Conversation
WalkthroughAdded eager loading of project power data: a left join for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ProjectResolver
participant DB
Client->>ProjectResolver: projectById(id, selectionSet)
ProjectResolver->>ProjectResolver: inspect selectionSet for projectPower
alt projectPower requested
ProjectResolver->>DB: SELECT Project LEFT JOIN project.projectPower WHERE id=...
else
ProjectResolver->>DB: SELECT Project WHERE id=...
end
DB-->>ProjectResolver: Project (with/without projectPower)
ProjectResolver-->>Client: Result
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as CauseRepository.findAllCauses
participant DB
Caller->>DB: SELECT Cause ... LEFT JOIN project.projectPower AS projectPower
DB-->>Caller: Causes with project power data + pagination/filters applied
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/repositories/causeRepository.ts(1 hunks)src/resolvers/projectResolver.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/resolvers/projectResolver.ts (1)
901-903: LGTM: Conditional join for projectPower is correct and scopedThe join is added only when the client requests projectPower, and the alias name aligns with usage elsewhere. No issues spotted.
src/repositories/causeRepository.ts
Outdated
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'projectPower') | ||
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.categories', 'categories') | ||
| .leftJoinAndSelect('project.projectPower', 'projectPower') | ||
| .leftJoinAndSelect('categories.mainCategory', 'mainCategory') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Fix alias collision: both joins use 'projectPower' alias, which will crash the query
TypeORM requires unique aliases per query. Reusing 'projectPower' for both cause.projectPower and project.projectPower will throw a duplicate alias error or produce incorrect mappings.
Refactor to distinct aliases, e.g., reserve 'projectPower' for the project's relation and use a different alias for the cause's relation.
Apply this diff:
- .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'projectPower')
+ .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'causeProjectPower')
...
- .leftJoinAndSelect('project.projectPower', 'projectPower')
+ .leftJoinAndSelect('project.projectPower', 'projectPower')Note: If any downstream filters/orderings reference the 'projectPower' alias in this query, confirm they target the project's power, not the cause's.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
# Locate the repository file
file=$(fd -e ts --hidden causeRepository.ts | head -n 1)
echo "Inspecting file: $file"
# Show lines around the snippet
echo -e "\nLines 310-330:"
sed -n '310,330p' "$file"
# List all leftJoinAndSelect calls involving projectPower
echo -e "\n.leftJoinAndSelect calls with 'projectPower':"
rg -n ".leftJoinAndSelect.*projectPower" "$file"
# Show any other references to the alias 'projectPower'
echo -e "\nAll occurrences of 'projectPower' in the file:"
rg -n "projectPower" "$file"Length of output: 2072
Fix duplicate ‘projectPower’ alias to prevent query failure
The query currently joins two relations with the same alias, which will cause TypeORM to throw a “duplicate alias” error or map data incorrectly. Rename the alias on the cause’s relation to be unique.
• File: src/repositories/causeRepository.ts
– Line 317: change alias for cause.projectPower
– Line 319: preserve alias for project.projectPower
Apply:
- .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'projectPower')
+ .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'causeProjectPower')After renaming, verify any filters or orderings that reference the old alias to ensure they still target the intended relation.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'projectPower') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.categories', 'categories') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('project.projectPower', 'projectPower') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('categories.mainCategory', 'mainCategory') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.projectPower', 'causeProjectPower') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('cause.categories', 'categories') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('project.projectPower', 'projectPower') | |
| .leftJoinAndSelect('categories.mainCategory', 'mainCategory') |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/repositories/causeRepository.ts around lines 317 to 320, the query uses
the same alias 'projectPower' for both cause.projectPower and
project.projectPower which causes a duplicate-alias error; change the alias for
the cause relation to a unique name (e.g., 'causeProjectPower') while leaving
project.projectPower's alias as 'projectPower', then update any
where/orderBy/select references that used the old alias to point to the new
alias so filters and ordering still target the intended relation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/repositories/userRepository.test.ts (2)
55-55: Use describe.skip instead of commenting out a test suiteCommenting out hides the test; skipping keeps it discoverable and reported as skipped.
Apply this diff:
-// describe('isValidEmail test cases', isValidEmailTestCases); +describe.skip('isValidEmail test cases', isValidEmailTestCases);
597-611: Reinstate the test body; remove the no-op assertion; keep it skipped via describe.skipLeaving the whole suite commented-out reduces visibility and erodes coverage. Restoring the suite (while skipped) keeps intent clear and allows easy re-enablement. Also remove the redundant
assert.isTrue(true)in the invalid case.Apply this diff:
-// function isValidEmailTestCases() { -// it('should return true for valid email', async () => { -// const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveth.io`; -// const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); -// assert.isOk(isValid); -// }); -// -// it('should return false for invalid email', async () => { -// assert.isTrue(true); -// const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveeeeth.io`; -// const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); -// assert.isNotOk(isValid); -// }); -// } +function isValidEmailTestCases() { + it('should return true for valid email', async () => { + const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveth.io`; + const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); + assert.isOk(isValid); + }); + + it('should return false for invalid email', async () => { + const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveeeeth.io`; + const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); + assert.isNotOk(isValid); + }); +}If the tests are flaky due to network/DNS/external API checks, I can help replace them with deterministic unit tests using mocks (e.g., nock/sinon) or move them to a separate integration suite. Want me to draft that?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/repositories/userRepository.test.ts(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
| // isValidEmail, | ||
| } from './userRepository'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Avoid commenting out imports; prefer keeping the suite and marking it skipped
This change is unrelated to the PR objective (project power eager loading). If the isValidEmail tests are flaky/blocked, keep them in place and mark them skipped so they remain visible in test reports and aren’t silently dropped.
[suggest_optional_refactor]
Apply this diff to restore the import:
findUsersWhoSupportProject,
- // isValidEmail,
+ isValidEmail,
} from './userRepository';Optionally verify that isValidEmail is still exported and locate its call sites:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify export(s) of isValidEmail and surface call sites for context.
fd -a userRepository.ts | xargs rg -nP -C2 '\bexport\s+(?:async\s+)?function\s+isValidEmail\b|export\s*\{[^}]*\bisValidEmail\b'
rg -nP -C2 '\bisValidEmail\s*\(' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 213
I’ll re-check the export, definition, and call-sites of isValidEmail more broadly:
This will confirm whether isValidEmail even exists or is referenced.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 1. Locate the userRepository.ts file
file=$(fd --extension ts userRepository.ts | head -n1)
echo "Checking in: $file"
# 2. Inspect for any definition or export of isValidEmail in that file
rg -nP 'function\s+isValidEmail\b|isValidEmail\s*[:=]' -C2 "$file"
rg -nP 'export\s*{[^}]*\bisValidEmail\b|export\s+(?:async\s+)?function\s+isValidEmail\b' -C2 "$file"
# 3. Search across all TS/TSX for usage
rg -nP '\bisValidEmail\s*\(' -C2 -g '*.ts*'Length of output: 4588
Restore and Skip isValidEmail Tests
The isValidEmail function remains exported in src/repositories/userRepository.ts and is used elsewhere. Rather than commenting out its import and tests (which silently drops coverage), restore them and mark the suite as skipped so they stay visible in reports.
• In src/repositories/userRepository.test.ts (around lines 20–21):
findUsersWhoSupportProject,
- // isValidEmail,
+ isValidEmail,
} from './userRepository';• Uncomment the existing isValidEmail test cases (around lines 598–609) and wrap them in a skipped suite:
+describe.skip('isValidEmail (flaky)', () => {
it('should return true for valid email', async () => {
const email = `${Date.now()}@giveth.io`;
const isValid = await isValidEmail(email);
assert.isOk(isValid);
});
it('should return false for invalid email', async () => {
const email = `${Date.now()}@giveeeeth.io`;
const isValid = await isValidEmail(email);
assert.isNotOk(isValid);
});
+});This preserves the tests in CI output while acknowledging their instability.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/repositories/userRepository.test.ts around lines 20–21 and 598–609, the
isValidEmail import was commented out and its test cases removed; restore the
isValidEmail import at the top (uncomment it) and re-enable the existing test
cases at lines ~598–609 but wrap them in a skipped suite (e.g., describe.skip or
xdescribe) so the tests remain in the file and CI/test reports while not
running; ensure imports and any references inside those tests are intact so they
compile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts (3)
38-38: Prefer describe.skip (or env-gated describe) to commented-out tests.This keeps the suite discoverable while preventing execution by default.
Apply this diff:
-// describe('isValidEmail() test cases', isValidEmailTestCases); +(RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS ? describe : describe.skip)( + 'isValidEmail() test cases', + isValidEmailTestCases, +);
1181-1196: Revive the test cases behind a gate; avoid nested describe duplication.Uncomment the suite and remove the inner describe. This matches the pattern used elsewhere in this file and keeps the suite grouped by the outer describe you already have.
Apply this diff:
-// function isValidEmailTestCases() { -// describe('isValidEmail() test cases', () => { -// it('should return true for valid email', async () => { -// const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveth.io`; -// const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); -// assert.isTrue(isValid); -// }); -// -// it('should return false for invalid email', async () => { -// const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveeeeth.io`; -// const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); -// assert.isNotOk(isValid); -// }); -// }); -// } +function isValidEmailTestCases() { + it('should return true for valid email', async () => { + const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveth.io`; + const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); + assert.isTrue(isValid); + }); + + it('should return false for invalid email', async () => { + const email = `${new Date().getTime()}@giveeeeth.io`; + const isValid = await isValidEmail(email); + assert.isNotOk(isValid); + }); +}Note: If these tests call external services, consider mocking HTTP (e.g., via nock) to prevent network flakiness and make them safe to run locally and in CI. You can keep them disabled by default with RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS.
32-32: Re-enableisValidEmailimport and gate email-validation tests with an ENV flagWe’ve confirmed
isValidEmailis still exported (src/repositories/userRepository.ts:211) and used in production code. Commenting out the import can lead to bit-rot and hidden failures. Instead, re-enable the import and wrap or skip the test suite based on an explicit environment variable—so the tests remain visible in CI but only run when opted in.• In
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts, restore the import and add a flag:-// import { isValidEmail } from '../repositories/userRepository'; +import { isValidEmail } from '../repositories/userRepository'; +const RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS = process.env.RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS === 'true';• Gate the suite with
describe.skip(or a runtime check):- describe('userResolver email validation', () => { +;(RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS ? describe : describe.skip)('userResolver email validation', () => { // …email‐validation tests… });Setting
RUN_EMAIL_VALIDATION_TESTS=truein your CI or local env will enable these tests; otherwise they’ll be skipped but still reported.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
1 participant
#2073
Summary by CodeRabbit