Skip to content

Conversation

@TabishB
Copy link
Contributor

@TabishB TabishB commented Oct 5, 2025

Summary

  • add a current spec reference section to the Codex slash command proposal
  • confirm both cli-init and cli-update deltas copy full requirement blocks so archiving preserves prior scenarios

Testing

  • node bin/openspec.js validate add-codex-slash-command-support --strict

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68e19760e87083229af7816f3165537f

TabishB and others added 5 commits October 9, 2025 00:56
Add support for generating and updating Codex prompts in `.codex/prompts/` directory:
- Implement CodexSlashCommandConfigurator for managing openspec-*.md prompts
- Update AI_TOOLS configuration to include Codex as an available option
- Add Codex registration in SlashCommandRegistry
- Update documentation to reflect Codex support
- Add comprehensive test coverage for Codex init and update workflows
Add comprehensive Codex slash command support with Claude.md integration,
config-driven command management, and full test coverage. Update documentation
and changelog to reflect changes.
All tasks for the Codex slash command support feature have been implemented and tested.
Remove the Codex-specific installation note as it's no longer needed in the main setup instructions. This information is better suited for tool-specific documentation.
@TabishB TabishB changed the title Document existing CLI specs in Codex proposal feat: Add codex custom slash command support Oct 8, 2025
@TabishB TabishB merged commit 9ae6141 into main Oct 8, 2025
6 checks passed
drvova pushed a commit to drvova/VovaSpec that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
* Document current cli specs and archive safety

* feat: add Codex slash command support

Add support for generating and updating Codex prompts in `.codex/prompts/` directory:
- Implement CodexSlashCommandConfigurator for managing openspec-*.md prompts
- Update AI_TOOLS configuration to include Codex as an available option
- Add Codex registration in SlashCommandRegistry
- Update documentation to reflect Codex support
- Add comprehensive test coverage for Codex init and update workflows

* feat: complete Codex slash command support implementation

Add comprehensive Codex slash command support with Claude.md integration,
config-driven command management, and full test coverage. Update documentation
and changelog to reflect changes.

* chore: mark all Codex slash command tasks as completed

All tasks for the Codex slash command support feature have been implemented and tested.

* docs: remove Codex-specific note from README

Remove the Codex-specific installation note as it's no longer needed in the main setup instructions. This information is better suited for tool-specific documentation.
Kh05ifr4nD pushed a commit to Kh05ifr4nD/sorapec that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
* Document current cli specs and archive safety

* feat: add Codex slash command support

Add support for generating and updating Codex prompts in `.codex/prompts/` directory:
- Implement CodexSlashCommandConfigurator for managing openspec-*.md prompts
- Update AI_TOOLS configuration to include Codex as an available option
- Add Codex registration in SlashCommandRegistry
- Update documentation to reflect Codex support
- Add comprehensive test coverage for Codex init and update workflows

* feat: complete Codex slash command support implementation

Add comprehensive Codex slash command support with Claude.md integration,
config-driven command management, and full test coverage. Update documentation
and changelog to reflect changes.

* chore: mark all Codex slash command tasks as completed

All tasks for the Codex slash command support feature have been implemented and tested.

* docs: remove Codex-specific note from README

Remove the Codex-specific installation note as it's no longer needed in the main setup instructions. This information is better suited for tool-specific documentation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants