Skip to content

Fix tax field showing wrong rate after cross-workspace merge#86178

Draft
MelvinBot wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixTaxFieldWrongRateAfterMerge
Draft

Fix tax field showing wrong rate after cross-workspace merge#86178
MelvinBot wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixTaxFieldWrongRateAfterMerge

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

When the same tax code (e.g., id_TAX_RATE_1) exists in multiple workspaces but refers to different tax rates, MoneyRequestView resolves the name from the current policy, which returns the wrong rate. This happens when merging expenses across workspaces or moving an expense to a different workspace's report.

This PR adds a percentage-based mismatch check: before displaying the policy-resolved tax name, we compare the policy rate's percentage with the transaction's stored taxValue. If both are defined and they differ, we know the tax code refers to a different rate in the current workspace, so we fall back to showing the raw tax percentage instead of a misleading rate name.

Fixed Issues

$ #85164
PROPOSAL: #85164 (comment)

Tests

  1. Create workspace A and workspace B, enable Taxes in both
  2. Edit Tax Rate 1 in workspace B to a different name and rate (e.g., "Custom Tax 3%")
  3. Create an expense in workspace A with Tax Rate 1 (5%)
  4. Create an expense in workspace B with the edited tax rate (3%)
  5. Open the expense from workspace B, click More > Merge
  6. Select the expense from workspace A > Continue
  7. On the details page, select the tax rate from workspace B and report from workspace A
  8. Continue and Merge expenses
  9. Open the merged expense
  10. Verify the Tax field displays the raw percentage (e.g., "3%") instead of workspace A's rate name ("Tax Rate 1 (5%)")
  11. Click the Tax field and verify the Tax RHP also shows the correct percentage

Alternative test (change report flow):

  1. Create 2 workspaces with Taxes enabled
  2. Change Tax Rate 1's value in workspace B from 5% to 3%
  3. Create expenses in both workspaces with Tax Rate 1
  4. Change expense B's report to a report in workspace A
  5. Verify expense B's tax row shows "3%" (not "Tax Rate 1 (5%)")
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

No change to offline behavior — this fix only affects how the tax rate name is resolved for display.

QA Steps

Same as tests above.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

…aces

When the same tax code exists in multiple workspaces but refers to
different rates, the policy lookup returns the wrong rate name. Add a
percentage-based mismatch check to detect cross-workspace tax code
collisions and fall back to showing the raw tax value instead.

Co-authored-by: Vinh Hoang <hoangzinh@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts 82.72% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

const categoryCopyValue = !canEdit ? decodedCategoryName : undefined;
const cardCopyValue = cardProgramName;
const taxRateValue = transaction?.taxName ?? taxRateTitle ?? fallbackTaxRateTitle;
const taxRateValue = hasConfirmedTaxMismatch ? fallbackTaxRateTitle : (transaction?.taxName ?? taxRateTitle ?? fallbackTaxRateTitle);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot do we need to change in this line? I think we can keep as it is

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question! The change on this line is needed — setting taxRateTitle to undefined alone isn't sufficient because of the fallback chain priority.

The original code is:

const taxRateValue = transaction?.taxName ?? taxRateTitle ?? fallbackTaxRateTitle;

transaction?.taxName is checked before taxRateTitle. Since taxName is a stored field on the transaction (set when the transaction was created in the original workspace), it doesn't update when the transaction moves to a different workspace. So even though we correctly set taxRateTitle = undefined when mismatch is detected, transaction?.taxName still holds the stale name from the source workspace and would be displayed first.

For example:

  • Transaction created in Workspace B with taxName = "Custom Tax (3%)", taxCode = "id_TAX_RATE_1"
  • After merge/move to Workspace A, transaction.taxName is still "Custom Tax (3%)"
  • In the fallback chain, transaction?.taxName is truthy → it wins, even though taxRateTitle was set to undefined

The fix bypasses transaction?.taxName entirely when mismatch is confirmed, falling back to fallbackTaxRateTitle (transaction?.taxValue, the raw percentage like "3%") which is always accurate.

Evidence: taxName is stored on the transaction type (Transaction.ts:462-463), and in merge flows it's set from the source policy (MergeTransactionUtils.ts:631), not the destination.

Comment on lines +312 to +314
const defaultTaxCode = getDefaultTaxCode(policy, transaction);
const taxRatePercentage = getTaxValue(policy, transaction, transaction?.taxCode ?? defaultTaxCode ?? '');
const hasConfirmedTaxMismatch = taxRatePercentage !== undefined && transaction?.taxValue !== undefined && taxRatePercentage !== transaction?.taxValue;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot I think we can put this one into a shareable util and add unit test for this one. Wdyt>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea! Done — I've extracted the mismatch detection logic into a hasConfirmedTaxMismatch(policy, transaction) utility in TransactionUtils/index.ts and added 7 unit tests covering:

  • Mismatch detected (different percentages for same tax code)
  • No mismatch (matching percentages)
  • undefined transaction taxValue (graceful false)
  • Non-existent tax code in policy (graceful false)
  • undefined transaction or policy (graceful false)
  • Default tax code fallback when transaction has no taxCode

MoneyRequestView.tsx now imports and calls the util directly instead of inlining the logic.

Move the cross-workspace tax mismatch detection logic from MoneyRequestView
into TransactionUtils as a reusable hasConfirmedTaxMismatch function, and
add comprehensive unit tests covering match, mismatch, undefined, and
default tax code scenarios.

Co-authored-by: Vinh Hoang <hoangzinh@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts Outdated
* This happens in cross-workspace merge/move flows where the same tax code (e.g., `id_TAX_RATE_1`) maps to
* different rates in different workspaces. Returns true only when both values are defined and they differ.
*/
function hasConfirmedTaxMismatch(policy: OnyxEntry<Policy>, transaction: OnyxEntry<Transaction>): boolean {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot The method name is confusing to me. Do you have any alternative names? What do you think of hasTaxValueMismatch?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call — hasTaxValueMismatch is cleaner and more descriptive. Renamed it across all three files (TransactionUtils, MoneyRequestView, and the tests) in 8f63254.

Co-authored-by: Vinh Hoang <hoangzinh@users.noreply.github.com>
@hoangzinh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot can you resolve conflict on this PR?

…heck

Co-authored-by: Vinh Hoang <hoangzinh@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Resolved the merge conflict in MoneyRequestView.tsx. Main already had an equivalent fix for the tax mismatch issue (from a different PR by huult), so I adopted main's inline approach (hasTaxValueChanged / selectedPolicyTaxValue) for the conflicting sections and removed the now-unused hasTaxValueMismatch import.

The utility function and tests added in earlier commits still exist in TransactionUtils — they can be kept for potential reuse elsewhere or removed if you prefer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8f63254404

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

*/
function hasTaxValueMismatch(policy: OnyxEntry<Policy>, transaction: OnyxEntry<Transaction>): boolean {
const defaultTaxCode = getDefaultTaxCode(policy, transaction);
const taxRatePercentage = getTaxValue(policy, transaction, transaction?.taxCode ?? defaultTaxCode ?? '');
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Fall back to default tax code when taxCode is empty

The mismatch check uses transaction?.taxCode ?? defaultTaxCode, so an empty-string taxCode is treated as a real code instead of falling back to the policy default. This diverges from getTaxName() (which explicitly treats empty string as missing), and causes hasTaxValueMismatch() to return false when the transaction has taxCode: '' but a taxValue from another workspace. In that case, MoneyRequestView can still show the current workspace tax name instead of the raw percentage, so the cross-workspace fix is bypassed for this input shape.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants