Skip to content

Fix fragment.text literal and close search RHP after deleting last message#92543

Open
WojtekBoman wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:fix/closing-rhp-after-deleting-thread
Open

Fix fragment.text literal and close search RHP after deleting last message#92543
WojtekBoman wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:fix/closing-rhp-after-deleting-thread

Conversation

@WojtekBoman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixes the "fragment.text" literal showing in chat after deleting a thread conversation: the default case in ReportActionItemFragment now renders {fragment?.text ?? ''} instead of the literal string. Additionally, in deleteReportComment, when a report shown in the search RHP (/search/view/:reportID) has no visible actions left after deletion, we pop that RHP screen (keeping any wider RHP below open).

Screen.Recording.2026-06-03.at.17.09.44.mov

Fixed Issues

$ #91603
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Go to a workspace chat and create two expenses.
  2. Go to Spend > Reports and open the report.
  3. Open any expense, then send a message in the transaction thread.
  4. Right click the message > Reply in thread, and send a reply in the thread.
  5. Delete the parent message (right click > Delete comment), then delete the thread reply (right click > Delete comment).
  6. Verify that "fragment.text" does NOT appear anywhere after deleting the thread conversation.
  7. Verify that once the last visible message in the report opened via /search/view/:reportID is deleted, that RHP screen closes automatically (instead of showing an empty report).
  8. With a wider RHP (e.g. expense details) stacked below the search report view, repeat step 7 and verify that only the top report screen is popped while the wider RHP underneath remains open.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Go offline.
  2. Open a report via Spend > Reports (/search/view/:reportID) and delete its last visible message.
  3. Verify that the RHP screen is popped and "fragment.text" never appears.
  4. Go back online and verify the deletion persists and the UI stays consistent.

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman requested review from a team as code owners June 3, 2026 15:10
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from flaviadefaria and hungvu193 and removed request for a team and flaviadefaria June 3, 2026 15:10
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

@hungvu193 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 3, 2026 15:10
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant