Skip to content

fix: prevent Concierge redirect and LHN disappearance when vacation delegate splits expense#86869

Open
neerajbachani wants to merge 3 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
neerajbachani:fix/84248-vacation-delegate-lhn-clean
Open

fix: prevent Concierge redirect and LHN disappearance when vacation delegate splits expense#86869
neerajbachani wants to merge 3 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
neerajbachani:fix/84248-vacation-delegate-lhn-clean

Conversation

@neerajbachani
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@neerajbachani neerajbachani commented Apr 1, 2026

Explanation of Change

When a vacation delegate (Account C) splits a submitted expense, the server sends an Onyx SET update that temporarily wipes the workspace chat report on the submitter's (Account D) client. This triggered two navigation effects in ReportScreen.tsx before the data recovered:

  • Effect 1 (isRemovalExpectedForReportType) incorrectly flagged the workspace chat as removed and initiated navigation away
  • Effect 2 (reportWasDeleted effect) navigated to Concierge, and caused an infinite loop if the screen remained in the navigation stack (pressing Back re-triggered the effect)

On mobile (narrow layout), the LHN didn't recover because useSidebarOrderedReports skips force-inclusion of the focused report on narrow layouts. On web (wide layout), the sidebar force-includes it so it reappeared after ~2 seconds.

Three targeted fixes across three files:

ReportScreen.tsx

  • Added isCurrentRouteOwnWorkspaceChatRef — a useRef set synchronously during render that survives the Onyx wipe window (by the time navigation effects fire, prevReport is already undefined so usePrevious cannot be used)
  • Effect 1 guard: changed isPolicyExpenseChat(prevReport)(isPolicyExpenseChat(prevReport) && !prevReport?.isOwnPolicyExpenseChat) to exclude own workspace chats from triggering the Concierge redirect
  • Effect 2 guard: added early return using the ref to block navigation for own workspace chats; added Navigation.dismissModal() + Navigation.popToSidebar() stack cleanup before genuine Concierge redirects to prevent the infinite loop

ReportFetchHandler.tsx

  • Same isCurrentRouteOwnWorkspaceChatRef ref pattern to survive the Onyx wipe window
  • New useEffect that detects the wipe (prevReportID === reportIDFromRoute && !report?.reportID) and calls fetchReport() to restore data — without this, the screen stays as a blank loading skeleton after the wipe

useSidebarOrderedReports.tsx

  • Added isCurrentReportOwnWorkspaceChatRef ref with synchronous render update
  • Added || isCurrentReportOwnWorkspaceChatRef.current to the narrow-layout force-inclusion condition so the workspace chat stays visible in the LHN on mobile during the wipe window

Known limitation: A ~2 second visual flicker on web LHN still occurs as an artifact of the Onyx SET timing. A full fix requires the server to switch from SET to MERGE for this update (backend change outside scope of this PR).

Fixed Issues

$ #84248
PROPOSAL: #84248 (comment)

Tests

Preconditions — set up 4 accounts:

  1. As workspace owner: invite Account B (Approver), Account C (Vacation delegate), Account D (Submitter). Set Account B as approver in Workflows.
  2. As Account B: set Account C as Vacation delegate in Profile → Status.

Test steps:

  1. Sign in as Account D. Navigate to the workspace chat.
  2. Create an expense in the workspace chat and tap Submit. Stay in the workspace chat.
  3. On a second device, sign in as Account C. Open the submitted expense.
  4. As Account C: tap More → Split, split the expense into two equal parts.
  5. On Account D's device verify:
    • Account D is not navigated away to Concierge chat
    • The workspace chat remains visible in the LHN on mobile
    • The workspace chat content loads correctly (no blank loading skeleton)
    • No infinite navigation loop when pressing Back
  6. Delete a different report and verify genuine deletions still navigate to Concierge correctly (regression check)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Follow preconditions above.
  2. On Account D's device, disable network after submitting the expense (step 2).
  3. Re-enable network and have Account C perform the split.
  4. Verify the workspace chat remains visible in the LHN after reconnecting.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

QA Steps

Same as Tests section above.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
WhatsApp.Video.2026-03-25.at.23.54.53.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome

Video shows Account D on Android staying in workspace chat after Account C splits the expense. Same behavior verified on
Android mWeb Chrome shown in attached video above

iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@neerajbachani neerajbachani requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2026 11:49
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and suneox April 1, 2026 11:49
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 1, 2026

@suneox Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed request for a team April 1, 2026 11:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2026

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@neerajbachani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

// Track whether the current route is an own workspace chat (isOwnPolicyExpenseChat).
// Must be a ref set synchronously during render — by the time the navigation effects fire
// after a delegate split, the server SET has wiped report/prevReport in Onyx so we can't
// rely on live state or usePrevious. See issue #84248.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

The isCurrentRouteOwnWorkspaceChatRef ref-tracking pattern (declare ref, update synchronously during render based on report/reportID, preserve last-known value on wipe) is duplicated almost identically in three files:

  • src/pages/inbox/ReportScreen.tsx (lines 361-370)
  • src/pages/inbox/ReportFetchHandler.tsx (lines 73-78, 107-113)
  • src/hooks/useSidebarOrderedReports.tsx (lines 91-103)

The ReportScreen.tsx and ReportFetchHandler.tsx versions are nearly character-for-character identical. Extract this into a shared custom hook (e.g., useIsOwnWorkspaceChatRef(report, reportIDFromRoute)) that encapsulates the ref, the synchronous render-time update, and the wipe-preservation logic. Each consumer would then call the hook and read .current as needed.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extracted into useIsOwnWorkspaceChatRef hook, duplication removed. Updated


const isTransactionThreadView = isReportTransactionThread(report);

// Update the ref synchronously each render so the re-fetch effect below can read it
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

This ref-tracking block is nearly identical to the one in ReportScreen.tsx (lines 361-370). Both check report?.reportID, compare against reportIDFromRoute, set isOwnPolicyExpenseChat, and intentionally preserve the last-known value when the report is wiped. Extract a shared hook such as useIsOwnWorkspaceChatRef(report, reportIDFromRoute) that returns the ref, so both files can consume it without duplicating the logic.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

useEffect(() => {
const wasJustWiped = !!prevReportID && prevReportID === reportIDFromRoute && !report?.reportID;
if (!wasJustWiped || !isCurrentRouteOwnWorkspaceChatRef.current) {
return;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-5 (docs)

The eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps on line 183 lacks a justification comment explaining why certain dependencies (likely fetchReport) are omitted. Even though fetchReport is created via useEffectEvent (and is therefore stable), this should be documented for future readers.

Add a comment above or on the same line, for example:

// fetchReport is a stable useEffectEvent callback and does not need to be listed as a dependency.
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added justification comment above the eslint-disable line. Updated

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc08632d60

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +589 to +590
if (isCurrentRouteOwnWorkspaceChatRef.current) {
return;
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep deletion redirect for truly removed own workspace chats

This early return blocks all reportWasDeleted handling whenever the current route was previously marked isOwnPolicyExpenseChat, so if an own workspace chat is genuinely removed (for example, policy/workspace access is revoked), we now skip both parent-report and Concierge fallback navigation and can leave the user on a dead report route. Since this commit also excluded own policy chats from the other removal effect, there is no remaining redirect path for real deletions of that chat type.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Valid concern, replaced the blunt early return with a 500ms deferred navigation. Temporary delegate wipe: re-fetch restores the report before the timer fires so reportWasDeleted resets to false and navigation is cancelled. Genuine deletion: report stays gone, timer fires, navigation proceeds correctly. Updated

@suneox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

suneox commented Apr 4, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@neerajbachani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Checklist Notes

  • Localization: N/A - no new user-facing text added
  • Unit tests: N/A - Onyx wipe/re-fetch timing behavior not reliably unit testable without server simulation
  • Storybook: N/A - no component stories modified
  • Design label: N/A - no UI layout changes
  • Deeplink: N/A - no new pages or deeplink routes added
  • New assets: N/A - no assets added or modified
  • CSS styles: N/A - no new styles added
  • Marketing copy: N/A - no new copy added
  • New code pattern: useIsOwnWorkspaceChatRef hook pattern discussed and extracted per github-actions bot suggestion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants