Update conformance vectors

[tomusdrw]

• update ignore list
• update vectors ref

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated test reference configuration value.
  • Added three additional test cases to the conformance test ignore list.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the test vector reference commit hash in the build script from one value to another, and adds three additional test vector paths to the conformance test ignore list. The changes are configuration and reference management updates with no modifications to control flow or logic.

Estimated Code Review Effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

These are straightforward reference updates: a single hash replacement and three new entries added to an ignore list. The changes follow established patterns with no logic modifications, making this a quick verification task.

Possibly Related PRs

• Update test vectors #784: Updates both .github/scripts/load-test-ref.sh and bin/test-runner/jam-conformance-071.ts in the same manner
• Removed from ignored - retired test-vector & update ref test-vectors #793: Modifies the same files with overlapping test vector ignore list adjustments
• Update test vectors ref to 849e0b15a2152bb41efe272a14e24093bc885e9b #795: Updates the same REF/TEST_VECTORS_REF variable from a preceding commit hash

Suggested Reviewers

• skoszuta
• mateuszsikora

Poem

🐰 A hop, skip, and hash update here,
New vectors to test, the path crystal clear!
Three ignores are added with automated cheer,
Reference refreshed—conformance draws near! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Update conformance vectors' directly relates to the changeset, which updates test vector references and the ignore list for conformance testing.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately outlines the two main changes: updating the ignore list and updating the vectors reference, both of which are present in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch td-conformance

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 945762b and 503ee37.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/scripts/load-test-ref.sh (1 hunks)
• bin/test-runner/jam-conformance-071.ts (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/*.ts

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*.ts: rules from ./CODESTYLE.md should be adhered to.

**/*.ts: Any function whose documentation mention it must not be used in production code,
can be safely used in *.test.ts files. Other usage should be carefuly reviewed
and the comment must explain why it's safe to use there.

**/*.ts: as conversions must not be used. Suggest using tryAs conversion methods.

**/*.ts: Classes with static Codec field must have private constructor and static create method.

**/*.ts: Casting a bigint (or U64) using Number(x) must have an explanation comment why
it is safe.

**/*.ts: When making changes to code with comments containing links (in classes, constants, methods, etc.)
to graypaper.fluffylabs.dev, ensure those links point to the current version for this update.

Files:

• bin/test-runner/jam-conformance-071.ts

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 120000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: e2e (22.x)
• GitHub Check: run (22.x)
• GitHub Check: run (22.x)
• GitHub Check: benchmarks (22.x)
• GitHub Check: run (22.x)
• GitHub Check: test (22.x)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

bin/test-runner/jam-conformance-071.ts (2)

13-13: LGTM! Additional test case ignored for valid edge case behavior.

This test is appropriately grouped under the "no timeslot in pre-state - valid behavior" category, consistent with the existing pattern.

---

19-20: LGTM! Additional test cases ignored for valid edge case behavior.

These tests are appropriately grouped under the "Invalid ticket attempt - valid behavior" category, consistent with the existing pattern.

[github-actions]

View all

File	Benchmark	Ops
bytes/hex-from.ts[0]	parse hex using Number with NaN checking	122163.22 ±0.48%	85.4% slower
bytes/hex-from.ts[1]	parse hex from char codes	836925.2 ±0.49%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-from.ts[2]	parse hex from string nibbles	513615.7 ±1.18%	38.63% slower
hash/index.ts[0]	hash with numeric representation	183.1 ±0.79%	29.15% slower
hash/index.ts[1]	hash with string representation	115.42 ±0.87%	55.34% slower
hash/index.ts[2]	hash with symbol representation	179.37 ±1.1%	30.6% slower
hash/index.ts[3]	hash with uint8 representation	161.78 ±0.22%	37.4% slower
hash/index.ts[4]	hash with packed representation	258.45 ±0.46%	fastest ✅
hash/index.ts[5]	hash with bigint representation	191.57 ±0.17%	25.88% slower
hash/index.ts[6]	hash with uint32 representation	199.58 ±0.37%	22.78% slower
logger/index.ts[0]	console.log with string concat	8028369.29 ±36.92%	fastest ✅
logger/index.ts[1]	console.log with args	49803.43 ±49.27%	99.38% slower
math/add_one_overflow.ts[0]	add and take modulus	267344285.12 ±3.97%	fastest ✅
math/add_one_overflow.ts[1]	condition before calculation	239551018.16 ±7.71%	10.4% slower
bytes/hex-to.ts[0]	number toString + padding	207389.04 ±0.79%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-to.ts[1]	manual	12049.44 ±0.56%	94.19% slower
codec/encoding.ts[0]	manual encode	2186401.49 ±0.3%	22.72% slower
codec/encoding.ts[1]	int32array encode	2829138.54 ±1.11%	fastest ✅
codec/encoding.ts[2]	dataview encode	2800967.9 ±0.53%	1% slower
codec/bigint.compare.ts[0]	compare custom	263570709.64 ±5.48%	2.25% slower
codec/bigint.compare.ts[1]	compare bigint	269639961.87 ±5.11%	fastest ✅
codec/bigint.decode.ts[0]	decode custom	172898581.73 ±2.8%	fastest ✅
codec/bigint.decode.ts[1]	decode bigint	79588054.98 ±3.28%	53.97% slower
codec/decoding.ts[0]	manual decode	16905028.85 ±0.45%	89.76% slower
codec/decoding.ts[1]	int32array decode	165098741.45 ±3.26%	fastest ✅
codec/decoding.ts[2]	dataview decode	164728660.69 ±3.27%	0.22% slower
collections/map-set.ts[0]	2 gets + conditional set	119244.47 ±0.13%	fastest ✅
collections/map-set.ts[1]	1 get 1 set	61783.71 ±0.01%	48.19% slower
math/count-bits-u64.ts[0]	standard method	5107556.76 ±0.24%	89.6% slower
math/count-bits-u64.ts[1]	magic	49126694.17 ±60.54%	fastest ✅
math/mul_overflow.ts[0]	multiply and bring back to u32	259086937.17 ±6.89%	4.31% slower
math/mul_overflow.ts[1]	multiply and take modulus	270763565.69 ±5.43%	fastest ✅
math/switch.ts[0]	switch	266829789.68 ±5.86%	fastest ✅
math/switch.ts[1]	if	265461754.62 ±4.74%	0.51% slower
math/count-bits-u32.ts[0]	standard method	104050907.52 ±2.02%	58.92% slower
math/count-bits-u32.ts[1]	magic	253296225.58 ±4.85%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_object.ts[0]	Get the first field from Decoded	514165.34 ±0.43%	0.2% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[1]	Get the first field from View	103776.66 ±0.13%	79.86% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[2]	Get the first field as view from View	103726.62 ±0.09%	79.87% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[3]	Get two fields from Decoded	513562.75 ±0.27%	0.32% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[4]	Get two fields from View	82786.58 ±0.14%	83.93% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[5]	Get two fields from materialized from View	173846.55 ±0.23%	66.26% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[6]	Get two fields as views from View	82461.62 ±0.15%	83.99% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[7]	Get only third field from Decoded	515200.06 ±0.3%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_object.ts[8]	Get only third field from View	102699.84 ±0.17%	80.07% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[9]	Get only third field as view from View	102406.79 ±0.16%	80.12% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[0]	Get first element from Decoded	30741.02 ±0.24%	55.48% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[1]	Get first element from View	69046.64 ±0.15%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[2]	Get 50th element from Decoded	31833.51 ±0.26%	53.9% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[3]	Get 50th element from View	35731.9 ±0.23%	48.25% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[4]	Get last element from Decoded	31846.16 ±0.17%	53.88% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[5]	Get last element from View	24441.8 ±0.22%	64.6% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	559.66 ±112.52%	28.28% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	687.94 ±152.09%	11.84% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	336.66 ±111.5%	56.86% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	639.01 ±165.3%	18.11% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	448.58 ±122.81%	42.52% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	780.36 ±145.65%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	3661.64 ±0.23%	0.09% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	3665.1 ±0.23%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	3662.3 ±0.31%	0.08% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	3649.45 ±0.26%	0.43% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	3655.64 ±0.26%	0.26% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	988.99 ±116.67%	73.02% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	362.26 ±93.52%	26.39% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	462.26 ±114.13%	6.07% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	479.44 ±109.67%	2.58% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	479.2 ±108.45%	2.63% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	492.15 ±111.7%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	139.01 ±102.18%	71.75% slower
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[0]	Conversion with bitops	6268.76 ±11.82%	29.67% slower
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[1]	Conversion without bitops	8913.72 ±5.9%	fastest ✅
bytes/compare.ts[0]	Comparing Uint32 bytes	21304.57 ±0.12%	2.99% slower
bytes/compare.ts[1]	Comparing raw bytes	21960.19 ±0.33%	fastest ✅
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[0]	Map	327457.69 ±0.2%	fastest ✅
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[1]	Map-array	103656.21 ±0.03%	68.35% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[2]	Array	88995.01 ±0.28%	72.82% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[3]	SortedArray	200899.98 ±0.34%	38.65% slower
hash/blake2b.ts[0]	our hasher	2.23 ±0.19%	fastest ✅
hash/blake2b.ts[1]	blake2b js	0.05 ±0.41%	97.76% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[0]	native crypto	5.48 ±17.95%	82.09% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[1]	wasm lib	10.88 ±0.03%	64.44% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[2]	wasm lib batch	30.6 ±0.51%	fastest ✅

Benchmarks summary: 83/83 OK ✅