Skip to content

Remove onClick from non-interactive Pressables to fix TalkBack a11y#86731

Merged
Valforte merged 9 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixNonInteractivePressableA11y
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

Remove onClick from non-interactive Pressables to fix TalkBack a11y#86731
Valforte merged 9 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixNonInteractivePressableA11y

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

When interactive={false} on a MenuItem, TalkBack on Android mWeb still announces "double tap to activate" because React Native Web's Pressable always registers an onClick event listener — even when no press behavior is configured.

This PR fixes the issue at its root with two coordinated changes:

  1. BaseGenericPressable: When interactive=false, stops passing onPress and onLongPress to the underlying RNW Pressable (previously these were passed but returned early internally).

  2. New RNW patch (013): In the Pressable component, when both onPress and onLongPress are null, the onClick handler is stripped from pressEventHandlers before they are spread onto the DOM element. This prevents TalkBack from detecting a click listener and announcing the element as actionable.

This approach (Approach A from the issue discussion) is safer than replacing PressableWithSecondaryInteraction with a View wrapper because it only removes the click event listener — no layout, styling, or ARIA attribute changes.

Fixed Issues

$ #79243

Tests

  1. Open the app on Android Chrome with TalkBack enabled
  2. Navigate to a page with non-interactive MenuItem components (e.g., Settings > Wallet > Virtual Card details showing "Limit type", "Remaining limit")
  3. Swipe to focus on a non-interactive menu item
  4. Verify TalkBack does not announce "double tap to activate"
  5. Verify interactive menu items still work normally (tapping navigates, TalkBack announces them as actionable)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — This is a client-side accessibility fix that doesn't involve network requests.

QA Steps

  1. On Android Chrome with TalkBack enabled, navigate to Settings > Wallet > Virtual Card details
  2. Swipe through the non-interactive menu items (Limit type, Remaining limit, etc.)
  3. Verify TalkBack does not say "double tap to activate" for these items
  4. Verify interactive items still announce correctly and respond to taps
  5. On iOS (native + mWeb Safari) and desktop web, verify no regressions — menu items should behave identically to before
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
The patch file was missing source line 69 (onPressEnd: onPressOut)
from the hunk body, causing a line count mismatch that made
patch-package unable to parse the file.

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed the failing build checks: the react-native-web+0.21.2+013+fix-non-interactive-pressable-a11y.patch file was missing a context line (source line 69: onPressEnd: onPressOut), which caused a line count mismatch in the hunk header (@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ expected 6 old lines but only 5 were present). This made patch-package unable to parse the patch. Added the missing context line to fix the parse error.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The original check failures (ESLint, Prettier, Changed files ESLint, Check for unused styles, Translation Dry Run) were all caused by the same root cause: the patch file react-native-web+0.21.2+013+fix-non-interactive-pressable-a11y.patch could not be parsed by patch-package during npm ci. This was already fixed in commit 17a26ba2 ("Fix: add missing context line to RNW Pressable patch").

Current status after the fix:

  • All PR-related checks pass: ESLint, Prettier, typecheck, all 4 app builds, Storybook tests, spellcheck, validate-patches, Changed files ESLint, Check for unused styles
  • Verify Android HybridApp builds on main / Build Android app — This failure is unrelated to this PR. It errors with Failed to read autolinking config in @rock-js/tools, which is an infrastructure/tooling issue. The patch applied successfully in this run (patch-package succeeded without errors or warnings). This PR only modifies a react-native-web patch and BaseGenericPressable.tsx, neither of which affect autolinking.
  • Tests (jobs 1-8) — Still running at time of this comment, but all lint/type/build checks pass.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The failing checks are unrelated to this PR's changes.

1. test (job 6)tests/unit/MiddlewareTest.ts:442

  • Test: "OpenReport to a new chat without preexistingReportID and clean up optimistic participant data"
  • Failure: expect(global.fetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) — expected 1 call, received 3
  • This is a middleware/fetch test. This PR only modifies BaseGenericPressable.tsx and adds a react-native-web patch for Pressable click handlers — no middleware or fetch logic is touched.

2. Verify Android HybridApp builds on main / Build Android app

  • This check verifies the main branch builds correctly, not the PR branch. Any failure here is a main-branch issue, not caused by this PR.

Evidence: The PR changes 3 files — BaseGenericPressable.tsx, a new RNW patch file, and patches/react-native-web/details.md. None of these are related to middleware, fetch behavior, or Android build configuration.

No action needed on this PR — these are pre-existing/flaky failures.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The failing checks are unrelated to this PR's changes (Pressable/react-native-web patch).

1. Verify Android HybridApp builds on main / Build Android app
The "Rock Remote Build - Android" step ran for only ~35 seconds before failing — this points to an infrastructure/remote build service issue, not a code problem. This PR doesn't modify any Android build configuration or native code.

2. test (job 6)tests/unit/MiddlewareTest.ts:442

expect(global.fetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
Expected: 1 | Received: 3

This test (OpenReport to a new chat without preexistingReportID and clean up optimistic participant data) is about API middleware behavior and has no connection to Pressable components or react-native-web patches. This appears to be a flaky test — extra fetch calls are being triggered during the test that aren't related to the code under test.

Evidence: The PR only touches:

  • patches/react-native-web/details.md
  • patches/react-native-web/react-native-web+0.21.2+013+fix-non-interactive-pressable-a11y.patch
  • src/components/Pressable/GenericPressable/implementation/BaseGenericPressable.tsx

None of these files affect API middleware or Android native builds.

Recommendation: Re-run the failing checks — both failures should resolve on retry.

@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Mar 31, 2026

@MelvinBot Your solution doesn't work when the interactive={false} is passed in:

<MenuItemWithTopDescription

…eraction

MenuItem was not forwarding the interactive prop to the pressable chain,
so GenericPressable always saw interactive=true (the default). This meant
the onPress/onLongPress suppression in BaseGenericPressable had no effect
for interactive={false} MenuItems like those in CardDetails.

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Good catch — MenuItem wasn't forwarding the interactive prop to PressableWithSecondaryInteraction, so GenericPressable always saw interactive=true (the default). The onPress/onLongPress suppression in BaseGenericPressable had no effect for interactive={false} MenuItems.

Fixed in 499b86c by adding interactive={interactive} to the PressableWithSecondaryInteraction in MenuItem.tsx. Now the prop flows through the full chain: MenuItemPressableWithSecondaryInteractionPressableWithFeedbackGenericPressable → RNW Pressable.

Copy-on-long-press for copyable items should still work because PressableWithSecondaryInteraction also registers a DOM contextmenu listener (independent of the React onLongPress path), which handles long-press copy on touch devices.

MelvinBot and others added 2 commits March 31, 2026 15:30
…ivePressableA11y

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed the failing Prettier check. The issue was a duplicate reportActions variable declaration in src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHNData.tsx that was introduced on main by the merge of PR #86644. After merging main into this branch to bring it up to date, I removed the redundant second declaration (both fetched report actions for the same report ID).

…ivePressableA11y

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Merged with the latest main to ensure CI's merge commit stays clean. The two failures on the previous run were:

  1. perf-tests — Same duplicate reportActions declaration issue (already fixed in my earlier commit). This should now pass since the branch is fully up to date with main.

  2. iOS HybridApp build — Unrelated infrastructure failure: CDN: trunk Repo update failed (CocoaPods CDN was unreachable, failed all 5 retry attempts). This is a transient CI issue, not related to this PR's changes.

@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Mar 31, 2026

@MelvinBot, mark this PR as ready for review

@MelvinBot MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 15:57
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 15:57
@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Mar 31, 2026

Android-chrome result:

Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.22.54.37.mov

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done — PR is now marked as ready for review.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from trjExpensify and truph01 and removed request for a team and truph01 March 31, 2026 15:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@truph01 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from a team and truph01 and removed request for a team March 31, 2026 15:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@chiragsalian Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Valforte
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@truph01 can you check codex review comment if it's relevant?

@dominictb dominictb requested review from dominictb and removed request for chiragsalian April 1, 2026 10:07
trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Accessibility project PR 👍

Remove the `interactive` gate from onLongPress so that long-press-to-copy
still works on touch devices for copyable non-interactive MenuItems.
The TalkBack a11y fix only needs onPress suppressed, not onLongPress.

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Apr 1, 2026

@truph01 can you check codex review comment if it's relevant?

@Valforte That comment makes sense, and I updated the PR to align with it.

cc @dominictb

@dominictb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dominictb commented Apr 2, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-04-02.at.10.42.42.mov
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-02.at.10.38.45.mov

activate" on non-interactive Pressables. Removing onClick when there are no press
handlers prevents this incorrect announcement.
```
- Upstream PR/issue: 🛑
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@truph01 This patch is a quick fix but we'll still need an upstream fix. Please create upstream PR. Don't need to do this now.

```
- Upstream PR/issue: 🛑
- E/App issue: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/79243
- PR introducing patch: TBD
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- PR introducing patch: TBD
- PR introducing patch: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/86731

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated! Replaced TBD with the actual PR link.

Comment on lines +9 to +11
+ // When no press or longPress callbacks are configured, remove the onClick
+ // handler so that assistive technology (e.g. TalkBack on Android mWeb) does
+ // not detect a click listener and announce the element as actionable.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

details.md already includes this

Suggested change
+ // When no press or longPress callbacks are configured, remove the onClick
+ // handler so that assistive technology (e.g. TalkBack on Android mWeb) does
+ // not detect a click listener and announce the element as actionable.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch — removed the inline comment from the patch. The explanation is already in details.md.

@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Apr 2, 2026

@MelvinBot Please resolve these two comments #86731 (comment)
#86731 (comment)

- Replace TBD with actual PR link in details.md
- Remove inline comment from patch file (already documented in details.md)

Co-authored-by: truph01 <truph01@users.noreply.github.com>
@truph01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

truph01 commented Apr 2, 2026

@dominictb Melvin resolved your two comments

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dominictb dominictb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎀

@dominictb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Valforte All yours

@Valforte Valforte merged commit 8db863b into main Apr 2, 2026
46 checks passed
@Valforte Valforte deleted the claude-fixNonInteractivePressableA11y branch April 2, 2026 15:09
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 2, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2026

🚧 @Valforte has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 2, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.3.52-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No help site changes are required for this PR.

This is a purely technical accessibility bug fix — it removes the onClick handler from non-interactive Pressable components so TalkBack on Android mWeb stops announcing "double tap to activate" on non-actionable elements. It doesn't change any user-facing features, workflows, settings, or UI text that would be documented in the help site articles under docs/articles.

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Blocker ##87002 was identified to be related to this PR

@nlemma
Copy link
Copy Markdown

nlemma commented Apr 2, 2026

Deploy Blocker #87025 was identified to be related to this PR.

@mvtglobally
Copy link
Copy Markdown

QA team is going to verify the following QA Steps

  • Navigate to Settings > Wallet > Virtual Card details
  • Swipe through the non-interactive menu items (Limit type, Remaining limit, etc.)
  • Verify interactive items respond to taps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants