Skip to content

Conversation

@tomholub
Copy link
Collaborator

@tomholub tomholub commented Dec 4, 2020

close #3108

@tomholub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tomholub commented Dec 7, 2020

@danishnavid008 please merge changes from master to here, and help me finish this PR. Thanks!

@danishnavid008 danishnavid008 marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2020 06:56
@danishnavid008
Copy link
Contributor

@tomholub This PR is ready for review

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tomholub tomholub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see one error - please have a look. Have you evaluated all usages of getFirstRequired vs getFirstOptional? Are there no situations when you're unsure and would want to double check with me?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tomholub tomholub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good now - there is one remaining line that maybe was added by mistake.

Maybe earlier I was reviewing an older version - not sure. Thanks!

@tomholub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

All good, thank you

@tomholub tomholub merged commit 903afdf into master Dec 11, 2020
@tomholub tomholub deleted the issue-3108-improve-key-store branch December 11, 2020 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

split getFirst into two methods: getFirstOptional and getFirstRequired

3 participants