Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 11 minutes and 14 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughNuGet package metadata was updated across five project files with new descriptions, tags, and repository information. The README was expanded with a new section containing package badges, links, and installation instructions. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~18 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
50-52: Remove duplicate horizontal rule.There are two consecutive section separators; keeping one is cleaner.
Proposed cleanup
---- - ---🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` around lines 50 - 52, Remove the duplicate horizontal rule in the README by deleting one of the consecutive '---' separators between sections so only a single section separator remains; locate the back-to-back '---' lines and remove the extra line to keep a single horizontal rule.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 34: The link text "Package metadata (NuGet)" in README.md mismatches the
URL which points to the NuGet README tab; update the label to match the target
(e.g., change the link text to "Package README (NuGet)" or similar) so the
visible text aligns with the actual URL, locating and editing the Markdown line
that contains the "Package metadata (NuGet)" link.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 50-52: Remove the duplicate horizontal rule in the README by
deleting one of the consecutive '---' separators between sections so only a
single section separator remains; locate the back-to-back '---' lines and remove
the extra line to keep a single horizontal rule.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0650f90f-a1ce-42a8-b983-34646440b750
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
FluentAAS/FluentAAS.Builder/FluentAAS.Builder.csprojFluentAAS/FluentAAS.Core/FluentAAS.Core.csprojFluentAAS/FluentAAS.IO/FluentAAS.IO.csprojFluentAAS/FluentAAS.Templates/FluentAAS.Templates.csprojFluentAAS/FluentAAS.Validation/FluentAAS.Validation.csprojREADME.md
Motivation
READMEso consumers can find the NuGet packages easily.Description
FluentAAS.Builder,FluentAAS.Core,FluentAAS.IO,FluentAAS.Templates, andFluentAAS.Validation.csprojfiles by addingSummary, expandingPackageTags, settingPackageProjectUrlto the NuGet package page, and fixing theRepositoryUrltypo.RepositoryTypeandRepositoryCommit($(SourceRevisionId)) properties and ensuredPackageLicenseExpressionis present in each project file.Descriptiontext to be more specific for each project and standardized tags to includeIDTAanddotnetwhere appropriate.README.mdwith a "Published NuGet Package" section, badges, install instructions (dotnet add package FluentAAS.Builder), and links to NuGet and docs.Testing
dotnet restorefor the solution which completed successfully.dotnet buildfor the solution which completed successfully.dotnet packagainst the modified projects to inspect generated package metadata and confirmed the new fields are included in the package manifests.Codex Task
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation