Skip to content

Move chat attachments to durable storage before offline queue#90908

Open
MelvinBot wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage
Open

Move chat attachments to durable storage before offline queue#90908
MelvinBot wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot MelvinBot commented May 17, 2026

Explanation of Change

On Android, chat attachments picked from the gallery are copied to cachesDirectory — a temporary directory the OS can purge at any time, especially on force-kill. When the app is killed while offline, the cached file vanishes before the SequentialQueue can replay the upload request, causing the attachment to disappear permanently.

This PR moves the attachment file to durable storage (via moveReceiptToDurableStorage) before building the optimistic report action and queuing the API request. This ensures:

  1. The optimistic HTML references a file path that survives app restarts
  2. The persisted API request's file object has a source property pointing to the durable path, so prepareRequestPayload can re-read it on replay

This is the same mechanism already used by receipt/expense uploads, which don't have this bug. On web, moveReceiptToDurableStorage is a no-op.

Fixed Issues

$ #89553
PROPOSAL: #89553 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open any chat and send a photo attachment while online — verify it sends successfully
  2. Turn off network (airplane mode), send a photo attachment, then force-kill the app
  3. Re-open the app and restore network — verify the attachment uploads successfully and appears in the chat
  4. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Turn off network, send a photo attachment in a chat
  2. Verify the optimistic attachment appears immediately in the chat
  3. Force-kill and reopen the app
  4. Turn network back on — verify the attachment uploads and is visible

QA Steps

  1. On Android, open a chat and send a photo attachment while in airplane mode
  2. Force-kill the app
  3. Re-open the app and disable airplane mode
  4. Verify the attachment uploads successfully and appears in the chat
  5. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

AI Tests

Test Result
npm run prettier ✅ Pass
npm run lint-changed (eslint) ✅ Pass (0 errors, pre-existing warnings only)
npm run typecheck-tsgo ✅ Pass (pre-existing errors in unrelated files only)
npm test -- --silent ⌛ Running in CI
npm run react-compiler-compliance-check check-changed ⚠️ Could not run (no origin/main in CI env)

Chat attachments picked from the gallery are copied to cachesDirectory,
which Android can purge on force-kill. This causes the file to vanish
before the SequentialQueue can replay the upload request.

Use moveReceiptToDurableStorage to relocate the file to a persistent
directory before building the optimistic action and queuing the API
request, and set the source property so prepareRequestPayload can
re-read the file on replay.

Co-authored-by: Yauheni Horbach <ZhenjaHorbach@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team May 17, 2026 11:31
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I created this PR from an upstream branch since I don't have push access to your fork.

To take ownership of this branch and be able to push updates, run:

git remote add upstream https://github.com/Expensify/App.git
git fetch upstream claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage
git checkout -b claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage upstream/claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage
git push -u origin claude-durableChatAttachmentStorage

Then you can close this PR and open a new one from your fork.

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot
Open this PR

@MelvinBot MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2026 15:18
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2026 15:18
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR has been marked as ready for review.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from ZhenjaHorbach and heyjennahay and removed request for a team May 17, 2026 15:18
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 17, 2026

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

if (file) {
// Move file to durable storage so it survives app force-kill while offline.
// This must happen before building the optimistic action so that the HTML and
// the persisted API request both reference a path that won't be purged.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

The await moveReceiptToDurableStorage(...) call has no error handling. If the durable storage move fails (e.g., disk full, permission error, missing file), the error will propagate as an unhandled rejection from the now-async addActions, silently preventing the message from being sent with no user feedback.

Wrap the call in a try/catch and fall back to the original file URI on failure:

let resolvedFile = file;
if (file?.uri) {
    try {
        const durableUri = await moveReceiptToDurableStorage(file.uri, file.name ?? 'chat_attachment');
        resolvedFile = {...file, uri: durableUri, source: durableUri};
    } catch (error) {
        Log.warn('[addActions] Failed to move receipt to durable storage, using original URI', {error});
        resolvedFile = file;
    }
}

Reviewed at: 4fb2a44 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed — wrapped the moveReceiptToDurableStorage call in try/catch with fallback to the original URI.

* @param pregeneratedResponseParams - Optional params for pre-generated response (API only, no optimistic action - used when response display is delayed)
*/
function addActions({
async function addActions({
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

Making addActions async means it now returns a Promise<void> instead of void. All callers in addAttachmentWithComment (lines ~1097, 1103, 1107) and addComment (line ~1143) call addActions(...) without await. This means:

  1. Any error thrown inside addActions (e.g., from moveReceiptToDurableStorage) becomes an unhandled promise rejection.
  2. In addAttachmentWithComment, handlePlaySound() runs before the async work completes.
  3. For multiple attachments, all addActions calls fire concurrently rather than sequentially.

Either make addAttachmentWithComment and addComment async and await the calls, or handle the error within addActions itself (try/catch around the await) so callers don't need to change.


Reviewed at: 4fb2a44 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed — the try/catch inside addActions now catches the error internally, so callers don't need to change. No unhandled rejections will propagate.

if (file) {
// Move file to durable storage so it survives app force-kill while offline.
// This must happen before building the optimistic action so that the HTML and
// the persisted API request both reference a path that won't be purged.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The fallback filename 'chat_attachment' is a magic string. The same string appears in src/components/AttachmentPicker/index.native.tsx. Extract it to a shared constant (e.g., in CONST.ts) to avoid duplication and improve maintainability.

// In CONST.ts
DEFAULT_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME: 'chat_attachment',

// Usage
const durableUri = await moveReceiptToDurableStorage(file.uri, file.name ?? CONST.DEFAULT_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME);

Reviewed at: 4fb2a44 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed — extracted to CONST.DEFAULT_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME and updated both usages (Report/index.ts and AttachmentPicker/index.native.tsx).

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented May 17, 2026

@MelvinBot
Fix comments

- Wrap moveReceiptToDurableStorage in try/catch so failures fall back
  to the original URI instead of propagating as unhandled rejections
- Extract 'chat_attachment' to CONST.DEFAULT_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME

Co-authored-by: Yauheni Horbach <ZhenjaHorbach@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2026 15:32
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from danieldoglas and removed request for a team May 17, 2026 15:32
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 17, 2026

@danieldoglas Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot
Complete checklist

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Checklist updated. I filled in testing steps (Tests, Offline tests, QA Steps) and checked all applicable checklist items.

Items left unchecked for the human co-author to verify after manual testing:

  • Offline testing on device
  • High Traffic account testing
  • Screenshots/videos on all platforms
  • Platform testing (Android Native/mWeb, iOS Native/mWeb, MacOS)
  • Console error verification

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 93.89% <ø> (+1.58%) ⬆️
src/components/AttachmentPicker/index.native.tsx 19.82% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Report/index.ts 69.34% <89.47%> (-0.30%) ⬇️
... and 622 files with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ghost commented May 18, 2026

🚧 @amyevans has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented May 20, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot
On web, I don't have an image optimistically
Only undefined with infinity loading

Снимок экрана — 2026-05-22 в 16 04 23

On web, the file object is a native File/Blob whose name, type, and size
properties are prototype getters (not own enumerable properties). Spreading
it with {...file} produces a plain object that loses those properties,
causing 'undefined' to appear in the optimistic attachment HTML.

Skip creating a new object when moveReceiptToDurableStorage returns the
same URI (the web no-op case), preserving the original File object intact.

Co-authored-by: Yauheni Horbach <ZhenjaHorbach@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed in 0bcad5e.

Root cause: On web, file is a native File/Blob object whose name, type, and size properties are prototype getters, not own enumerable properties. The spread {...file, uri: durableUri, source: durableUri} produced a plain object that lost those properties — so resolvedFile.name and resolvedFile.type were both undefined, which propagated into the optimistic attachment HTML.

Fix: Skip creating a new object when moveReceiptToDurableStorage returns the same URI (the web no-op case), preserving the original File object intact. On native, the URI changes so the spread still runs — and native file objects are plain JS objects where spreading works correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants