docs: add SECURITY.md security policy documentation#509
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for github-spy ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new SECURITY.md documenting GitHub Tracker’s security policy: supported versions, how to report vulnerabilities responsibly, what to include in reports, disclosure expectations, contributor security guidance, dependency audit commands, and acknowledgements. ChangesSecurity Policy Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Hello @GitMetricsLab 👋 I have added a dedicated
This improves the repository’s security documentation and aligns it with GitHub security policy conventions. Kindly review the PR. Thank you! 🚀 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
SECURITY.md (1)
13-16: ⚡ Quick winMake supported versions explicit by release range/tag.
“Latest
mainbranch” is ambiguous for consumers on published releases. Prefer concrete version lines (for examplev2.x,v1.8+) with support status.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 13 - 16, Update SECURITY.md to replace the ambiguous "Latest `main` branch" row with explicit release tags or ranges (e.g., "v2.x", "v1.8+", or specific semver ranges) and add corresponding support status entries; edit the table header rows (the lines containing "Latest `main` branch" and "Older versions") so they list concrete release identifiers and their support status, and include a short note explaining the support policy (supported range, EOL criteria) for future clarity.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 6-7: Insert a single blank line immediately before the thematic
break `---` in SECURITY.md so the `---` line is not parsed as a setext-style
heading underline by markdownlint (MD003); locate the `---` line and add one
empty line above it to satisfy the linter.
- Around line 36-40: The security contact paragraph currently lists generic
reporting methods but lacks a definitive private contact; update the security
contact section to include a concrete private endpoint (e.g., a dedicated
security email address like security@your-org.com and/or the repository's
private security advisory URL), optional PGP key or Keybase handle for encrypted
reports, and a brief expected response timeframe so reporters know where and how
to submit sensitive vulnerability information securely.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 13-16: Update SECURITY.md to replace the ambiguous "Latest `main`
branch" row with explicit release tags or ranges (e.g., "v2.x", "v1.8+", or
specific semver ranges) and add corresponding support status entries; edit the
table header rows (the lines containing "Latest `main` branch" and "Older
versions") so they list concrete release identifiers and their support status,
and include a short note explaining the support policy (supported range, EOL
criteria) for future clarity.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| Please report vulnerabilities by contacting the maintainers through one of the following methods: | ||
|
|
||
| - Open a private security advisory (if enabled) | ||
| - Contact the repository maintainers directly via GitHub | ||
| - Provide detailed reproduction steps and supporting information |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide a concrete private security contact path.
The policy says “contact maintainers directly via GitHub,” but does not specify a definitive private endpoint (security email, SECURITY advisory URL, or contact form). This can delay reports or cause accidental public disclosure.
Suggested doc update
Please report vulnerabilities by contacting the maintainers through one of the following methods:
- Open a private security advisory (if enabled)
-- Contact the repository maintainers directly via GitHub
+- Email: security@<your-domain>
+- Private advisory: https://github.com/<org>/<repo>/security/advisories/new
- Provide detailed reproduction steps and supporting information📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Please report vulnerabilities by contacting the maintainers through one of the following methods: | |
| - Open a private security advisory (if enabled) | |
| - Contact the repository maintainers directly via GitHub | |
| - Provide detailed reproduction steps and supporting information | |
| Please report vulnerabilities by contacting the maintainers through one of the following methods: | |
| - Open a private security advisory (if enabled) | |
| - Email: security@<your-domain> | |
| - Private advisory: https://github.com/<org>/<repo>/security/advisories/new | |
| - Provide detailed reproduction steps and supporting information |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 36 - 40, The security contact paragraph currently
lists generic reporting methods but lacks a definitive private contact; update
the security contact section to include a concrete private endpoint (e.g., a
dedicated security email address like security@your-org.com and/or the
repository's private security advisory URL), optional PGP key or Keybase handle
for encrypted reports, and a brief expected response timeframe so reporters know
where and how to submit sensitive vulnerability information securely.
|
Addressed the suggested changes. Thanks! |
mehul-m-prajapati
added
level:beginner
type:doc
and removed
level:intermediate
type:accessibility
labels
|
🎉🎉 Thank you for your contribution! Your PR #509 has been merged! 🎉🎉 |
2 participants
Related Issue
Description
Added a dedicated
SECURITY.mdfile to improve the repository's security documentation standards and provide clear guidance for responsible vulnerability disclosure.Changes Made
SECURITY.mdnpm auditHow Has This Been Tested?
Type of Change
Summary by CodeRabbit