[No QA] [NO QA] Docs updates for E/A#86938 Add undelete and deleted expense filter docs

[stephanieelliott]

Replaces: #88028

[github-actions]

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR adds documentation for the new "undelete" expense feature across three files: a new procedural section in How-to-Delete-Expenses.md, a table row in Expense-and-Report-Actions.md, and a filter value addition in Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page.md. The changes are focused, well-scoped, and generally follow governance standards. The PR also corrects previously non-compliant absolute URLs to relative links, which is a welcome fix.

Scores Summary

• Readability: 9/10 - Steps are clear, sequential, and action-oriented. The new "How to find and undelete deleted expenses" section is concise and easy to follow. The table row in Expense-and-Report-Actions.md is slightly dense but functional.
• AI Readiness: 9/10 - The new section heading is properly task-based ("How to find and undelete deleted expenses"). Keywords and internalScope metadata are updated with relevant search phrases (undelete expense, restore deleted expense, find deleted expenses). YAML frontmatter is complete.
• Style Compliance: 8/10 - Navigation instructions correctly use the unified pattern. Button and UI element names are bolded. However, the Undelete row in the Expense-and-Report-Actions.md table uses plain text for UI references ("Reports > Expenses with Status = Deleted filter") where UI element names should be bolded per naming conventions.

Key Findings

• The new procedural section in How-to-Delete-Expenses.md follows the step formatting standard well, with clear numbered steps and proper UI element bolding.
• Converting three absolute URLs (help.expensify.com) to relative links aligns with the cross-linking governance rule requiring relative links only. This is a positive correction of prior non-compliance.
• The Undelete row added to the Expense-and-Report-Actions.md table describes the condition as "On deleted expenses (accessible via Reports > Expenses with Status = Deleted filter)" -- the UI element references within this description (Reports, Expenses, Status, Deleted) are not bolded, which is inconsistent with the naming conventions governance requiring exact UI labels to use bold formatting.
• Keywords and internalScope updates are thorough and reflect realistic search queries.

Recommendations

1. In Expense-and-Report-Actions.md, consider bolding UI element names within the Undelete row's condition column (e.g., "accessible via Reports > Expenses with Status = Deleted filter") to match the naming conventions governance. Note: this is a minor issue given the table format constraints, and existing rows in this table follow the same plain-text pattern, so this may be an intentional table-wide convention.
2. No other blocking issues found. The changes are well-structured and governance-compliant.

Files Reviewed

• docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Expense-and-Report-Actions.md - One row added to actions table. Minor UI bolding gap noted.
• docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page.md - "Deleted" added to Status filter examples. Clean change.
• docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Delete-Expenses.md - New "How to find and undelete deleted expenses" section added, metadata updated, absolute URLs converted to relative links. Well-executed.

Note: Detailed line-by-line feedback has been provided as inline comments where applicable.

[OSBotify]

A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://f65844f6.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️

Updated articles:

• articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Expense-and-Report-Actions
• articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page
• articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Delete-Expenses

[melvin-bot]

Concierge reviewer checklist:

• I have verified the accuracy of the article
  • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
  • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
  • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
• I have verified the readability of the article
  • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
  • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
  • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
• I have verified the formatting of the article
  • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
  • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
• I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
  • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
  • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
• I have verified the overall quality of the article
  • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
  • The article fully addresses user needs.
• I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @CortneyOfstad

[melvin-bot]

@CortneyOfstad Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[stephanieelliott]

@MelvinBot fix the spelling errors

[MelvinBot]

The spellcheck failure has 2 typos in docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Expense-and-Report-Actions.md:

1. Line 5, col 52: overiew → overview
2. Line 105, col 17: Oustanding → Outstanding

⚠️ I can't push changes to this PR because I didn't open it and I'm not listed as an assignee. To have me make this fix, add me to the PR assignees and then retry your request.