Convincing or not

[slackguru]

Please forgive me but I haven't found one physicist that has convinced me they know one single thing for sure about our shared experience. There are no laws. And what man calls science is all false. According to your theory you will never find answers because "patches" previously experienced can not be recovered or recorded without access to the "observer" who has long since passed. This theory of yours requires cooperation that is not available. Why do physicists waste such time and money just to attempt to prove we "have no creator" which is a lie? If you're a physicist, you're no different than the others. Unconvincing.

[muellerberndt]

And what man calls science is all false. According to your theory you will never find answers because "patches" previously experienced can not be recovered or recorded without access to the "observer" who has long since passed.

That's not correct! Information cannot be destroyed or lost, and according to OPH, "log since passed" is not a thing. In fact, your consciousness can and will be recovered. Check the book epilogue:

https://oph-book.floatingpragma.io/chapter/epilogue

Why do physicists waste such time and money just to attempt to prove we "have no creator" which is a lie?

OPH shows that we do have a creator (or creators).