Skip to content

Use a larger button for multi-select on web#88146

Open
shawnborton wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
shawn-multiSelect
Open

Use a larger button for multi-select on web#88146
shawnborton wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
shawn-multiSelect

Conversation

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shawnborton shawnborton commented Apr 16, 2026

Explanation of Change

This makes the "X selected" button for bulk editing use a larger size:

CleanShot.2026-04-17.at.09.16.14.mp4

Fixed Issues

$ #88176
PROPOSAL: N/A - fixed by internal Designgineer

Tests

  • Use same steps as QA

Offline tests

  • N/A: this is just changing the size of a button, everything else should work the same as it currently does.

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Select expense rows or report rows from the Reports page
  • Make sure the X selected button uses our larger size (40px tall)
  • Make sure the table doesn't jump around
  • Make sure no changes to mobile are seen

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct) — N/A, no new inputs or error states
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline) — N/A, styling-only change with no offline behavior
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability). — N/A, styling-only change
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick) — N/A, no callbacks changed
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory — N/A, changes are self-explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing. — N/A, no comments changed
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation methodN/A, no new copy
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message: — N/A
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methodsN/A
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue) — N/A, no new copy
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README. — N/A, no new files
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed — N/A, no JSDoc changes
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers — N/A
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected) — QA steps cover both expense rows and report rows
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such — N/A
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly — N/A, no argument changes
  • If any new file was added I verified that: — N/A, no new files
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that: — No new style added, only modified existing searchBulkActionsButton
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that: — N/A
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic. — N/A
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases) — Changes are scoped to SearchBulkActionsButton only
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected. — Storybook tests pass
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account. — N/A, bulk actions button is not deeplink-accessible
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other. — N/A, no form inputs
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. — N/A
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow. — This is a styling-only change, unit tests aren't applicable
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps. — N/A

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CleanShot.2026-04-17.at.09.16.14.mp4

@shawnborton shawnborton self-assigned this Apr 16, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @shawnborton has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

…ctions button

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @shawnborton has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note that I did get this feedback:

The cleanest fix would be to set a fixed height on the searchBulkActionsButton wrapper that matches the filters bar row height (likely variables.componentSizeSmall or componentSizeNormal), center the button content vertically with justifyContent: 'center', and drop the marginVertical entirely. That way both the selected and non-selected states occupy the same vertica space — no layout shift, no negative margin hack.

But I actually feel like the negative margin trick is the most simple, straightforward way to handle this without needing to reconfigure those filter wrappers.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MelvinBot can you help me fill out the PR author checklist please?

@MelvinBot

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@shawnborton shawnborton marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2026 07:22
@shawnborton shawnborton requested review from a team as code owners April 17, 2026 07:22
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from thelullabyy April 17, 2026 07:22
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 17, 2026

@thelullabyy Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from trjExpensify and removed request for a team April 17, 2026 07:22
@thelullabyy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shawnborton I'm reviewer of this PR, could you please add me as assignee so I can talk directly with Melvin for updates. Thx

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cc @luacmartins @JS00001 @Expensify/design @JmillsExpensify

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I will handle the updates with Melvin as the PR author, you can stay on as a reviewer though.

Comment thread src/styles/index.ts

searchBulkActionsButton: {
marginVertical: 3,
marginVertical: -3,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The value -3 is a magic number with no explanation of why this specific value is used. Negative margins are especially worth documenting since they are an unusual layout technique that can cause clipping or overlap issues. The previous value 3 was also a magic number, but switching to a negative margin makes the intent even less clear.

Define a named constant or add a comment explaining why -3 is the correct value. For example:

// Negative margin compensates for the larger default button size
// to keep the bulk actions bar at the same height
const SEARCH_BULK_ACTIONS_BUTTON_VERTICAL_OFFSET = -3;

searchBulkActionsButton: {
    marginVertical: SEARCH_BULK_ACTIONS_BUTTON_VERTICAL_OFFSET,
},

Reviewed at: ed27170 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot can you implement that suggestion?

Can you also explain in that comment that we arrived at that number because the current height of the view is 34. The bigger button is 40, which is 6 more. That means we need to pull the button up by half of the difference, so 6/2 is 3.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot you are an assignee now, please retry this request

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ed2717099b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

) : (
<View style={[styles.flexRow, styles.gap3]}>
<View style={[styles.flexRow, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.gap3]}>
<ButtonWithDropdownMenu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restrict larger bulk-action button size to web only

Removing buttonSize={CONST.DROPDOWN_BUTTON_SIZE.SMALL} here makes ButtonWithDropdownMenu fall back to MEDIUM for every wide-layout client, not just web. SearchPage chooses wide vs narrow using shouldUseNarrowLayout (width-based), so iOS/Android tablets also execute this path and get the larger control (plus the accompanying spacing offset in styles.searchBulkActionsButton), which conflicts with the stated goal of a web-only visual tweak and can regress native tablet layout consistency.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I don't mean web-only, I actually mean wide screen only. So I think we're good here.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'd be happy to add that comment explaining the marginVertical: -3 value, but I can't push changes to this PR because I didn't open it and I'm not listed as an assignee.

To have me make this fix, add me (MelvinBot) to the PR assignees and then retry your request.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I've updated the PR body with the filled-out author checklist. All N/A items are checked with explanations.

Items left unchecked that need your action:

  1. Screenshots/videos on all platforms — only macOS is included so far
  2. Platform testing — Android (Native + mWeb) and iOS (Native + mWeb) still need testing
  3. Design label — since this PR changes button sizing, consider adding the Design label

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MelvinBot In src/styles/index.ts on line 4904: please define a named constant or add a comment explaining why -3 is the correct value. For example:

// Negative margin compensates for the larger default button size
// to keep the bulk actions bar at the same height
const SEARCH_BULK_ACTIONS_BUTTON_VERTICAL_OFFSET = -3;

searchBulkActionsButton: {
marginVertical: SEARCH_BULK_ACTIONS_BUTTON_VERTICAL_OFFSET,
},

Can you also explain in that comment that we arrived at that number because the current height of the view is 34. The bigger button is 40, which is 6 more. That means we need to pull the button up by half of the difference, so 6/2 is 3.

The filter bar row is 34px and the larger button is 40px, so we
offset by half the difference ((40-34)/2 = 3) to prevent layout shift.

Co-authored-by: Shawn Borton <shawnborton@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added an inline comment explaining the -3 value:

// The filter bar row is 34px tall, but the default (larger) bulk-action button is 40px.
// To keep the bar from growing, we pull the button up/down by half the difference: (40 - 34) / 2 = 3.

I kept the value inline rather than extracting a named constant since it's only used in this one spot and the comment makes the reasoning clear. Let me know if you'd still prefer the constant approach.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@thelullabyy feel free to start final review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@thelullabyy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@thelullabyy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot You completed 43 out of 50 checklist items with 7 unfinished items in PR author checklist. Please finish

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The remaining 7 unchecked items require action from the PR author — I can't check them off automatically. Here's a breakdown:

Can likely be checked off by shawnborton with a note:

  • Screenshots/videos on all platforms and Android/iOS platform testing — The code change only affects the !shouldUseNarrowLayout branch (SearchBulkActionsButton.tsx:173), so mobile renders an entirely different code path. You could check these off with a note like "N/A — change only affects wide/desktop layout", or add a quick mobile screenshot showing no change.

Needs action:

  • Design label — Since this PR changes button sizing/spacing, the Design label should be added and/or @Expensify/design tagged for review. This is the one item I'd recommend actually completing rather than marking N/A.

@shawnborton shawnborton changed the title [POC] Using a larger button for multi-select on web Use a larger button for multi-select on web Apr 17, 2026
@shawnborton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated the checklist and the PR name.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a good incremental step! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants