Add smoketest environment #92
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kevinbackhouse
requested review from
JarLob,
Kwstubbs,
p- and
sylwia-budzynska
as code owners
Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of
kevinbackhouse
November 24, 2025 15:06
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds an environment specification to the smoketest workflow to prevent it from being incorrectly displayed as a "production" deployment on the repository's main page.
- Adds
environment: smoketestto the Linux job in the smoketest workflow
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Kwstubbs
approved these changes
Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The smoke test is currently getting listed as a deployment to "production", which looks confusing on the main page of the repo:
I think adding an environment to the workflow should fix it.