Skip to content

Fixed implementation of useAutoUpdateTimezone to ignore delegate and do the check on focus event#84738

Open
shubham1206agra wants to merge 8 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
shubham1206agra:fix-auto-timezone
Open

Fixed implementation of useAutoUpdateTimezone to ignore delegate and do the check on focus event#84738
shubham1206agra wants to merge 8 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
shubham1206agra:fix-auto-timezone

Conversation

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra commented Mar 10, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #83765

Tests

  1. Log into the same account on two devices (or copilot into an account from a second device)
  2. Ensure both devices have "Set timezone automatically" enabled
  3. Set the two devices to different timezones
  4. Open the App on both devices
  5. Observe in the network tab that UpdateAutomaticTimezone calls does not fire continuously in an infinite loop
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/hooks/useAutoUpdateTimezone.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 13:27
@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra requested review from a team as code owners March 10, 2026 13:27
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and ahmedGaber93 and removed request for a team March 10, 2026 13:27
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2026

@ahmedGaber93 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team March 10, 2026 13:27
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1a98aa6147

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No Produce review on this one

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix — the root cause analysis is correct and moving away from the reactive useEffect on Onyx-synced timezone.selected does break the infinite loop.

A few concerns noted inline:

  1. No timezone check on initial mount — the most impactful one. The timezone won't be reconciled on first app load, only on subsequent focus events. This can be fixed without re-introducing the loop by adding a one-shot mount check.
  2. Equality check compares formatted vs. unformatted timezone valuesformatToSupportedTimezone can remap deprecated names, so the guard may miss semantic equality.
  3. Existing tests silently broken — 3 of 4 tests pass trivially because they never trigger the focus event and the hook no longer runs on mount.

See inline comments for details.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ahmedGaber93 commented Mar 12, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-04-14.at.10.55.23.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-14.at.10.27.27.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2026-04-14.at.10.55.23.PM.mov

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra I left two comments above: #84738 (comment) and #84738 (comment), please let me know what you think, or when this is ready again for review.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra any updates here?

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ahmedGaber93 commented Apr 7, 2026

@shubham1206agra any updates here? Bumped on slack.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ahmedGaber93 PR is now ready for review.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8f04842224

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra I still encountered this issue.

It’s not working with me after login. The API is only called after I refocus the tab.

Screen.Recording.2026-04-14.at.10.03.14.PM.mov

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ahmedGaber93 commented Apr 14, 2026

Another bug with the same root cause like the above issue.

New accounts show incorrect message time until the browser is refocused.

  1. Open App on DEV
  2. Login was new account
  3. Go to concierge chat.
  4. Verify That concierge message time is not correct
  5. Refocus the browser tab and verify the message time is updated correctly.
Screen.Recording.2026-04-15.at.12.13.55.AM.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MelvinBot Do you have any good fix that does not break React compiler?

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes — the issue is that useEffect(() => { updateTimezoneEvent(); }, []) only fires once on mount, before Onyx hydrates personal details. Here's a fix that stays React compiler compliant:

const useAutoUpdateTimezone = () => {
    const [isActingAsDelegate] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.ACCOUNT, {selector: isActingAsDelegateSelector});
    const currentUserPersonalDetails = useCurrentUserPersonalDetails();
    const timezone = currentUserPersonalDetails?.timezone ?? {};
    const isAutomatic = timezone?.automatic;

    const updateTimezone = useEffectEvent(() => {
        if (isActingAsDelegate) {
            return;
        }
        const currentTimezone = Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().timeZone as SelectedTimezone;
        const hasValidCurrentTimezone = typeof currentTimezone === 'string' && currentTimezone.trim().length > 0;
        const proposedTimezone = DateUtils.formatToSupportedTimezone({
            automatic: true,
            selected: currentTimezone,
        });

        if (hasValidCurrentTimezone && isAutomatic && timezone?.selected !== proposedTimezone.selected) {
            updateAutomaticTimezone(proposedTimezone, currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID);
        }
    });

    useAppFocusEvent(updateTimezone);
    useEffect(() => {
        updateTimezone();
    }, [isAutomatic]);
};

Why this works:

  • useEffectEvent → reads latest values at call time, compiler doesn't require it as a dep
  • useAppFocusEvent(updateTimezone) → stable function ref from useEffectEvent, so the focus listener isn't re-registered every render
  • useEffect(..., [isAutomatic]) → re-runs when Onyx hydrates timezone.automatic (undefinedtrue after login), but does not re-run when timezone.selected changes (which is what caused the original infinite loop)
  • No eslint-disable needed, fully React compiler compliant

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ahmedGaber93 It should be fixed now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants