Skip to content

build(deps): bump lodash from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1 in /ui in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory#395

Merged
intel352 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/ui/npm_and_yarn-52571dc7e9
Apr 5, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump lodash from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1 in /ui in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory#395
intel352 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/ui/npm_and_yarn-52571dc7e9

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 3, 2026

Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /ui directory: lodash.

Updates lodash from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1

Release notes

Sourced from lodash's releases.

4.18.1

Bugs

Fixes a ReferenceError issue in lodash lodash-es lodash-amd and lodash.template when using the template and fromPairs functions from the modular builds. See lodash/lodash#6167

These defects were related to how lodash distributions are built from the main branch using https://github.com/lodash-archive/lodash-cli. When internal dependencies change inside lodash functions, equivalent updates need to be made to a mapping in the lodash-cli. (hey, it was ahead of its time once upon a time!). We know this, but we missed it in the last release. It's the kind of thing that passes in CI, but fails bc the build is not the same thing you tested.

There is no diff on main for this, but you can see the diffs for each of the npm packages on their respective branches:

4.18.0

v4.18.0

Full Changelog: lodash/lodash@4.17.23...4.18.0

Security

_.unset / _.omit: Fixed prototype pollution via constructor/prototype path traversal (GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh, fe8d32e). Previously, array-wrapped path segments and primitive roots could bypass the existing guards, allowing deletion of properties from built-in prototypes. Now constructor and prototype are blocked unconditionally as non-terminal path keys, matching baseSet. Calls that previously returned true and deleted the property now return false and leave the target untouched.

_.template: Fixed code injection via imports keys (GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc, CVE-2026-4800, 879aaa9). Fixes an incomplete patch for CVE-2021-23337. The variable option was validated against reForbiddenIdentifierChars but importsKeys was left unguarded, allowing code injection via the same Function() constructor sink. imports keys containing forbidden identifier characters now throw "Invalid imports option passed into _.template".

Docs

  • Add security notice for _.template in threat model and API docs (#6099)
  • Document lower > upper behavior in _.random (#6115)
  • Fix quotes in _.compact jsdoc (#6090)

lodash.* modular packages

Diff

We have also regenerated and published a select number of the lodash.* modular packages.

These modular packages had fallen out of sync significantly from the minor/patch updates to lodash. Specifically, we have brought the following packages up to parity w/ the latest lodash release because they have had CVEs on them in the past:

Commits
  • cb0b9b9 release(patch): bump main to 4.18.1 (#6177)
  • 75535f5 chore: prune stale advisory refs (#6170)
  • 62e91bc docs: remove n_ Node.js < 6 REPL note from README (#6165)
  • 59be2de release(minor): bump to 4.18.0 (#6161)
  • af63457 fix: broken tests for _.template 879aaa9
  • 1073a76 fix: linting issues
  • 879aaa9 fix: validate imports keys in _.template
  • fe8d32e fix: block prototype pollution in baseUnset via constructor/prototype traversal
  • 18ba0a3 refactor(fromPairs): use baseAssignValue for consistent assignment (#6153)
  • b819080 ci: add dist sync validation workflow (#6137)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition> will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /ui directory: [lodash](https://github.com/lodash/lodash).


Updates `lodash` from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1
- [Release notes](https://github.com/lodash/lodash/releases)
- [Commits](lodash/lodash@4.17.23...4.18.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: lodash
  dependency-version: 4.18.1
  dependency-type: indirect
  dependency-group: npm_and_yarn
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code labels Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 3, 2026

⏱ Benchmark Results

No significant performance regressions detected.

benchstat comparison (baseline → PR)
## benchstat: baseline → PR
baseline-bench.txt:245: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:336222: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:692644: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1023242: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1336941: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1657609: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:245: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:314730: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:633454: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:947372: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1258191: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1600993: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/dynamic
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │       sec/op       │    sec/op      vs base              │
InterpreterCreation-4              3.374m ± 146%   3.288m ± 207%       ~ (p=0.818 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                    3.592m ±   1%   3.689m ±   2%  +2.71% (p=0.002 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                 1.942µ ±   1%   1.955µ ±   1%       ~ (p=0.197 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-1-4         1.086µ ±   1%   1.100µ ±   4%  +1.29% (p=0.041 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-2-4         1.078µ ±   3%   1.095µ ±   1%       ~ (p=0.093 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-4-4         1.078µ ±   1%   1.096µ ±   1%  +1.72% (p=0.002 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-8-4         1.081µ ±   0%   1.094µ ±   1%  +1.25% (p=0.002 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-16-4        1.092µ ±   3%   1.104µ ±  10%       ~ (p=0.121 n=6)
ComponentLifecycle-4               3.634m ±   1%   3.668m ±   0%  +0.93% (p=0.041 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                 2.254µ ±   1%   2.258µ ±   2%       ~ (p=0.320 n=6)
RegistryConcurrent-4               798.3n ±   3%   807.9n ±   4%       ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
LoaderLoadFromString-4             3.629m ±   1%   3.709m ±   1%  +2.21% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean                            17.51µ          17.69µ         +1.02%

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                            │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4               2.027Mi ± 0%   2.027Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.900 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                     2.180Mi ± 0%   2.180Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.420 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                  1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                2.183Mi ± 0%   2.183Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.662 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                  1.984Ki ± 0%   1.984Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                1.133Ki ± 0%   1.133Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4              2.182Mi ± 0%   2.182Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
geomean                             15.25Ki        15.25Ki       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4                15.68k ± 0%   15.68k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                      18.02k ± 0%   18.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                    25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4           25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                 18.07k ± 0%   18.07k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SourceValidation-4                    32.00 ± 0%    32.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                  2.000 ± 0%    2.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4               18.06k ± 0%   18.06k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                               183.3         183.3       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/middleware
                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                  │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 290.7n ± 13%   291.6n ± 7%       ~ (p=0.485 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         22.50n ±  0%   22.53n ± 1%       ~ (p=0.052 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         65.05n ±  2%   65.14n ± 0%       ~ (p=0.615 n=6)
geomean                                   75.22n         75.35n       +0.18%

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 144.0 ± 0%     144.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 1.000 ± 0%     1.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/module
                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base              │
JQTransform_Simple-4                     914.1n ± 23%   880.1n ± 31%       ~ (p=0.937 n=6)
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         1.439µ ±  0%   1.474µ ± 25%  +2.43% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                3.245µ ±  0%   3.341µ ±  2%  +2.94% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_Complex-4                    37.70µ ±  1%   38.63µ ±  1%  +2.47% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 1.763µ ±  1%   1.783µ ±  2%  +1.11% (p=0.002 n=6)
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     71.23n ±  4%   70.47n ±  2%       ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
geomean                                  1.650µ         1.661µ        +0.66%

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                                 │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
JQTransform_Simple-4                   1.273Ki ± 0%     1.273Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4       1.773Ki ± 0%     1.773Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4              2.625Ki ± 0%     2.625Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                  16.22Ki ± 0%     16.22Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4               1.984Ki ± 0%     1.984Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%       0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²                 +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
JQTransform_Simple-4                     10.00 ± 0%     10.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         15.00 ± 0%     15.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                30.00 ± 0%     30.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                    324.0 ± 0%     324.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 17.00 ± 0%     17.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/schema
                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                    │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   1.103µ ± 11%   1.125µ ± 5%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                1.673µ ±  2%   1.661µ ± 2%       ~ (p=0.623 n=6)
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         1.590µ ±  2%   1.577µ ± 1%       ~ (p=0.126 n=6)
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              1.805µ ±  3%   1.806µ ± 2%       ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
geomean                                     1.517µ         1.519µ       +0.14%

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/store
                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base              │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                1.193µ ± 14%   1.140µ ± 15%       ~ (p=0.162 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                  1.342m ±  3%   1.270m ± 15%       ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4           14.72µ ±  5%   14.15µ ±  6%       ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4           82.14µ ±  3%   77.98µ ±  3%  -5.07% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4          165.9µ ±  3%   157.5µ ±  3%  -5.08% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4          673.7µ ± 17%   636.9µ ±  4%  -5.46% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4         1.369m ±  1%   1.294m ±  3%  -5.52% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4             110.1µ ±  1%   107.7µ ±  1%  -2.23% (p=0.009 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4             264.0µ ±  1%   250.6µ ±  1%  -5.10% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4            441.5µ ±  1%   420.5µ ±  1%  -4.77% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4            1.889m ±  3%   1.790m ±  0%  -5.23% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4           3.662m ±  2%   3.494m ±  3%  -4.59% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean                                    233.5µ         222.5µ        -4.74%

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                                   │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                  751.5 ± 7%     815.5 ± 7%  +8.52% (p=0.041 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                  1.985Ki ± 2%   1.985Ki ± 2%       ~ (p=0.866 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4           7.953Ki ± 0%   7.953Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4           46.62Ki ± 0%   46.62Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4          94.48Ki ± 0%   94.48Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4          472.8Ki ± 0%   472.8Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.545 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4         944.3Ki ± 0%   944.3Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4             16.74Ki ± 0%   16.74Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4             87.14Ki ± 0%   87.14Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4            175.4Ki ± 0%   175.4Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4            846.1Ki ± 0%   846.1Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.061 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4           1.639Mi ± 0%   1.639Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.288 n=6)
geomean                                    67.07Ki        67.52Ki       +0.68%
¹ all samples are equal

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                  7.000 ± 0%    7.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                    53.00 ± 0%    53.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4             125.0 ± 0%    125.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4             653.0 ± 0%    653.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4           1.306k ± 0%   1.306k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4           6.514k ± 0%   6.514k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4          13.02k ± 0%   13.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4               382.0 ± 0%    382.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4              1.852k ± 0%   1.852k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4             3.681k ± 0%   3.681k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4             18.54k ± 0%   18.54k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4            37.29k ± 0%   37.29k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                     1.162k        1.162k       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

Benchmarks run with go test -bench=. -benchmem -count=6.
Regressions ≥ 20% are flagged. Results compared via benchstat.

@intel352 intel352 merged commit 0c38778 into main Apr 5, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
@intel352 intel352 deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/ui/npm_and_yarn-52571dc7e9 branch April 5, 2026 03:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant