Skip to content

[A11y] Add button role to PressableWithDelayToggle for screen readers#84304

Merged
MarioExpensify merged 3 commits intomainfrom
claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

[A11y] Add button role to PressableWithDelayToggle for screen readers#84304
MarioExpensify merged 3 commits intomainfrom
claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Screen readers (e.g. JAWS + Chrome) announce the TFA Copy and Download buttons without a button role because PressableWithDelayToggle does not default its accessibilityRole to button. This violates WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).

This PR fixes the issue by:

  1. Defaulting accessibilityRole to CONST.ROLE.BUTTON in PressableWithDelayToggle, so all usages automatically get role="button" on web unless overridden.
  2. Removing dead accessible={false} props from the TFA page callers (CopyCodesPage.tsx, VerifyPage.tsx) — these were accepted by the type system but never forwarded to the inner pressable, so they had no effect.
  3. Replacing the blanket eslint-disable react-native-a11y/has-valid-accessibility-descriptors at the top of PressableWithDelayToggle.tsx with a targeted eslint-disable-next-line on just the inner PressableWithoutFeedback which legitimately uses accessible={false}.
  4. Improving the accessibilityLabel fallback to use visible text (text/textChecked props) when tooltip text is empty, so screen readers always announce a meaningful label.

Fixed Issues

$ #74861
PROPOSAL: #74861 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open the app in Chrome with a screen reader (JAWS or NVDA)
  2. Navigate to Settings > Security > Two-factor authentication
  3. Complete verification to reach the Copy Codes page
  4. Tab to the Copy button
  5. Verify the screen reader announces "Copy, button" (with the button role)
  6. Tab to the Download button
  7. Verify the screen reader announces "Download, button" (with the button role)
  8. Continue to Step 2 (Verify page)
  9. Tab to the Copy button next to the secret key
  10. Verify the screen reader announces "Copy, button" (with the button role)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — This is a UI accessibility fix (HTML role attributes). No network requests are involved.

QA Steps

  1. Open the web app in Chrome with a screen reader enabled (JAWS, NVDA, or VoiceOver)
  2. Navigate to Settings > Security > Two-factor authentication
  3. Complete the verification step to reach the Copy Codes page (step 1 of 3)
  4. Tab to the "Copy" and "Download" buttons
  5. Verify the screen reader announces each as a "button" (e.g. "Copy, button")
  6. Continue to step 2 (Verify page) and tab to the "Copy" button next to the secret key
  7. Verify it is also announced as a "button"
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A — Accessibility role changes only affect web screen readers.

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A — Accessibility role changes only affect web screen readers.

iOS: Native

N/A — Accessibility role changes only affect web screen readers.

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A — Accessibility role changes only affect web screen readers.

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A — Accessibility role changes primarily affect screen reader announcements. The visual appearance is unchanged.

…bility

Default accessibilityRole to CONST.ROLE.BUTTON in PressableWithDelayToggle so
screen readers announce the element as a button. Remove unused accessible={false}
props from TFA page callers. Replace blanket eslint-disable with targeted
eslint-disable-next-line on the inner PressableWithoutFeedback. Improve
accessibilityLabel fallback to use visible text when tooltip text is empty.

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team March 5, 2026 18:59
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I created this PR from an upstream branch since I don't have push access to your fork.

To take ownership of this branch and be able to push updates, run:

git remote add upstream https://github.com/Expensify/App.git
git fetch upstream claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle
git checkout -b claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle upstream/claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle
git push -u origin claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle

Then you can close this PR and open a new one from your fork.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
.../settings/Security/TwoFactorAuth/CopyCodesPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ges/settings/Security/TwoFactorAuth/VerifyPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../components/Pressable/PressableWithDelayToggle.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 191 files with indirect coverage changes

…sites

The PressableProps type requires either accessible={false} or an
accessibilityLabel string. These call sites were missing it, causing
TypeScript errors.

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed the failing typecheck check. The PressableProps type uses a discriminated union (RequiredAccessibilityLabel) that requires either accessible={false} or an explicit accessibilityLabel string. Three call sites in CopyCodesPage.tsx and VerifyPage.tsx were missing this prop, causing TS2322 errors.

Added accessibilityLabel to each call site, matching the pattern used by CopyTextToClipboard.tsx.

@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Mar 6, 2026

@MelvinBot Mark it as ready for review

@MelvinBot MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2026 03:14
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2026 03:14
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR has been marked as ready for review.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from trjExpensify and truph01 and removed request for a team March 6, 2026 03:14
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

@truph01 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team March 6, 2026 03:14
text={tooltipTexts}
shouldRender
>
{/* eslint-disable-next-line react-native-a11y/has-valid-accessibility-descriptors */}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-5 (docs)

The eslint-disable-next-line comment suppresses the react-native-a11y/has-valid-accessibility-descriptors rule but does not include an explanatory comment justifying why the disable is needed. Every ESLint disable should have an accompanying reason so future readers understand the exception.

Add a justification after the rule name using the -- separator:

{/* eslint-disable-next-line react-native-a11y/has-valid-accessibility-descriptors -- Inner pressable is intentionally non-accessible (accessible={false}) since the outer PressableView handles accessibility */}

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added the justification. See 26cd360.

styles={[styles.button, styles.buttonMedium, styles.twoFactorAuthCopyCodeButton]}
textStyles={[styles.buttonMediumText]}
accessible={false}
accessibilityLabel={translate('twoFactorAuth.copy')}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot It looks like accessibilityLabel is never used in PressableWithDelayToggle, right? If that’s the case, passing accessibilityLabel={translate('twoFactorAuth.copy')} would be redundant.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Could you investigate this one?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct — accessibilityLabel is not used by PressableWithDelayToggle at runtime.

Here's what happens:

  1. Not destructured: The component destructures 18 specific props by name at PressableWithDelayToggle.tsx:72-91, but accessibilityLabel is not among them, and there's no ...rest spread. The caller's value is silently dropped.

  2. Computed internally: At PressableWithDelayToggle.tsx:135, the component builds its own accessibilityLabel:

    accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts || (!isActive && textChecked ? textChecked : text) || ''}

    This derives from tooltipTexts, textChecked, and text — never from the caller-supplied prop.

  3. But required by TypeScript: PressableWithDelayToggleProps extends PressableProps, which uses a discriminated union (RequiredAccessibilityLabel in GenericPressable/types.ts:12-39) requiring either accessibilityLabel: string or accessible: false. Removing the prop would cause a compilation error.

So the prop is redundant at runtime but required by the type system. The proper fix would be to update PressableWithDelayToggleProps to override the RequiredAccessibilityLabel constraint (since the component always computes its own label), so callers don't need to pass a value that gets discarded. I'll address this in the next commit.

onPress={updatePressState}
accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts}
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/prefer-nullish-coalescing -- Fallback to visible text when tooltip is empty for screen readers
accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts || (!isActive && textChecked ? textChecked : text) || ''}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Is this out of scope for this issue?

Screen readers (e.g. JAWS + Chrome) announce the TFA Copy and Download buttons without a button role because PressableWithDelayToggle does not default its accessibilityRole to button. This violates WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The accessibilityLabel fallback is directly related to this issue. The issue is about screen readers not properly announcing the TFA buttons — without the fallback, if tooltipTexts is empty the screen reader would announce nothing at all. Adding the visible text (text/textChecked) as a fallback ensures screen readers always have a meaningful label, which is part of satisfying WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).

@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Mar 6, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained ""why"" the code was doing something instead of only explaining ""what"" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named ""index.js"". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-03-06.at.19.39.21.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-06.at.18.38.13.mov

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No, this is not out of scope — it's the core of the issue.

The primary reproduction steps in Expensify/App#74861 (steps 1–7) are specifically about the TFA Copy and Download buttons being announced without a button role. The "Actual Result" section also directly references these controls. The fix in PressableWithDelayToggle addresses this by defaulting accessibilityRole to CONST.ROLE.BUTTON.

The issue does list additional "Other Occurrences" (Contact methods, Company cards, Track Distance), but those likely involve different components and would be separate fixes. The TFA buttons are the primary reported problem.

onPress={updatePressState}
accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts}
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/prefer-nullish-coalescing -- Fallback to visible text when tooltip is empty for screen readers
accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts || (!isActive && textChecked ? textChecked : text) || ''}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Instead of keeping this inline:

accessibilityLabel={tooltipTexts || (!isActive && textChecked ? textChecked : text) || ''}

Consider creating a separate variable, such as processedAccessibilityLabel, and then using it like this:

accessibilityLabel={processedAccessibilityLabel}

This would improve readability and make the code easier to maintain.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done — extracted the expression into a processedAccessibilityLabel variable and moved the eslint-disable comment alongside it. See 26cd360.

…tyLabel variable and add eslint-disable justification

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2026 12:14
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #74861 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from MarioExpensify March 6, 2026 12:40
@MarioExpensify MarioExpensify merged commit 75fa989 into main Mar 6, 2026
37 checks passed
@MarioExpensify MarioExpensify deleted the claude-addButtonRoleToPressableWithDelayToggle branch March 6, 2026 13:32
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

🚧 @MarioExpensify has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 6, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 6, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MarioExpensify in version: 9.3.33-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 9, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.33-5 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants