Skip to content

Conversation

@VincentMolinie
Copy link
Member

Definition of Done

General

  • Write an explicit title for the Pull Request, following Conventional Commits specification
  • Test manually the implemented changes
  • Validate the code quality (indentation, syntax, style, simplicity, readability)

Security

  • Consider the security impact of the changes made

@VincentMolinie
Copy link
Member Author

VincentMolinie commented Dec 3, 2025

CU-86c6ur5mf
CU-86c6ur5pr

@qltysh
Copy link

qltysh bot commented Dec 3, 2025

2 new issues

Tool Category Rule Count
qlty Structure Function with high complexity (count = 11): run 1
qlty Structure Function with many parameters (count = 4): createActivityLog 1

This is from Qlty Cloud, the successor to Code Climate Quality. Learn more.

@VincentMolinie VincentMolinie changed the base branch from main to feat/forest-mcp/main December 3, 2025 15:13
@VincentMolinie VincentMolinie force-pushed the feat/forest-mcp/list-tools branch from 27e6e21 to e619bd3 Compare December 5, 2025 09:55
@qltysh
Copy link

qltysh bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Coverage Impact

This PR will not change total coverage.

🚦 See full report on Qlty Cloud »

🛟 Help
  • Diff Coverage: Coverage for added or modified lines of code (excludes deleted files). Learn more.

  • Total Coverage: Coverage for the whole repository, calculated as the sum of all File Coverage. Learn more.

  • File Coverage: Covered Lines divided by Covered Lines plus Missed Lines. (Excludes non-executable lines including blank lines and comments.)

    • Indirect Changes: Changes to File Coverage for files that were not modified in this PR. Learn more.

This is from Qlty Cloud, the successor to Code Climate Quality. Learn more.

@VincentMolinie VincentMolinie force-pushed the feat/forest-mcp/list-tools branch from 7ee39ae to d1358fd Compare December 8, 2025 15:58
Comment on lines 53 to 54
title: 'List data from the customer agent',
description: 'Retrieve a list of data from the specified collection in the customer agent.',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should keep the "records" wording, to be consistent with forest docs

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also i'm not sure if we should refer to "customer agent", because from the AI's perpective, there is only one agent.

"Retrieve a list of records from the specified collection." should be enough

@VincentMolinie VincentMolinie merged commit 2dd7e9b into feat/forest-mcp/main Dec 9, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@VincentMolinie VincentMolinie deleted the feat/forest-mcp/list-tools branch December 9, 2025 11:21
Scra3 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants