Skip to content

Conversation

@pjfanning
Copy link
Member

@pjfanning pjfanning commented Oct 10, 2018

ChampHashMap and ChampHashSet are not renamed HashMap and HashSet
https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/champhashmap-champhashset-changes-in-2-13-0-m5/2445

#391

type ChampHashMap[A, B] = immutable.ChampHashMap[A, B]
type ChampHashSet[A] = immutable.ChampHashSet[A]
type ChampHashMap[A, B] = immutable.HashMap[A, B]
type ChampHashSet[A] = immutable.HashSet[A]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since these were "added" only because of the scala 2.13 branch, let's remove them from all package.scala (including 2.12, etc) files and drop any tests that reference them. You can probably do a find-all of Champ and drop all blocks/tests with lines referencing it. Thanks!

@pjfanning
Copy link
Member Author

@nbauernfeind removed all references to the Champ classes

@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind merged commit ec86520 into FasterXML:master Oct 10, 2018
@nbauernfeind
Copy link
Member

Thanks! I will set aside some time in my early tomorrow to release this.

@pjfanning pjfanning deleted the scala-2.13.0-M5 branch October 10, 2018 21:36
@seratch
Copy link
Contributor

seratch commented Oct 14, 2018

@nbauernfeind Thank you for working on this! Are you going to release jars very soon?

seratch added a commit to seratch/skinny-micro that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2018
still waiting for jackson-scala-module release
FasterXML/jackson-module-scala#392
seratch added a commit to seratch/skinny-micro that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2018
still waiting for jackson-scala-module release
FasterXML/jackson-module-scala#392
seratch added a commit to seratch/skinny-micro that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2018
still waiting for jackson-scala-module release
FasterXML/jackson-module-scala#392
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants