Skip to content

[No QA] Lydia update unreported flow#90535

Open
lydiabarclay wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
Lydia-update-unreported-flow
Open

[No QA] Lydia update unreported flow#90535
lydiabarclay wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
Lydia-update-unreported-flow

Conversation

@lydiabarclay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lydiabarclay lydiabarclay commented May 13, 2026

Explanation of Change

Updating three articles in the context of unreported expense flow updates

Fixed Issues

https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/533133

no tests

Updated the guide on managing expenses in reports to provide clearer instructions on adding, deleting, and editing expenses, as well as collaboration features.
Updated references from 'Expensify' to 'New Expensify' and made minor adjustments for clarity.
Updated content for clarity and consistency throughout the Spend page guide, including rephrasing sentences and adjusting formatting for better readability.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@lydiabarclay lydiabarclay requested a review from a team May 13, 2026 16:05
**Note:** The bulk action menu appears after selecting at least one expense.

## Steps to Move Expenses Between Reports
## Moving Expenses Between Reports
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading violation: ## Moving Expenses Between Reports uses a gerund rather than starting with an action verb or question word. Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, headings must be task-based.

Suggested fix: ## How to move expenses between reports

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stephanieelliott same question here: this was also authored by the SDO originally. Have guidelines since changed or is GH off the beam here too?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this a another one where I would accept the bot's suggestion - the headings should be task-based!

- The expense appears in the table
- Its row is briefly highlighted as new
- Once added, the **Submit** button appears in the header (replacing **Add expense**, which moves to the **More** menu)
## Adding a New Expense to the Table
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading violation: ## Adding a New Expense to the Table uses a gerund rather than starting with an action verb or question word. Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, headings must be task-based.

Suggested fix: ## How to add a new expense to the table

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 13, 2026

Concierge reviewer checklist:

  • I have verified the accuracy of the article
    • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
    • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
    • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
  • I have verified the readability of the article
    • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
    • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
    • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
  • I have verified the formatting of the article
    • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
    • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
  • I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
    • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
    • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
  • I have verified the overall quality of the article
    • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
    • The article fully addresses user needs.
  • I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @twisterdotcom

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from twisterdotcom and removed request for a team May 13, 2026 16:05
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 13, 2026

@twisterdotcom Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR updates three articles in the reports-and-expenses section: Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page, Managing-Expenses-in-a-Report, and Track-Expenses. The changes improve sentence clarity, add punctuation consistency (trailing periods on list items), and introduce useful content (Tags column, Comments and Collaboration section, expanded tracked-expense options). However, several proposed heading changes move away from governance compliance rather than toward it, and metadata gaps remain unaddressed.

Scores Summary

  • Readability: 8/10 - The proposed changes generally improve clarity. Bullet lists now have consistent punctuation, intro paragraphs are tightened, and steps are cleaner. Minor issues: a duplicate sentence in Managing-Expenses ("Each report includes a table" / "Each report includes an expense table") and step numbering jumps (steps go 1-2-3-5 in Track-Expenses due to inserted sub-bullets).
  • AI Readiness: 4/10 - Multiple proposed heading changes replace task-based headings with noun-only or gerund headings, reducing searchability and retrieval precision. All three files continue to lack internalScope in YAML metadata. Track-Expenses keywords are not in array format. Multiple # headings (beyond # FAQ) persist in two files.
  • Style Compliance: 5/10 - References to More (e.g., "Click More > Add expense") violate the three dots menu rule, which requires "Select the three dots (vertical-ellipsis)" phrasing. A full URL is used for cross-linking instead of a relative path. Some new headings lack feature names.

Key Findings

Heading Regressions (HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2)
The following proposed heading changes replace compliant task-based headings with non-compliant noun-only or gerund forms:

  • # How to Use Filters to Find Reports and Expenses changed to # Filters (noun-only, no action verb or question word)
  • # How to Use Smart Suggestions changed to # Smart Suggestions (noun-only)
  • ## Smart Suggestion Locations changed to ## Where they appear (missing feature name)
  • ## Steps to Move Expenses Between Reports changed to ## Moving Expenses Between Reports (gerund instead of action verb)
  • ## Add a New Expense to the Table changed to ## Adding a New Expense to the Table (gerund)
  • ## How to View and Use the Expense Table changed to ## Understanding the Expense Table (gerund)
  • New heading ## Comments and Collaboration is noun-only
  • New heading ## Benefits is generic and noun-only

Multiple # Headings (HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 4)
Governance requires exactly one # heading (the article title) plus optional # FAQ. Two of the three files use multiple # headings for content sections. This pre-exists in the Spend Page article but is newly introduced in Track-Expenses (# Where to Find Tracked Expenses, # What You Can Do With Tracked Expenses).

Missing internalScope Metadata (HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 3)
None of the three files include internalScope in their YAML frontmatter. This is a required field per the authoring guidelines.

Three Dots Menu Violations (HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md)
Multiple references use More (e.g., "Click More > Add expense"). The naming conventions explicitly prohibit calling it "More" and require: Select the three dots (vertical-ellipsis).

Full URL Instead of Relative Link (HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 7)
Managing-Expenses-in-a-Report and Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page use full https://help.expensify.com/... URLs for cross-links. Governance requires relative links only.

Positive Aspects

  • Consistent trailing punctuation on list items across all three files
  • Improved intro paragraph in Getting-Started (more focused, less marketing-like)
  • Useful content additions: Tags column mention, Comments and Collaboration section, expanded tracked-expense action options
  • Track-Expenses description updated from "Expensify" to "New Expensify" for product clarity
  • FAQ questions rewritten to be more user-centric (e.g., "Can someone comment on a report?" is clearer than "How do comments work on a report?")
  • Step instructions improved with clearer context (e.g., "Choose yourself under Personal")

Track-Expenses Step Numbering
Steps in both SmartScan and Manual sections jump from 3 to 5 (skipping 4) due to inserted sub-bullets. These should be renumbered sequentially.

Recommendations

  1. Restore task-based headings - Revert noun-only and gerund headings back to action-verb or question-word forms per Section 2 of the authoring guidelines. For example: # Filters should be # How to use filters to find reports and expenses, ## Benefits should be ## How Smart Suggestions help you report faster.
  2. Add internalScope to all three files - This is a required YAML metadata field. Define the audience, covered workflow, and explicit exclusions for each article.
  3. Replace "More" with three dots notation - All instances of **More** referring to the overflow menu should use the three dots (vertical-ellipsis) per naming conventions.
  4. Convert full URLs to relative links - Replace https://help.expensify.com/articles/... with relative paths like /articles/....
  5. Fix step numbering in Track-Expenses - Renumber steps sequentially (1-2-3-4-5 instead of 1-2-3-5).
  6. Reduce multiple # headings - In Track-Expenses, demote # Where to Find Tracked Expenses and # What You Can Do With Tracked Expenses to ## headings. Same pattern should be addressed in the Spend Page article.
  7. Fix duplicate sentence in Managing-Expenses - The "Each report includes..." line appears twice in the expense table section after the proposed changes.
  8. Fix Track-Expenses keywords format - Keywords should be in array format [keyword1, keyword2] per the template.

Files Reviewed

  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page.md - Heading regressions, missing internalScope, More menu references, full URL cross-link
  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Managing-Expenses-in-a-Report.md - Good structural improvements, but has duplicate sentence, missing internalScope, More menu references, full URL cross-link
  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md - Good content additions, but step numbering errors, new multiple # headings, missing internalScope, keywords format

Review based on governance files: HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md, and TEMPLATE.md.

---

## How to View and Use the Expense Table
## Understanding the Expense Table
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading violation: ## Understanding the Expense Table uses a gerund rather than starting with an action verb or question word. Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, all ## headings must be task-based.

The previous heading ## How to View and Use the Expense Table was already compliant. Consider keeping it, or use something like ## How to view and use the expense table.

Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md
You can also combine filters with a keyword search for even more precision. For example, searching **"Uber in March"** will show only Uber rides from March.

**Note:** If you haven't applied any filters yet, you'll see your **most recent unreported expenses** by default.
**Note**: If no filters are applied, the page defaults to showing your most recent unreported expenses.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB but maybe noting this is all expenses, sorted by most recent?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it accurate that with no filters, it shows your most recent unreported expenses at the top? In my test account it looks like it's just my most recent expenses, reported or not

Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dylanexpensify dylanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Notes left, but no blockers

Clarified workspace admin permissions and updated instructions for moving expenses between reports.
@OSBotify

This comment has been minimized.

@lydiabarclay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@stephanieelliott just awaiting your review and then I think we can merge!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stephanieelliott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approved! Not sure if this feature is released so I will hold on merging, but anyone should be able to do it (or feel free to ping me if not!)


# How to Use Filters to Find Reports and Expenses
Filters help you narrow down expenses or reports so you can find exactly what you needfast. This is especially useful when you're working with a large dataset or trying to take specific actions, such as reporting unsubmitted expenses.
## How to use filters to find reports and expenses
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading hierarchy violation: This heading was demoted from # to ##, which is good. However, per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 4, articles must have "exactly one # heading (the article title). No other # headings are allowed except # FAQ." This file still has # Report Previews (line 11) and # Report Tables (line 38) as additional # headings. Since this PR is restructuring headings, consider also demoting those two # headings to ## to bring the article into compliance.

---

# How to Use Smart Suggestions
## How to use Smart Suggestions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading hierarchy violation: This ## How to use Smart Suggestions heading now sits under the --- divider after the filters section, making it a peer-level ## section. However, ## Where Smart Suggestions appear (line 130) and ## How Smart Suggestions help you report faster (line 136) read as sub-sections of this topic. Since only # and ## headings are allowed (no ###), consider restructuring so these sub-topics are folded into the content of a single ## heading rather than appearing as separate peer-level sections.

Smart suggestions recommend the next best action based on your activity.

Smart suggestions recommend the next best action—like submitting a report or adding unreported expenses—based on your activity.
## Where Smart Suggestions appear
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading rule violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, all ## headings must start with an action verb or question word (How, What, Where, Who, Why, When). "Where Smart Suggestions appear" starts with "Where" so the question-word requirement is met, but this heading reads as a noun-phrase label rather than a task the user performs. Consider rephrasing to be more task-oriented, e.g., ## Where to find Smart Suggestions in New Expensify.

- Create report
- An existing draft report
- Remove from report
5. Expenses are moved, and a system message logs the action.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Numbering error: Step numbering jumps from 3 to 5 (step 4 is missing). This also occurs at line 82 in the "From the expense details" section. Please renumber sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4).

- Create report
- An existing draft report
- Remove from report
5. Expense is moved, and a system message logs the action.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Numbering error: Step numbering jumps from 3 to 5. Please renumber sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4).

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR improves three articles in the reports-and-expenses section: Getting Started with the Spend Page, Managing Expenses in a Report, and Track Expenses. The changes make meaningful progress on heading quality, conciseness, and step clarity. Several headings have been correctly converted from noun-based labels to task-based phrasing, and redundant content has been trimmed. However, structural governance violations remain in the diff -- particularly around heading hierarchy, missing metadata, and a few naming convention gaps.

Scores Summary

  • Readability: 8/10 - The proposed changes improve clarity and scannability throughout. Steps are better organized (e.g., splitting "move expenses" into two paths), bullet lists are more consistent, and prose is tighter. Minor issues: step numbering jumps from 3 to 5 in two places (Spend Page, "How to move expenses between reports"), and the "How to add a new expense to the table" section reads as a description of behavior rather than actionable steps.
  • AI Readiness: 5/10 - All three files are missing the required internalScope YAML field per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 3. The Spend Page article retains multiple # headings (# Report Previews, # Report Tables) beyond the allowed single # title plus # FAQ. A ### heading (### Available Filters in New Expensify) is introduced/retained, which is forbidden. Several non-task-based ## headings remain in the diff. These issues reduce semantic retrieval quality.
  • Style Compliance: 7/10 - UI element bolding is generally correct. The cross-link in the FAQ section uses a full URL (https://help.expensify.com/...) instead of a relative link as required by HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 7. Some headings introduced in the diff do not start with an action verb or question word as required (e.g., ## Preview Details, ## Preview Behavior and Updates). The term "SelfDM" is used but may not match the exact UI label.

Key Findings

Structural violations in the proposed changes:

  • Multiple # headings: The Spend Page article uses # Report Previews, # Report Tables, and # FAQ. Governance requires exactly one # (article title) plus an optional # FAQ. The other # headings should be demoted to ##.
  • Forbidden ### heading: ### Available Filters in New Expensify in the Spend Page article. Only # and ## are permitted.
  • Missing internalScope: None of the three files include the required internalScope metadata field. While this is a pre-existing gap (not introduced by this PR), the diff touches the YAML area of Track-Expenses and could address it.
  • Step numbering error: In the Spend Page article, both "From the report table" and "From the expense details" sequences jump from step 3 to step 5.

Non-task-based headings introduced or retained in the diff:

  • ## Visibility of Report Previews -- should be e.g., "## Who can see report previews"
  • ## Preview Details -- should be e.g., "## What report previews show"
  • ## Preview Behavior and Updates -- should be e.g., "## How report previews update"
  • ## Table structure and fields -- should be e.g., "## What the report table shows"
  • ## Available Actions on the Table -- should be e.g., "## What you can do in the report table"

Positive aspects:

  • Excellent heading conversions: ## Steps to Move Expenses Between Reports to ## How to move expenses between reports, ## Option 1: SmartScan a Receipt to ## How to SmartScan a receipt, # Locate and Manage Tracked Expenses to ## Where to find tracked expenses.
  • Demoting # How to Use Filters and # How to Use Smart Suggestions to ## is the correct structural fix.
  • Content is more concise and actionable throughout all three files.
  • FAQ questions are well-phrased and answer real user queries.
  • New content additions (tags column, comments/collaboration section, workspace-dependent expense fields) add genuine value.

Cross-linking violation:

  • The FAQ in the Spend Page uses a full URL: [export filtered reports to CSV](https://help.expensify.com/articles/...). Governance requires relative links only.

Recommendations

  1. Fix heading hierarchy (high priority): Demote # Report Previews and # Report Tables to ## in the Spend Page article. Remove or demote the ### Available Filters in New Expensify heading to a bold label or integrate it into the parent section.
  2. Convert remaining non-task-based headings: Apply action-verb or question-word phrasing to ## Visibility of Report Previews, ## Preview Details, ## Preview Behavior and Updates, ## Table structure and fields, and ## Available Actions on the Table.
  3. Fix step numbering: Correct the 3-to-5 jump in both "move expenses" instruction sets in the Spend Page article.
  4. Add internalScope metadata: Add the required field to all three files' YAML frontmatter.
  5. Use relative links: Convert the full URL in the Spend Page FAQ to a relative path.
  6. Verify "SelfDM" terminology: Confirm this matches the exact UI label; if the product says "Self DM" or something else, update accordingly.

Files Reviewed

  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Getting-Started-with-the-Spend-Page.md -- Good content improvements; structural heading hierarchy issues remain (multiple # headings, one ###, non-task-based ## headings, step numbering error).
  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Managing-Expenses-in-a-Report.md -- Solid improvements to steps, FAQ, and new collaboration section. Minor heading casing inconsistency and missing internalScope.
  • docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Track-Expenses.md -- Strong heading conversions and useful new content about workspace-dependent fields. Missing internalScope and minor style points.

Note: Some of the heading hierarchy and metadata issues flagged above are pre-existing in the files. However, since this PR substantively revises these articles, it is an ideal opportunity to bring them into full governance compliance.

---

## How to View and Use the Expense Table
## How to view and use the expense table
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading style violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, all headings must be task-based and start with an action verb or question word. "How to view and use the expense table" starts with "How to" which is good, but the heading uses lowercase. More importantly, the content below has a redundancy issue -- see next comment on line 96/98.

- Category
- Amount
- Workspace violations (if applicable)
Each report includes an expense table showing:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Readability issue: Lines 96 and 98 are nearly identical -- "Each report includes a table showing all attached expenses." and "Each report includes an expense table showing:". Remove the redundant sentence on line 96 and keep only the one that introduces the bullet list.

Clicking a row opens the full expense in a side panel (web) or details screen (mobile).
Clicking a row opens the full expense details in a side panel (web) or details screen (mobile).

## How to use comments and collaboration on a report
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI readiness / heading specificity: Consider including the feature name in this heading for better search retrieval. For example: ## How to use comments and collaboration on an expense report -- this helps AI retrieval match the heading to user queries about expense report comments.

## Why don’t I see the option to move or remove expenses?

You’ll only see the Move or Remove options if you created the report. Workspace Admins can also help with this if needed.
## Why can’t I find a report I just created?
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading rule: "Why can't I find a report I just created?" is acceptable in the FAQ section since # FAQ is exempt from task-based heading rules. However, note that the previous FAQ questions this replaces ("Why can't I delete an expense from a report?", "Why don't I see the option to move or remove expenses?", etc.) covered common user scenarios that are no longer addressed. Consider whether those removed questions should be preserved or merged into the new FAQ entries, since removing them reduces the article's searchability for those queries.

---

Easily add, delete, or move expenses within reports in New Expensify. This guide covers how to manage expenses using the expense table on both web and mobile.
Managing expenses in reports helps you keep everything organized and ready for approval, payment, or export. This guide covers adding, moving, deleting, and editing expenses, as well as understanding audit trails and collaboration.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Metadata violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 3 and TEMPLATE.md, the YAML frontmatter must include an internalScope field that specifies the target audience and workflow scope. Example:

internalScope: Audience is members and Workspace Admins. Covers managing expenses within reports. Does not cover creating reports or submitting for reimbursement.

---

# Locate and Manage Tracked Expenses
## Where to find tracked expenses
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading rule: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, headings must be task-based and start with an action verb or question word. "Where to find tracked expenses" starts with "Where" which satisfies the question-word requirement. However, consider making it more specific for AI retrieval: ## Where to find tracked expenses in New Expensify.


After tracking an expense, it also appears in an **Expense Chat** in the left-hand navigation menu.

## What you can do with tracked expenses
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heading rule violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 2, all headings must start with an action verb or question word (How, What, Where, Who, Why, When). "What you can do with tracked expenses" starts with "What" so it technically qualifies, but the phrasing is vague and generic. Consider a more specific, task-based heading such as ## What actions are available for tracked expenses or ## How to submit or categorize tracked expenses.

**On mobile:**
1. Tap the green camera button and take a photo of the receipt or upload from gallery.
2. Enter the workspace or recipient’s email/phone number.
2. Choose yourself as the recipient under Personal.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UI reference clarity: "Choose yourself as the recipient under Personal" -- is "Personal" the exact UI label? If so, it should be bolded per HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md (bold all UI element labels). Consider: "Choose yourself as the recipient under Personal."

**On desktop:**
1. Click the green receipt button and drag and drop the receipt or click **Choose files** to upload.
2. Enter the workspace or recipient’s email/phone number.
2. Choose yourself as the recipient under Personal.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UI reference clarity: Same as above -- "Personal" should be bolded if it is a UI label: "Choose yourself as the recipient under Personal." This applies to all instances in this file (lines 26, 34, 51, 62).

---

The Spend page in New Expensify gives you a complete view of your submitted, approved, and reimbursed expenses—all in one place. This guide shows you how to use report previews, tables, filters, and smart suggestions to track, manage, and take action on your expenses more efficiently.
The Spend page in New Expensify gives you a full list of your reports and related expenses. From the Spend page you can explore, filter, and export your expense data.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Metadata violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 3 and TEMPLATE.md, the YAML frontmatter must include an internalScope field. This field is missing from the frontmatter. Add something like:

internalScope: Audience is all members. Covers navigating and using the Spend page. Does not cover creating or submitting reports.

---
title: Track Expenses
description: Learn how to create and manage expenses in Expensify without submitting them for reimbursement or approval.
description: Learn how to create and manage expenses in New Expensify without submitting them for reimbursement or approval.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Metadata violation: Per HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 3 and TEMPLATE.md, the YAML frontmatter must include an internalScope field specifying the target audience and scope. This field is missing. Example:

internalScope: Audience is all members. Covers tracking personal expenses without submitting. Does not cover submitting expenses for approval or reimbursement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants