Skip to content

fixed custom report deploy blockers#86824

Open
mukhrr wants to merge 26 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
mukhrr:fix/custom-report-columns-bugs
Open

fixed custom report deploy blockers#86824
mukhrr wants to merge 26 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
mukhrr:fix/custom-report-columns-bugs

Conversation

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mukhrr mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #86786
#86820
#86784
#86807
PROPOSAL:

Tests

#86786

  1. Login with new account
  2. Create 2 expenses (make sure to change curreny when creating)
  3. Go to Report/Reports
  4. Open report
  • Verify you see Exchange Rate and Original amount columns
  1. CLick Columns
  • Verify Exchange Rate and Original amount are selected

#86820

  1. Login with new account
  2. Create 2 expenses
  3. Go to Report/Reports
  4. CLick Columns and Save
  • Verify there is no space between Amount and chevron right icon in the end of row

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
REC-20260303100105.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
REC-20260303100105.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_mWeb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mp4

@mukhrr mukhrr requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2026 01:54
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from Pujan92 and trjExpensify and removed request for a team April 1, 2026 01:54
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 1, 2026

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team April 1, 2026 01:54
Comment thread src/pages/settings/Report/ReportDetailsColumnsPage.tsx Outdated
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 92.30% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Search/SearchTableHeader.tsx 5.33% <ø> (ø)
src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx 89.56% <100.00%> (+0.27%) ⬆️
src/libs/ReportUtils.ts 82.47% <ø> (+1.19%) ⬆️
src/libs/CardUtils.ts 81.68% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts 84.35% <80.00%> (+0.97%) ⬆️
src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts 63.91% <72.72%> (+0.49%) ⬆️
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx 0.35% <0.00%> (+0.35%) ⬆️
...pages/settings/Report/ReportDetailsColumnsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 250 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 24e66578cc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/pages/settings/Report/ReportDetailsColumnsPage.tsx Outdated
@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

@QichenZhu pls, let's try to review and merge this as soon as possible before reverting this big PR #83981

@Pujan92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Apr 1, 2026

@trjExpensify Plz assign @QichenZhu if they are going to review this PR

@JS00001 JS00001 requested review from QichenZhu and removed request for Pujan92 April 1, 2026 11:59
@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

@mukhrr can you work on the other two blockers here as well?

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

Hmm, @mukhrr this PR fixes two issues, and is pretty large, so I don't think that we should CP this one. Do you have a way to easily disable the feature that we can CP?

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

@mukhrr can you work on the other two blockers here as well?

I think the rest two are expected. pls see #86784 (comment) and #86807 (comment)

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

Hmm, @mukhrr this PR fixes two issues, and is pretty large, so I don't think that we should CP this one. Do you have a way to easily disable the feature that we can CP?

I think we can remove Columns button for now as we did last time.

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

@mukhrr great, could you create a PR for that please?

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

Then we can merge this fix to main right after

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

@mukhrr great, could you create a PR for that please?

@JS00001 here it is #86872

@JS00001 JS00001 self-requested a review April 1, 2026 13:03
@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

@mukhrr lets also fix this here (cc @trjExpensify )

We should be using: convertedAmount should be used as amount and amount should be used as originalAmount. For the report view specifically, we should show the amount as the amount converted to the reports currency

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 1, 2026

should be using: convertedAmount should be used as amount and amount should be used as originalAmount. For the report view specifically, we should show the amount as the amount converted to the reports currency

@JS00001 this is not the issue as deploy blocker, isn't it?

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 1, 2026

I dont think so, no, its an issue tom just realized

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 17, 2026

@QichenZhu I was not able to find Spend page. But yeah, I found I missed Original amount and Exchange Rate in Expenses Search page. So I fixed it and assume it's fixed on Spend page also.

Could you pls check it once more?!

Thank your for your patience too!

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Found a weird bug, not sure if it's frontend or backend. If you open a report and log into the same account on another device or incognito window, the report data are corrupted (see video 00:30-00:35). Staging has the same underlying issue but it's not visible to users.

Screen.Recording.2026-04-20.at.2.54.14.PM.mov

@mukhrr @JS00001 @trjExpensify

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Staging has the same underlying issue but it's not visible to users.

How, if that's true?

If you open a report and log into the same account on another device or incognito window, the report data are corrupted (see video 00:30-00:35)

Do you need to sign-in afresh in a different device/browser or does just operating another tab reveal the bug too?

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 20, 2026

Found a weird bug, not sure if it's frontend or backend. If you open a report and log into the same account on another device or incognito window, the report data are corrupted (see video 00:30-00:35). Staging has the same underlying issue but it's not visible to users.

Is openapp returning incorrect data?

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QichenZhu commented Apr 20, 2026

Staging has the same underlying issue but it's not visible to users.

How, if that's true?

The affected columns are hidden on staging unless enabled this way.

If you open a report and log into the same account on another device or incognito window, the report data are corrupted (see video 00:30-00:35)

Do you need to sign-in afresh in a different device/browser or does just operating another tab reveal the bug too?

It needs a fresh sign-in.

Is openapp returning incorrect data?

I think it's ReconnectApp if it's a backend issue.

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 20, 2026

@QichenZhu is this because we don't send the convertedAmount?

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 21, 2026

@QichenZhu is this because we don't send the convertedAmount?

@JS00001 yes, it misses convertedAmount

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 21, 2026

@mukhrr is that true?
image

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 21, 2026

@mukhrr is that true?

@JS00001 seems you are checking /OpenApp, and we're talking about /ReconnectApp :]

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 21, 2026

They both use the same command under the hood:
image

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QichenZhu commented Apr 21, 2026

Do these network logs help?

OpenApp

requestID: "9efd05b85dc4d99f-SJC"

ReconnectApp

ReconnectApp

requestID: "9efd08c1ea36d9b7-LAX"

OpenReport

Diff

Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 2 35 37 AM

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 21, 2026

Ooh I see where its getting overridden

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 21, 2026

One sec, will work on a BE change

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 21, 2026

@QichenZhu meanwhile can we proceed with FE changes?

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 21, 2026

BE PR: https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/21194

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 22, 2026

@QichenZhu @mukhrr the BE PR is deployed, can you recheck the issue please?

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bug: exchange rate and total columns disappear for certain amounts

Steps
  1. Create a $10 expense in a USD workspace.
  2. Edit the amount to NZ$16.97.
  3. Enable the exchange rate and total columns and verify they appear.
  4. Edit the amount to NZ$16.96, NZ$16.95, and NZ$16.94.
Expected result

Exchange rate and total columns show for all NZD amounts regardless of value.

Actual result

Exchange rate and total columns disappear for NZ$16.95 and NZ$16.96, but display correctly for other values.

86824-bug.mov

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 22, 2026

@mukhrr I think thats a FE bug ^

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yeah that's a FE bug. I'm sure it will be fixed quickly, but we seem to be in a cycle of fixing known bugs while new ones surface. Can we put the feature behind a beta and find more resources to help stabilize it?

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 22, 2026

Yeah that's a FE bug. I'm sure it will be fixed quickly, but we seem to be in a cycle of fixing known bugs while new ones surface. Can we put the feature behind a beta and find more resources to help stabilize it?

@QichenZhu this is now fixed and I agree with your idea.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @trjExpensify has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@JS00001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JS00001 commented Apr 22, 2026

but we seem to be in a cycle of fixing known bugs while new ones surface.

I dont think we should put this behind a beta. However, if you'd like, we could ask QA to run through the test steps and see any issues they may find before we merge?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #86824.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Web 🕸️
https://86824.pr-testing.expensify.com
Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

However, if you'd like, we could ask QA to run through the test steps and see any issues they may find before we merge?

That would be great! Before that, let's figure out why we are in this cycle. For example, the most recent bug came from changes made last week to fix another bug, which feels like a result of AI misuse. If so, it might be time to switch models.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Took it for a little spin. The default filed in the report should be Total now, right?

image

Amount is the column added with Exchange rate when there's currency conversion:

image

Classic for example:

2026-04-22_23-41-09.mp4

@mukhrr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mukhrr commented Apr 23, 2026

@trjExpensify yeah it makes sense. Now it should be okay cc @QichenZhu

Comment thread src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts
Comment on lines +595 to +596
<AmountCell
total={Math.abs(convertedAmount)}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Amount is negative but Total is positive.

New Expensify
Image
Expensify Classic
Image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But do we really need to show positive since it was created as negative originally? cc @trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@QichenZhu QichenZhu Apr 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Classic shows both fields as negative, so we should make Total negative, not the other way around.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean positive? Since I see in both your screenshot and mine, Classic shows positive

image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@QichenZhu QichenZhu Apr 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I mean negative. The parentheses represent a negative value.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay 👍. Let's also have Tom confirm it

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

parenthesis does represent a negative value in Classic. 👍 In NewDot we display a negative expense with a minus sign.

Comment on lines +587 to +588
case CONST.SEARCH.TABLE_COLUMNS.TOTAL: {
const convertedAmount = transactionItem.convertedAmount ?? 0;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: expenses created offline show zero as Total.

Image

@trjExpensify should we show Total as blank or the unconverted amount for an offline expense?

Comment thread src/pages/settings/Report/ReportDetailsColumnsPage.tsx
Comment thread src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants