[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#82139 Add receipt upload failure FAQ#90800
Conversation
Documents the new receipt upload error screen introduced in E/A#82139, including the "Save receipt" and "Delete expense" options. Co-authored-by: Olimpia <OlimpiaZurek@users.noreply.github.com>
HelpDot Documentation ReviewOverall AssessmentThis PR adds a single FAQ entry documenting the receipt upload failure screen (from E/A#82139) and expands the keyword list for discoverability. The change is small, focused, and well-written. It fits naturally within the existing article structure. Scores Summary
Key Findings
Recommendations
Files Reviewed
This review assessed only the proposed changes in the diff, not pre-existing content. |
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
HelpDot Documentation ReviewOverall AssessmentThis PR adds a new FAQ entry explaining what to do when a receipt upload fails, including the two user-facing options ("Save receipt" and "Delete expense"). The addition is well-scoped, clearly written, and follows governance conventions with only minor observations. Scores Summary
Key Findings
Recommendations
Files Reviewed
|
|
A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://2fe0f325.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️ Updated articles: |
Concierge reviewer checklist:
For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member? cc @zanyrenney |
|
@zanyrenney Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
|
@stephanieelliott why is it showing this? #90800 (comment) i don't think thats required right? it should just be the conci reviewer one. which i have done! 🎉 |
|
@zanyrenney looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the |
HelpDot Documentation ReviewOverall AssessmentThis PR makes a focused, well-crafted update to the receipts article: it fixes a keyword formatting issue, removes a duplicate keyword entry, adds relevant new search keywords, and introduces a new FAQ entry covering the receipt upload failure scenario. The changes are minor in scope but consistently follow governance standards. Scores Summary
Key Findings
Recommendations
Files Reviewed
This review assessed only the proposed changes in the PR diff, not unchanged portions of the file. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/zanyrenney in version: 9.3.79-1 🚀
Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry): |
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.79-4 🚀
|
Summary
Test plan