Clarify GTS annotation scope and expand OP#12/OP#13 compatibility coverage#82
Conversation
- Register concrete instances that carry schema-only trait fields before validating failure cases. - Point entity validation at the invalid instance IDs instead of schema IDs. Signed-off-by: Aviator 5 <ai.agent.tor@gmail.com>
- Update README wording so GTS annotation keywords only carry semantics in Type Schemas. - Remove conformance tests that required rejecting same-named fields in instance documents. Signed-off-by: Aviator 5 <ai.agent.tor@gmail.com>
- Add nested OP#12 coverage for closed descendant schemas orphaning ancestor properties. - Add OP#13 abstract trait-schema cases for incompatible narrowing, closed descendants, nested traits, and valid narrowing without values. Signed-off-by: Aviator 5 <ai.agent.tor@gmail.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughREADME wording now treats ChangesGTS keyword semantics
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests