButton.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Search/index.tsx 26.90% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
src/libs/API/types.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/BootSplash/index.native.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/BootSplash/index.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 14 more
... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

@rlinoz rlinoz self-requested a review February 6, 2026 16:30
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

🚧 @rlinoz has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 6, 2026

Reviewing soon.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 9, 2026

@codex review

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 9, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.21.45.52.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.21.48.14.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ScreenRecording_02-09-2026.22-04-12_1.MP4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.21.55.35.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.19.04.10.mp4

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 9, 2026

@adhorodyski Have you tried building and running this on a physical iOS device?

@adhorodyski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@huult building and running no, are you running into issues yourself? is everything ok with the adhoc?

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 9, 2026

@huult building and running no, are you running into issues yourself? is everything ok with the adhoc?

I can’t install the adhoc build because my device UUID isn’t included in the adhoc list.
I tried building on a physical device, but I needed to rebuild main.jsbundle following this guide:

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1754162292418269?thread_ts=1745474113.731259&cid=C01GTK53T8Q

However, I ran into the issues below.

Screenshot 2026-02-09 at 15 55 19

How did you verify this? Are you still using an emulator or simulator?

@huult
Copy link
Contributor

huult commented Feb 9, 2026

I can build on a physical device and start testing by following the steps above

);
runOnlyForDeploymentPostprocessing = 0;
shellPath = /bin/sh;
shellScript = "";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adhorodyski You added shellScript = ""; intentionally, right? Just confirming.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@adhorodyski adhorodyski Feb 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just the default after synchronizing in XCode (this is correct)

import Firebase
import Expo

Copy link
Contributor

@huult huult Feb 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove the added space in this file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2026-02-09 at 13 35 22

I believe the empty line formatting was off in the first place, I have only save the above diff (see hidden whitespaces).

Copy link
Contributor

@huult huult left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I built and tested the app on a physical iOS device and the emulator. The app did not crash.

@rlinoz If possible, could you ask someone on the AdHoc list to try testing it?

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants