Extensions and the future of the Standard

[justinschembri]

Throughout this testbed we've had at least one server with several extensions which are all very useful - even if I've not had time to use them myself personally!

From my end I would like to build up on some of the FROST server's extended capabilities, especially around user management and authentication. I also realize that by making this choice I'm binding my system to Fraunhofer's implementation and making things slightly less interoperable.

@hylkevds - could you shed any light on the future of some of the extensions becoming "official", or is it safe to say these will always remain optional and developers building on them should be aware? @Kattouw - since yours is the first non-FROST (I think?) implementation out there, do you see a future where you've got your own extensions being rolled out?

[hylkevds]

I would love to have the OpenCitySense and Projects data models standardised. For that it would be good if we have some other people besides me in the SWG that actually use these models.

STA-SWG Telco is every Thursday at 17:00, TU Delft is member, so you should also be able to join :)
Today is the last one before the holidays, we re-start in September.