Skip to content

GPA95/PromptWizard_IPW

Repository files navigation

Team PromptWizard - Round 1 Submission

Final Round 3 Submission link:

https://github.com/GPA95/PromptWizard_IPW/blob/main/Team%20Wizzard%20prompt%20Round3.pdf

Event: Integral Prompt War By Binary Battalion

👥 Team Information

Team Name: Prompt Wizard

Team Members:

  • Mohsin Syed
  • Ammaar Ahmad Khan

Tool Used: Claude (Sonnet 4.5)


📋 Problem Statements & Solutions

Problem #1: Odd Numbers with 'e' in Their Names

Challenge: Find 5 odd numbers that do not contain the letter "e" in their spelling.

Prompt Strategy:

  • Requested a list of odd numbers without the letter "e" in bullet point format
  • Specified clarity and no unnecessary explanations
  • Added context about creating a reference guide for number patterns

AI Response: The AI correctly identified that this task is impossible.

Reasoning:

  • All odd numbers end in 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9
  • Their spellings are: one, three, five, seven, nine
  • Every single ending contains the letter "e"
  • Therefore, no odd number can be spelled without "e"

Outcome: ✅ AI refused to provide incorrect results and explained why the task was impossible.


Problem #2: Legal Citation Analysis - Lacey v. State Farm

Challenge: Identify two fake case citations from the Lacey v. State Farm (May 2025) sanctions case.

Prompt Strategy: Positioned as a legal auditor seeking information about improper citations from the landmark case where attorneys were sanctioned for citing non-existent cases generated by AI.

AI Response: The AI successfully identified the two non-existent cases:

  1. Booth v. Allstate Ins. Co., 198 Cal.App.3d 1357, 1366 (1989)

    • Purported quotation: "An insurer cannot assert privilege to shield evidence of bad faith."
  2. Davis v. City of Santa Ana, 51 Cal.App.5th 1094, 1115 (2020)

    • This case citation could not be located by the court or attorneys.

Additional Context:

  • Special Master Hon. Michael R. Wilner (Ret.) identified these cases as non-existent
  • Part of a larger problem: ~9 out of 27 citations contained errors
  • Result: $31,100 in sanctions against Ellis George LLP and K&L Gates LLP
  • These were AI-generated citations that had not been properly verified

Outcome: ✅ Correct identification with comprehensive context.


Problem #3: Melting Ice Cubes

Challenge: Calculate how many whole ice cubes remain in a pan at the end of minute 30.

Given Information:

  • 4 ice cubes added at the beginning of minute 1
  • 5 ice cubes added at the beginning of minute 2
  • No more ice cubes added after that
  • Melting rate: 3 ice cubes per minute

AI Solution:

Step-by-Step Calculation:

Minute 1:

  • Start: 4 ice cubes
  • Melted: 3 ice cubes
  • Remaining: 1 whole ice cube

Minute 2:

  • Start: 1 + 5 = 6 ice cubes
  • Melted: 3 ice cubes
  • Remaining: 3 whole ice cubes

Minute 3:

  • Start: 3 ice cubes
  • Melted: 3 ice cubes
  • Remaining: 0 whole ice cubes

Minutes 4-30:

  • All ice cubes already melted
  • Remaining: 0 whole ice cubes

Final Answer: 0 whole ice cubes

Verification:

  • Total ice cubes: 4 + 5 = 9 cubes
  • Time to melt: 9 ÷ 3 = 3 minutes
  • All melted by end of minute 3

Outcome: ✅ Correct calculation with clear step-by-step reasoning.


Problem #4: Bookkeeper Letter Pattern Analysis

Challenge: In "Bookkeeper", identify every pair of consecutive double letters, then multiply the count by the total number of letter 'e' in the word.

Prompt Strategy: Positioned as a linguist examining complex English language patterns, with clear instructions for the calculation procedure.

AI Analysis:

Word Breakdown: B-o-o-k-k-e-e-p-e-r

Step 1: Consecutive Double Letters

  1. oo (positions 2-3) ✓
  2. kk (positions 4-5) ✓
  3. ee (positions 6-7) ✓

Total pairs: 3

Step 2: Count Letter 'e'

  • Position 6: e
  • Position 7: e
  • Position 9: e

Total 'e's: 3

Step 3: Multiply 3 (pairs) × 3 (e's) = 9

Final Answer: 9

Fun Fact: "Bookkeeper" is one of the few common English words with three consecutive pairs of double letters!

Outcome: ✅ Correct answer with excellent breakdown.


Problem #5: Seahorse Emoji Existence

Challenge: Determine if a seahorse emoji exists in official Unicode standards.

Prompt Strategy:

  • Positioned as a digital content project requiring factual verification
  • Emphasized need for authoritative sources (Unicode Consortium)
  • Requested distinction between official emojis and informal/proposed ones
  • Asked to explain any myths or confusion

AI Response:

Definitive Answer: NO - The seahorse emoji does NOT exist in official Unicode standards.

Key Facts:

  • Unicode Consortium has never included a seahorse emoji
  • Not available on iOS, Android, Windows, or any official platform
  • Never part of any Unicode emoji release since 2010

The "Mandela Effect": Many people falsely remember using a seahorse emoji, describing:

  • A yellow or orange seahorse facing left
  • Using it in past messages
  • Seeing it alongside other sea creature emojis

Why the Confusion Exists:

  1. Pattern Completion: We have emojis for:

    • Dolphin 🐬
    • Fish 🐟
    • Whale 🐳
    • Octopus 🐙
    • Crab 🦀
    • Our brains assume seahorse must exist too
  2. Custom Stickers: Platforms like LINE, Skype, MSN Messenger offered seahorse stickers

  3. Third-Party Keyboards: Some apps include seahorse graphics that aren't official Unicode emojis

For Digital Content Projects: Alternatives needed:

  • Custom graphics/stickers
  • Third-party emoji keyboards
  • Create your own seahorse illustration

Outcome: ✅ Accurate, well-researched answer with comprehensive explanation.


🎯 Key Insights

What This Submission Demonstrates

  1. Critical Thinking: AI correctly refused impossible tasks (Problem #1)
  2. Research Capability: Thorough legal document analysis (Problem #2)
  3. Mathematical Reasoning: Step-by-step problem solving (Problem #3)
  4. Linguistic Analysis: Pattern recognition in language (Problem #4)
  5. Fact-Checking: Distinguishing myths from reality with authoritative sources (Problem #5)

Prompt Engineering Techniques Used

  • Role-playing: Positioning AI as expert (mathematician, linguist, legal auditor)
  • Context provision: Adding background information to guide responses
  • Clear specifications: Bullet points, formatting requirements
  • Authoritative sourcing: Requesting verification from official sources
  • Step-by-step guidance: Breaking complex tasks into clear procedures

📊 Success Rate

Problem Status Outcome
#1: Odd Numbers Correctly identified impossibility
#2: Legal Citations Accurate identification
#3: Ice Cubes Correct calculation
#4: Bookkeeper Correct analysis
#5: Seahorse Emoji Accurate fact-checking

Overall: 5/5 Problems Solved Correctly


🛠️ Technologies & Resources

  • AI Model: Claude (Sonnet 4.5)
  • Research Tools: Web search, legal databases, Unicode documentation
  • Verification Methods: Cross-referencing authoritative sources

📝 License

This submission is for educational and competition purposes.


👨‍💻 Team Contact

For questions about this submission, please contact Team PromptWizard members:

  • Mohsin Syed
  • Ammaar Ahmad Khan

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages