Skip to content

Conversation

@dbu
Copy link
Contributor

@dbu dbu commented Jun 16, 2014

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this ok?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. If we go private, let's go private all the way. :)

@dbu
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbu commented Jun 16, 2014

AbstractProxyClient also has protected function queueRequest($method, $url, array $headers = array()) which is a bit awkward as it can't be used to queue an arbitrary request. but it needs to be protected, as is createRequest as that needs to be customized by the concrete implementations

@dbu
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbu commented Jun 16, 2014

btw, tests on FOSHttpCacheBundle success with this branch. Lets see for the lib itself with travis.

@ddeboer
Copy link
Member

ddeboer commented Jun 16, 2014

I guess the protected queueRequest() is okay for now. Let's merge this.

dbu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2014
@dbu dbu merged commit d901fa8 into master Jun 16, 2014
@dbu dbu deleted the protected-private branch June 16, 2014 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants