Skip to content

Drop "All" from "All reports", "All expenses" in Spend tabs#88900

Merged
JS00001 merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
aimane-chnaif:feature-84881-2
Apr 27, 2026
Merged

Drop "All" from "All reports", "All expenses" in Spend tabs#88900
JS00001 merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
aimane-chnaif:feature-84881-2

Conversation

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif commented Apr 27, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #84881

Tests

  1. Login account
  2. Go to Spend page
  3. Verify that Expenses (originally All expenses), Reports (originally All reports) tabs show in Expense reports section
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-04-27.at.10.01.34.am.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-27.at.10.01.57.am.mov

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

Comment thread src/hooks/useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation.tsx Outdated
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The bug was a sync issue: the modal link text used one translation key (search.tabs.reports → "All reports") while the actual destination tab displayed a different label. Your PR fixes this by pointing both to common.reports.

A good regression test would verify the modal's link text matches the Reports search suggestion label. Add this to tests/unit/useCreateEmptyReportConfirmationTest.tsx:

import {getSuggestedSearches} from '@libs/SearchUIUtils';
import CONST from '@src/CONST';

it('uses the same translation key for the link text as the Reports search suggestion', () => {
    const suggestedSearches = getSuggestedSearches();
    const reportsTranslationPath = suggestedSearches[CONST.SEARCH.SEARCH_KEYS.REPORTS].translationPath;

    const onConfirm = jest.fn();
    renderHook(() =>
        useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation({
            policyID,
            policyName,
            onConfirm,
        }),
    );

    // The modal link text must use the same translation key as the Reports search tab
    expect(mockTranslate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(reportsTranslationPath);
});

This test will fail if anyone changes the translation key in either useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation or getSuggestedSearches without keeping them in sync — which is exactly the class of bug from #88419.

Note: getSuggestedSearches takes optional parameters — you may need to adjust the mock setup depending on its dependencies. If it requires Onyx data, you could alternatively hardcode the assertion as expect(mockTranslate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('common.reports') and add a matching assertion in SearchUIUtilsTest.ts that translationPath === 'common.reports' for the reports key, achieving the same coupling check across two test files.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
see 44 files with indirect coverage changes

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MelvinBot unit test you suggested is failing

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The failure is because getSuggestedSearches from SearchUIUtils.ts has heavy transitive dependencies (React Native components, Onyx, etc.) that aren't mocked in this test file.

Simpler approach: Remove the getSuggestedSearches import and assert the key directly. The existing SearchUIUtilsTest.ts already asserts translationPath: 'common.reports' for the Reports search suggestion (line 6271), so the two tests together will catch any sync drift.

Replace the test with:

it('uses the same translation key for the link text as the Reports search suggestion', () => {
    const onConfirm = jest.fn();
    const {result} = renderHook(() =>
        useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation({
            policyID,
            policyName,
            onConfirm,
        }),
    );

    act(() => {
        result.current.openCreateReportConfirmation();
    });

    // Must match the translationPath in getSuggestedSearches for REPORTS (asserted in SearchUIUtilsTest.ts)
    expect(mockTranslate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('common.reports');
});

And remove the getSuggestedSearches / CONST imports you added (line 4-5). The openCreateReportConfirmation() call is needed because translate('common.reports') happens inside the ConfirmationPrompt component which is rendered as part of showConfirmModal.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

    act(() => {
        result.current.openCreateReportConfirmation();
    });

@MelvinBot ConfirmationPrompt component (which is passed as prompt) is still not rendered

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You're right — ConfirmationPrompt is passed as JSX to showConfirmModal but never mounted, so mockTranslate isn't called with 'common.reports'.

The fix is to render() the captured prompt element after openCreateReportConfirmation():

import {act, render, renderHook} from '@testing-library/react-native';

// ... existing mocks ...

it('modal link text uses the same translation key as the Reports search suggestion', () => {
    const onConfirm = jest.fn();
    const {result} = renderHook(() =>
        useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation({
            policyID,
            policyName,
            onConfirm,
        }),
    );

    act(() => {
        result.current.openCreateReportConfirmation();
    });

    // ConfirmationPrompt is captured but not rendered — render it now
    mockTranslate.mockClear();
    render(lastShowConfirmModalOptions?.prompt as ReactElement);

    // This key must match the translationPath in getSuggestedSearches for REPORTS
    expect(mockTranslate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('common.reports');
});

ConfirmationPrompt calls useLocalize() and useThemeStyles() internally, both of which are already mocked in this test file, so render() will mount it and trigger the translate('common.reports') call.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lastShowConfirmModalOptions is a module-level variable in the existing test file, populated by the jest.mock for useConfirmModal. It's already defined at line 18 and captured at line 23:

let lastShowConfirmModalOptions: ShowConfirmModalOptions | undefined;

jest.mock('@hooks/useConfirmModal', () => () => ({
    showConfirmModal: jest.fn((options: ShowConfirmModalOptions) => {
        lastShowConfirmModalOptions = options;  // captured here
        // ...
    }),
}));

To use it, call openCreateReportConfirmation() inside act(), then read lastShowConfirmModalOptions — same pattern as the existing test at line 71. However, note that lastShowConfirmModalOptions captures the prompt as a React element, not a rendered component — so you can't directly inspect the translate() calls made inside ConfirmationPrompt from it. That's why my earlier suggestion used mockTranslate (the mock at line 30) to assert which translation keys were called, rather than inspecting the modal options.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR looks good. Changes are consistent and complete:

  • search.tabs.reports and search.tabs.expenses are removed from all 10 language files — no remaining references anywhere in the codebase
  • Both SearchUIUtils.ts and useCreateEmptyReportConfirmation.tsx now point to common.reports / common.expenses, which already exist in all language files
  • The new regression test correctly verifies the modal link text stays in sync with the search suggestion label by dynamically reading from getSuggestedSearches rather than hardcoding a string
  • Existing test assertions updated to match the new translation paths

One minor note: getSuggestedSearches() is called with no args in the new test (line 174), which uses the default accountID = CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID. This works because the REPORTS entry doesn't depend on accountID — but if that ever changes, the test would need updating. This is a low-risk edge case and not a blocker.

No issues found.

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif marked this pull request as ready for review April 27, 2026 09:27
@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif requested review from a team as code owners April 27, 2026 09:27
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from bernhardoj and trjExpensify and removed request for a team April 27, 2026 09:27
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

@bernhardoj Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bernhardoj commented Apr 27, 2026

@aimane-chnaif what do you think of keeping the reports and expenses tab keys and just updating it to Reports and Expenses? So if we want to change it later in the future, no need to create a new key (even though we probably will use a new key, but we will also have each tab its own key within the same tabs key)

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ok, I just considered avoid duplicated translations.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment thread src/languages/nl.ts
reports: 'Alle rapporten',
expenses: 'Alle uitgaven',
reports: 'Rapporten',
expenses: 'Declaraties',
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: Isn't this supposed to be Uitgaven (based on the prev translation)

and DeepL
Image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is consistent with:

expenses: 'Declaraties',

other: (count: number) => `${count} declaraties`,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might be right. I also thought that but if we wanna fix this, it should be global fix which is out of scope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see, all good

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bernhardoj commented Apr 27, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from JS00001 April 27, 2026 12:47
@JS00001 JS00001 merged commit 610c06f into Expensify:main Apr 27, 2026
54 of 60 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @JS00001 has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.3.62-13 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, help site changes are required. PR #88900 renames the Spend tab labels from "All reports"/"All expenses" to "Reports"/"Expenses", and 3 navigation references in the help docs still use the old names.

Draft PR created: #89011

Changes in docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Approve-Expenses.md:

  • Spend > All expensesSpend > Expenses (lines 84, 130)
  • Spend > All reportsSpend > Reports (line 96)

No other help site files reference these as UI labels (the other grep hits are regular English, not UI navigation instructions).

Note: I was unable to add the PR to project 196 due to permissions — please add it manually:

gh project item-add 196 --owner Expensify --url https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/89011

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.3.63-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, help site changes are required. The Approve-Expenses.md article references the old Spend tab labels "All reports" and "All expenses" in 3 places.

Draft PR created: #89015

Changes made to docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Approve-Expenses.md:

  • "Spend > All expenses" → "Spend > Expenses" (2 occurrences: hold an expense, reject an expense)
  • "Spend > All reports" → "Spend > Reports" (1 occurrence: unapprove a report)

No other help site articles reference these tab labels as UI navigation instructions.

Note: I was unable to add the PR to the GitHub project 196 due to permissions. Please add it manually: gh project item-add 196 --owner Expensify --url https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/89015

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.3.64-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, help site changes are required. PR #88900 renames the Spend tabs from "All reports" → "Reports" and "All expenses" → "Expenses", and there are 3 navigation references in docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Approve-Expenses.md that use these as UI labels:

  • Line 84: **Spend > All expenses****Spend > Expenses**
  • Line 96: **Spend > All reports****Spend > Reports**
  • Line 130: **Spend > All expenses****Spend > Expenses**

Draft PR created: #89025

⚠️ I was unable to add the PR to GitHub project 196 due to permissions. Please add it manually:

gh project item-add 196 --owner Expensify --url https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/89025

@arosiclair arosiclair mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants