Updating the docs workflow.

[EshwarCVS]

Quick bug fix

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

Ubuntu runner, Python 3.13. HTTP table uses the same httpx load against uvicorn (Python) and Fiber (Go). Direct ASGI (below) is Python-only and excludes network I/O.

HTTP throughput (FasterAPI vs FastAPI vs Fiber)

Endpoint	FasterAPI	FastAPI	Fiber (Go)	F / Fast
GET /health	495/s	519/s	506/s	0.95x
GET /users/{id}	551/s	551/s	551/s	1.00x
POST /users	478/s	480/s	456/s	1.00x

Direct ASGI (no HTTP; 50,000 iterations)

Endpoint	FasterAPI	FastAPI	Speedup	vs README ASGI ratio
GET /health	213,546/s	19,661/s	10.86x	+58.6%
GET /users/{id}	184,160/s	13,958/s	13.19x	+51.1%
POST /users	111,294/s	11,144/s	9.99x	+39.7%

Routing (radix vs regex, 1,500,000 lookups)

Router	Ops/s	Speedup	vs README
Radix	950,961	9.4x	+23.3%
Regex	101,459	1.0x

How to read this

• F / Fast = FasterAPI req/s ÷ FastAPI req/s on the same HTTP harness (higher is better).
• Fiber uses the Go app in benchmarks/fiber (same routes). Go is often several times faster than Python here; the important guard for regressions is check_regressions.py (ASGI + routing floors), which must pass in this workflow.
• vs README compares combined speedups to documented reference numbers (local machine); CI absolute req/s differs by hardware.