Skip to content

Conversation

@rromanchuk
Copy link
Contributor

#74

Copy link
Contributor

@ruggi ruggi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution @rromanchuk 😄
The changes in the README file are at lines 337 and 347:356 not relevant anymore because of #77 , but the change at line 421 is correct indeed. If you could adjust the PR to only fix that part I will go ahead and merge this. Thanks!

@teenkung
Copy link

347:356

@rromanchuk rromanchuk closed this May 15, 2018
@rromanchuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

#82

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants