When a participant who was consented as a dependent (by a
parent/guardian) reaches the age of legal consent, the consent
should transition to an adult consent — re-affirmed by the now-adult
participant rather than implicitly inherited.
Design questions before implementation
- Trigger: age-based automatic, study-team initiated, or participant
initiated?
- What happens between "trigger fired" and "adult consent affirmed"
— is data access paused, continues under old consent, or other?
- Communication flow with the now-adult participant (and the prior
guardian)
- Edge cases: participant unreachable, declines to re-consent,
declines but doesn't actively withdraw
- Audit: how is the lineage from dependent → adult consent recorded?
Context
Raised during a CTRL demo on 22 June 2026 with a prospective external
collaborator (paediatric oncofertility research group).
When a participant who was consented as a dependent (by a
parent/guardian) reaches the age of legal consent, the consent
should transition to an adult consent — re-affirmed by the now-adult
participant rather than implicitly inherited.
Design questions before implementation
initiated?
— is data access paused, continues under old consent, or other?
guardian)
declines but doesn't actively withdraw
Context
Raised during a CTRL demo on 22 June 2026 with a prospective external
collaborator (paediatric oncofertility research group).