fix(core): undo prior manual event detection#2287
Merged
Merged
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 9b4be79 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
kitten
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2022
Merged
This was referenced Feb 18, 2022
This was
linked to
issues
Feb 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
In #2210 I've done an attempt at catching errors that happen in the backwards chain of the exchange-stream. This because we have this part of the stream forked since #1854 to support incremental fetch-results.
The downside of this is that the
executeIncrementalFetchis wrapped by a.catchitself to account for erroneous results from the server. In this attempt we tried to catch bothTypeErroras well asSyntaxErroras those are the most common ones. However,failed to fetchis an example of aTypeErrorthat actually comes from thefetchcall which we want to report to the client.I'm not entirely sure how we can prevent swallowing errors, one potential avenue would be to wrap user-supplied functions and mark them as errored out in the exchanges but this is a big caveat to have towards external exchange-authors. Trying to think of a way we could make the response-stream report errors during dev, maybe even just a console.error? However that could prove problematic for production systems that want to report this...
EDIT: I've added one possible solution that moves the closure of
executeIncrementalFetchwithin thefetchSourcethis way we can effectively track whether we are on the last result, the only case I'm in doubt about would befailed to fetchSet of changes