docs: rebrand UIForge → Forge Space across all documentation

[LucasSantana-Dev]

Summary

Systematic rebrand of stale UIForge references to Forge Space across 12 documentation files.

Files Updated

File	Changes
docs/guides/DEVELOPER_ONBOARDING.md	Header, intro, all references
docs/standards/DEVELOPMENT.md	Header, overview, all references
docs/ecosystem/INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md	Header, overview, all references
docs/ecosystem/ARCHITECTURE.md	Header, all references
docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-001-006	All 6 ADR files updated
docs/operations/MAINTENANCE_AUTOMATION.md	All references
docs/operations/RELEASE_AUTOMATION.md	All references

Replacements Applied

UIForge Patterns  →  Forge Space Core
UIForge ecosystem →  Forge Space ecosystem
UIForge Ecosystem →  Forge Space Ecosystem  
UIForge           →  Forge Space
uiforge-mcp       →  ui-mcp
uiforge-webapp    →  siza

Validation

• ✅ Build passes
• ✅ 599 tests pass
• ✅ Prettier formatting applied
• ✅ validate gate passes

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@LucasSantana-Dev has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 86c76e5e-07a0-4c97-9864-661d0152115e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc7549e and 66d4fd4.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)

• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-001-ecosystem-design.md
• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-002-gateway-central-hub.md
• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-003-mcp-server-design.md
• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-004-webapp-architecture.md
• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-005-integration-patterns.md
• docs/architecture-decisions/ADR-006-centralized-feature-toggles.md
• docs/ecosystem/ARCHITECTURE.md
• docs/ecosystem/INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md
• docs/guides/DEVELOPER_ONBOARDING.md
• docs/operations/MAINTENANCE_AUTOMATION.md
• docs/operations/RELEASE_AUTOMATION.md
• docs/standards/DEVELOPMENT.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/rebrand-stale-docs

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Project Scorecard

Scorecard: 84/100 (B)
────────────────────────────────────────
  security: 100/100 (A)
  quality: 80/100 (B) — 1 violations
  performance: 67/100 (D) — 1 violations
  compliance: 75/100 (C) — 1 violations
  dependency: 100/100 (A)

Recommendations:
  - Increase test coverage to meet the 80% threshold
  - Extend log retention to at least 90 days for compliance

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud