Skip to content

Fix emoji skin tone type mismatch when stored as string#82021

Closed
WeberG619 wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
WeberG619:fix/emoji-skin-tone-type-mismatch
Closed

Fix emoji skin tone type mismatch when stored as string#82021
WeberG619 wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
WeberG619:fix/emoji-skin-tone-type-mismatch

Conversation

@WeberG619
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@WeberG619 WeberG619 commented Feb 10, 2026

Summary

$ #81909

When the server returns preferredEmojiSkinTone as a string (e.g., "2") instead of a number (2), two bugs occur:

  1. getSkinToneEmojiFromIndex.ts — Uses strict === comparison, so "2" !== 2 fails to match any skin tone, falling back to the default yellow hand display.

  2. usePreferredEmojiSkinTone.ts — Compares Number(stored) === Number(new), which returns true (both are 2), silently blocking any update attempt. The user sees the wrong skin tone and cannot change it.

Fix

  • Cast the stored Onyx value to Number early in both locations
  • getSkinToneEmojiFromIndex: emoji.skinTone === Number(skinToneIndex) ensures the lookup works regardless of stored type
  • usePreferredEmojiSkinTone: Normalize to numericPreferredSkinTone once, use it for comparison and return value — ensures downstream consumers always get a number

Fixed Issues

$ #81909

Tests

  1. In DevTools console, run: Onyx.merge('preferredEmojiSkinTone', "2")
  2. Open the emoji picker → verify skin tone button shows cream/light hand (not default yellow)
  3. Click the skin tone selector → verify cream/light is highlighted as selected
  4. Select a different skin tone (e.g., medium) → verify it updates immediately
  5. Close and re-open emoji picker → verify the new skin tone persists
  6. Set preferredEmojiSkinTone to number 3 via Onyx.merge('preferredEmojiSkinTone', 3) → verify it works as before (no regression)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Set skin tone while online, then go offline
  2. Re-open emoji picker → skin tone should still display correctly from cached Onyx value

QA Steps

  1. On staging, run Onyx.merge('preferredEmojiSkinTone', "4") in DevTools console
  2. Open emoji picker → verify skin tone shows medium-dark hand (not default yellow)
  3. Change skin tone → verify it updates and persists
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Before fix (string "2" stored): Default yellow hand shown, cannot change skin tone
After fix (string "2" stored): Correct cream/light hand shown, skin tone change works

This is a type-coercion fix with no visual UI changes — the emoji picker displays the correct skin tone that was already stored.

When the server returns preferredEmojiSkinTone as a string (e.g., "2")
instead of a number (2), two bugs occur:

1. getSkinToneEmojiFromIndex uses strict === comparison, so "2" !== 2
   fails to match, falling back to the default skin tone display.

2. usePreferredEmojiSkinTone compares Number(stored) === Number(new),
   which returns true (both are 2), silently blocking any update attempt.

Fix: Cast the stored value to Number early in both locations so the
comparison and display work correctly regardless of the stored type.

Fixes Expensify#81909

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@WeberG619 WeberG619 requested review from a team as code owners February 10, 2026 17:58
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from cead22 and trjExpensify and removed request for a team February 10, 2026 17:58
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Feb 10, 2026

@cead22 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Feb 10, 2026

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@WeberG619
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

CLABotify added a commit to Expensify/CLA that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: deda637db3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

export default function usePreferredEmojiSkinTone() {
const [preferredSkinTone = CONST.EMOJI_DEFAULT_SKIN_TONE] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PREFERRED_EMOJI_SKIN_TONE, {canBeMissing: true});

const numericPreferredSkinTone = Number(preferredSkinTone);
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate coerced skin tone before exposing it

Coercing preferredSkinTone with Number(...) unconditionally turns malformed cached values into seemingly valid numbers (for example '' or null become 0, and non-numeric strings become NaN). Downstream emoji picker code (e.g., EmojiPickerMenu/index.tsx and index.native.tsx) gates on typeof preferredSkinTone === 'number', so this change can now route invalid data through the skin-tone path and render the wrong variant instead of falling back to the default tone; previously those malformed values stayed non-numeric and safely fell back. Please guard the conversion (Number.isFinite/range check) and fall back to CONST.EMOJI_DEFAULT_SKIN_TONE when invalid.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify @cead22 please ignore this PR. The contributor didn't follow process. Not assigned in the linked issue.

@WeberG619
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Apologies — I submitted this PR prematurely before being assigned to the issue. Closing per the contributing guidelines. The proposal is still on the issue and the fix is ready to go once assigned.

@WeberG619 WeberG619 closed this Feb 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants