Skip to content

docs: add comprehensive keywords for discoverability #35#46

Merged
VikramAditya33 merged 1 commit into
FOSSFORGE:mainfrom
aryan55254:feature/comprehensive-keywords
Apr 27, 2026
Merged

docs: add comprehensive keywords for discoverability #35#46
VikramAditya33 merged 1 commit into
FOSSFORGE:mainfrom
aryan55254:feature/comprehensive-keywords

Conversation

@aryan55254
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR addresses issue #35 by expanding the keywords array in package.json. The added keywords are mapped directly to verified features found in the codebase (such as multipart handling, compression, and room management) to improve discovery for developers searching for high-performance NestJS adapters.

Changes

  • Updated package.json keywords to include: backpressure, low-latency, multipart, body-parser, compression, rooms, broadcasting, microservices, static-files, fast, and high-throughput.
  • Ran npm run format to ensure JSON consistency and project styling.

Verification Results

  • Linter: Passed locally with no errors or warnings.
  • Tests: All 927 tests passed in 2.879s.
  • Build: npm run build completed successfully using tsc.
  • Environment: Verified on Node.js v24.

Summary Checklist

  • I have read the relevant documentation at uwest.js.org/docs
  • The linter passes locally with no errors or warnings
  • I have written tests for my changes (N/A - Metadata update only)
  • All existing and new tests pass
  • My branch is rebased on the latest main
  • My commits are squashed into clean, logical units with descriptive messages

Closes #35

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b907df2b-4218-4510-8991-69625e1248e6

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@VikramAditya33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aryan55254 Thank you for this PR, overall LGTM just a few suggestions I have

  • Could you add a few keywords around express and fastify and also add a keyword for streaming too as we support writable stream.
  • Also can you request me a review on top right side so that I can properly approve the code review.

Thank you

@aryan55254 aryan55254 force-pushed the feature/comprehensive-keywords branch from 413128a to 39a98e0 Compare April 27, 2026 13:11
@aryan55254
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aryan55254 commented Apr 27, 2026

Hey @VikramAditya33, I've added the keywords for express, fastify, and streaming as suggested , I updated the original commit to keep the history clean instead of adding a new one.

Regarding the review request: I am unable to do so , for some reason the 'Reviewers' cog icon isn't appearing for me in this repo.

@VikramAditya33 VikramAditya33 self-requested a review April 27, 2026 13:21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@VikramAditya33 VikramAditya33 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thank you, no worries regarding the request thing it could a repo issue.

@VikramAditya33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll merge this branch whenever you wish to

@aryan55254
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks , You can merge it now , looking forward to contributing more here soon.

@VikramAditya33 VikramAditya33 merged commit f94a79b into FOSSFORGE:main Apr 27, 2026
3 checks passed
@VikramAditya33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aryan55254 There's another issue opened that you can probably work on Consider using a static frozen empty object constant instead of hardcoding #34

The current PR that is linked to this issue looks slop to me so if you want to contribute you can look forward to this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add more comprehensive keywords

2 participants