Skip to content

Missing messages edge case#86735

Merged
luacmartins merged 5 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:fix/85647-missing-messages-edge-case
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

Missing messages edge case#86735
luacmartins merged 5 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:fix/85647-missing-messages-edge-case

Conversation

@koko57
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@koko57 koko57 commented Mar 31, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixing the edge case for the reports with more than 50 messages or messages sent between IOUs. More infoo here: #86114 (comment)

Fixed Issues

$ #85647
PROPOSAL: -

Tests

Prerequisites: at least one workspace

  1. Create two new reports
  2. In one of the report create i.e 42 expenses (max 48), then send ~ 80 messages (use numbers for easier testing) and then create one more expense
  3. In the other report make a sequence: create 3 expenses then send 3 messages -> repeat 10 times -> you'll have 30 expenses and 30 messages (and possibly some Concierge messages sent along the way). Then create 25 expenses.
  4. Log out / log in or clear the data and restart (in Troubleshoot). You can also remove the Report Actions objects from Application tab going to Storage -> IndexedDB -> OnyxDB -> keyvaluepairs with the same id as the report (id in url) and then refresh the site
  5. Go to the first report
  6. Scroll down
  7. Verify that you see all the messages and IOUs
  8. Repeat for another report
  9. You can test other cases with IOUs and messages sent in a different order, but there must be more than 50 actions in total
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.14.12.40.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.14.17.37.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.14.00.05.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.14.01.27.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.15.11.08.mp4

@koko57 koko57 requested review from a team as code owners March 31, 2026 13:13
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@jayeshmangwani Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@koko57
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Mar 31, 2026

@luacmartins I think @suneox should review this PR as he has more context

if (!isBackfillingRef.current) {
const hasIOUActions = reportActions.some((action) => isMoneyRequestAction(action));
if (!hasIOUActions || reportActions.length < 50 || !reportMetadata?.newestFetchedReportActionID) {
return;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The magic number 50 is used as a threshold to determine whether to trigger the backfill loop, but its meaning is not self-evident. If this value represents the backend page size or a similar server-side constant, it should be extracted into a named constant so future readers understand its origin and can update it in one place if the backend changes.

Extract the threshold into a named constant:

const BACKFILL_MIN_ACTIONS_THRESHOLD = 50;
// ...
if (!hasIOUActions || reportActions.length < BACKFILL_MIN_ACTIONS_THRESHOLD || !reportMetadata?.newestFetchedReportActionID) {

Alternatively, if this corresponds to an existing constant (e.g., a page size in CONST), reference that instead.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

prevBackfillCursorRef.current = cursor;
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-deprecated
InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => requestAnimationFrame(() => getOlderActions(reportID, cursor)));
}, [
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-15 (docs)

The useEffect schedules async work via InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions and requestAnimationFrame, but provides no cleanup function. If the effect re-fires (e.g., because reportActions changed or the user navigated away), the previously scheduled callback will still execute, calling getOlderActions with a potentially stale reportID and cursor. This creates a race condition where multiple in-flight backfill requests could overlap.

Return a cleanup function that cancels the pending interaction and animation frame:

useEffect(() => {
    // ... guards ...

    isBackfillingRef.current = true;
    prevBackfillCursorRef.current = cursor;
    let rafId: number;
    // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-deprecated
    const handle = InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => {
        rafId = requestAnimationFrame(() => getOlderActions(reportID, cursor));
    });

    return () => {
        handle.cancel();
        if (rafId) {
            cancelAnimationFrame(rafId);
        }
    };
}, [/* deps */]);

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

prevBackfillCursorRef.current = cursor;
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-deprecated
InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => requestAnimationFrame(() => getOlderActions(reportID, cursor)));
}, [
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-5 (docs)

The eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-deprecated comment lacks a justification explaining why the deprecated InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions API is being used. Even though the same pattern exists elsewhere in the file, each suppression should include a brief explanation so reviewers and future maintainers understand the exception.

Add a justification comment:

// InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions is deprecated but still the best way to defer
// work until after animations complete on React Native; no replacement API exists yet.
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-deprecated
InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => requestAnimationFrame(() => getOlderActions(reportID, cursor)));

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/Middleware/Pagination.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...equestReportView/MoneyRequestReportActionsList.tsx 56.01% <33.33%> (-1.72%) ⬇️
... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5f8427fd23

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +444 to +445
const cursor = isBackfillingRef.current ? reportMetadata?.oldestFetchedReportActionID : reportMetadata?.newestFetchedReportActionID;
if (!cursor) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reset backfill refs on report switch

When reportID changes but this component instance is reused, isBackfillingRef.current and prevBackfillCursorRef.current keep values from the previous report. In that state, this effect immediately switches to oldestFetchedReportActionID for the new report; if that cursor is not set yet (common on first load), it returns early and never starts backfilling from newestFetchedReportActionID. This reintroduces the missing-messages gap for the next money request report opened in the same session.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@luacmartins luacmartins requested review from luacmartins and suneox and removed request for jayeshmangwani March 31, 2026 14:52
@luacmartins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

luacmartins commented Mar 31, 2026

@suneox reviewed the original PR, so I'm assigning them as reviewer here too

@suneox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

suneox commented Mar 31, 2026

I will take a look on this one soon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@suneox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

suneox commented Apr 1, 2026

I’ll take a look at this one after an hour.

@suneox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

suneox commented Apr 1, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.01.01.55.4.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.01.01.55.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.01.13.58.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.01.04.59.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.00.57.11.3.mp4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@suneox suneox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently, the solution of continuously backfilling messages using a cursor within a short period can fully resolve loading messages in the report. However, rendering becomes slow with around 170 messages but I think we can handle large list performance issue as a separate issue for further optimization.

continuously backfilling messages performance Image
CleanShot.2026-04-02.at.00.25.40.2.mp4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit a6e3310 into Expensify:main Apr 1, 2026
32 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2026

🚧 @luacmartins has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 1, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 2, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.52-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site changes are required for this PR.

This PR fixes an internal edge case in report action pagination (loading messages in reports with 50+ actions or messages interleaved with IOUs). The changes are confined to:

  • MoneyRequestReportActionsList.tsx — pagination trigger logic
  • Pagination.ts — middleware gap detection
  • ReportMetadata.ts — type additions

No user-facing features, settings, UI labels, or workflows were added or modified — this is a bug fix for data loading behavior that was already documented/expected to work. The help site articles under docs/articles do not need updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants