Skip to content

Cloud-SDK extraction — PR 5: drop in-core azure_blob backend (azure-sdk-for-go leaves go.mod)#675

Merged
intel352 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/cloud-sdk-extraction-p5-core
May 14, 2026
Merged

Cloud-SDK extraction — PR 5: drop in-core azure_blob backend (azure-sdk-for-go leaves go.mod)#675
intel352 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/cloud-sdk-extraction-p5-core

Conversation

@intel352
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

The payoff PR. Deletes the in-core azure_blob IaC state backend now that workflow-plugin-azure v1.1.0 serves it via the IaCStateBackend gRPC contract. Azure/azure-sdk-for-go is dropped from workflow core's go.mod entirely.

  • Task 13 — delete module/iac_state_azure.go (+ its test); strip the case "azure_blob": block + newAzureSharedKeyCredential + the azblob import from module/iac_module.go (the default: arm from the merged Task 8 now resolves azure_blob from the plugin registry); fix the stale supported-backends doc comment. go mod tidy removes sdk/azcore + sdk/storage/azblob (+ transitive). Atomic — one commit, build green.
  • Task 14docs/migrations/2026-05-14-cloud-sdk-extraction.md.

BREAKING: iac.state with backend: azure_blob now requires workflow-plugin-azure ≥ v1.1.0 loaded. The yaml backend: value is unchanged; memory/filesystem/spaces/gcs/postgres are unaffected.

Verification

  • git diff go.mod: azcore + azblob (+ sdk/internal) removed; nothing spurious added.
  • scripts/audit-cloud-symbols.sh --check exit 0 — the azure-sdk-for-go section has zero real imports (comment-only false positives only).
  • Runtime-launch validation, both paths captured: plugin-absent → clean actionable error (unsupported backend "azure_blob" … or load the plugin), no panic; plugin-present (workflow-plugin-azure@v1.1.0 in data/plugins/) → engine loads the plugin, populates the registry, IaCModule.Init constructs a *module.grpcIaCStateStore for azure_blob, server starts clean.
  • go build ./... / go vet ./module/... / go test ./module/ green.

Scope Manifest

PR Count: 8 · Tasks: 19 · Status: Locked 2026-05-14T18:43:55Z
This is PR 5Tasks 13, 14 — branch feat/cloud-sdk-extraction-p5-core. Base main. Depends on PR 4 (workflow-plugin-azure v1.1.0, released) + PR 8 (#674, merged). Final PR of Phase A.

Rollback: revert the commit + go mod tidy restores the in-core backend and re-adds azure-sdk. The two repo-wide pre-existing failures (TestFallbackRuns, TestInfraMultiEnv_E2E) are unrelated — see PR #668.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

intel352 added 2 commits May 14, 2026 16:14
Deletes iac_state_azure.go and strips the azure_blob case +
newAzureSharedKeyCredential from iac_module.go. backend: azure_blob now
resolves an IaCStateBackend gRPC client from workflow-plugin-azure
(>= v1.1.0). go mod tidy removes Azure/azure-sdk-for-go entirely — the
audit script confirms zero azure-sdk references repo-wide.

BREAKING: iac.state with backend: azure_blob now requires
workflow-plugin-azure to be loaded. See docs/migrations.

Rollback: revert this commit + go mod tidy restores the in-core backend
and re-adds azure-sdk to go.mod; smoke-check with an azure_blob config.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 14, 2026 20:18
The in-core azure_blob backend deletion removed Azure/azure-sdk-for-go
from the root module, leaving the example submodule's go.mod/go.sum with
orphaned indirect entries. Tidy removes them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the in-core Azure Blob IaC state backend from workflow core, shifting backend: azure_blob to the external Azure plugin path and dropping Azure SDK dependencies from the root module.

Changes:

  • Deleted the Azure Blob state store implementation and tests.
  • Removed Azure SDK imports/dependencies from iac_module.go, go.mod, and go.sum.
  • Added migration documentation and a regression test for missing-plugin behavior.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
module/iac_state_test.go Adds missing-plugin regression coverage for azure_blob.
module/iac_state_azure.go Deletes the in-core Azure Blob state backend.
module/iac_state_azure_test.go Deletes Azure Blob backend unit tests.
module/iac_module.go Removes Azure Blob construction and updates backend documentation.
go.mod Removes Azure SDK module requirements.
go.sum Removes Azure SDK-related checksums.
docs/migrations/2026-05-14-cloud-sdk-extraction.md Adds migration guidance for Azure Blob backend users.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/migrations/2026-05-14-cloud-sdk-extraction.md:69

  • This YAML example is not accepted by the current config type: requires.plugins decodes into []PluginRequirement, whose entries must be maps with at least a name field. A scalar list item like - workflow-plugin-azure will fail YAML unmarshalling instead of declaring the dependency.
   To declare the dependency without auto-fetch:
   ```yaml
   requires:
     plugins:
       - workflow-plugin-azure
</details>

Comment thread module/iac_module.go
Comment thread module/iac_state_test.go
Comment thread docs/migrations/2026-05-14-cloud-sdk-extraction.md Outdated
Copilot review on #675:
- The unsupported-backend error listed 'azure_blob' among the "use ..."
  suggestions, i.e. it suggested the value that just failed. Reword to
  separate in-core backends from plugin-provided backend guidance.
- Migration doc's requires.plugins example used a scalar list item
  (- workflow-plugin-azure); requires.plugins decodes into
  []PluginRequirement whose entries need a `name:` key. Fixed to map form.
- Sync the doc's quoted error block to the new wording.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 14, 2026

⏱ Benchmark Results

No significant performance regressions detected.

benchstat comparison (baseline → PR)
## benchstat: baseline → PR
baseline-bench.txt:276: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:317155: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:634523: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:914745: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1221151: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1536866: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:276: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:299713: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:642968: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:938676: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1215376: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1542476: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/dynamic
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                            │ baseline-bench.txt │
                            │       sec/op       │
InterpreterCreation-4               7.957m ± 61%
ComponentLoad-4                     3.546m ±  1%
ComponentExecute-4                  1.917µ ±  0%
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.062µ ±  1%
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.079µ ±  2%
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.089µ ±  1%
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.087µ ±  0%
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.096µ ±  2%
ComponentLifecycle-4                3.660m ±  1%
SourceValidation-4                  2.337µ ±  1%
RegistryConcurrent-4                823.4n ±  3%
LoaderLoadFromString-4              3.679m ±  1%
geomean                             18.90µ

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │
                            │        B/op        │
InterpreterCreation-4               2.027Mi ± 0%
ComponentLoad-4                     2.180Mi ± 0%
ComponentExecute-4                  1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.203Ki ± 0%
ComponentLifecycle-4                2.183Mi ± 0%
SourceValidation-4                  1.984Ki ± 0%
RegistryConcurrent-4                1.133Ki ± 0%
LoaderLoadFromString-4              2.182Mi ± 0%
geomean                             15.25Ki

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │
                            │     allocs/op      │
InterpreterCreation-4                15.68k ± 0%
ComponentLoad-4                      18.02k ± 0%
ComponentExecute-4                    25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-1-4            25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-2-4            25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-4-4            25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-8-4            25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-16-4           25.00 ± 0%
ComponentLifecycle-4                 18.07k ± 0%
SourceValidation-4                    32.00 ± 0%
RegistryConcurrent-4                  2.000 ± 0%
LoaderLoadFromString-4               18.06k ± 0%
geomean                               183.3

cpu: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor                
                            │ benchmark-results.txt │
                            │        sec/op         │
InterpreterCreation-4                 4.795m ± 110%
ComponentLoad-4                       3.500m ±   6%
ComponentExecute-4                    1.841µ ±   3%
PoolContention/workers-1-4            1.013µ ±   0%
PoolContention/workers-2-4            1.011µ ±   2%
PoolContention/workers-4-4            1.016µ ±   1%
PoolContention/workers-8-4            1.019µ ±   1%
PoolContention/workers-16-4           1.023µ ±   1%
ComponentLifecycle-4                  3.545m ±   2%
SourceValidation-4                    2.121µ ±   1%
RegistryConcurrent-4                  756.0n ±   4%
LoaderLoadFromString-4                3.857m ±   3%
geomean                               17.33µ

                            │ benchmark-results.txt │
                            │         B/op          │
InterpreterCreation-4                  2.027Mi ± 0%
ComponentLoad-4                        2.180Mi ± 0%
ComponentExecute-4                     1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-1-4             1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-2-4             1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-4-4             1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-8-4             1.203Ki ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-16-4            1.203Ki ± 0%
ComponentLifecycle-4                   2.183Mi ± 0%
SourceValidation-4                     1.984Ki ± 0%
RegistryConcurrent-4                   1.133Ki ± 0%
LoaderLoadFromString-4                 2.182Mi ± 0%
geomean                                15.25Ki

                            │ benchmark-results.txt │
                            │       allocs/op       │
InterpreterCreation-4                   15.68k ± 0%
ComponentLoad-4                         18.02k ± 0%
ComponentExecute-4                       25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-1-4               25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-2-4               25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-4-4               25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-8-4               25.00 ± 0%
PoolContention/workers-16-4              25.00 ± 0%
ComponentLifecycle-4                    18.07k ± 0%
SourceValidation-4                       32.00 ± 0%
RegistryConcurrent-4                     2.000 ± 0%
LoaderLoadFromString-4                  18.06k ± 0%
geomean                                  183.3

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/middleware
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                  │       sec/op       │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                  283.7n ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4          21.48n ± 1%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4          66.31n ± 0%
geomean                                    73.93n

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                  │        B/op        │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 144.0 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                              ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                  │     allocs/op      │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 1.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                              ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

cpu: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor                
                                  │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                  │        sec/op         │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                    311.2n ± 11%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4            22.74n ±  2%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4            71.15n ±  0%
geomean                                      79.56n

                                  │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                  │         B/op          │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                    144.0 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4            0.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4            0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                 ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                  │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                  │       allocs/op       │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                    1.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4            0.000 ± 0%
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4            0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                 ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/module
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                 │       sec/op       │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4              310.2n ± 25%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                   10.19m ±  1%
JQTransform_Simple-4                     667.9n ± 37%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         1.490µ ±  1%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                3.371µ ±  2%
JQTransform_Complex-4                    38.39µ ±  0%
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 1.813µ ±  0%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     63.79n ±  0%
geomean                                  3.838µ

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                 │        B/op        │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4              416.0 ± 0%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                 6.002Mi ± 7%
JQTransform_Simple-4                   1.273Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4       1.773Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4              2.625Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_Complex-4                  16.22Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_Throughput-4               1.984Ki ± 0%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                             ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                 │     allocs/op      │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4              2.000 ± 0%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                  6.840k ± 0%
JQTransform_Simple-4                     10.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         15.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                30.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_Complex-4                    324.0 ± 0%
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 17.00 ± 0%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                             ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

cpu: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor                
                                 │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                 │        sec/op         │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4                 287.0n ±  5%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                      10.03m ± 14%
JQTransform_Simple-4                        666.3n ± 29%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4            1.381µ ±  3%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                   3.369µ ±  1%
JQTransform_Complex-4                       41.20µ ±  4%
JQTransform_Throughput-4                    1.719µ ±  1%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                        64.59n ±  1%
geomean                                     3.770µ

                                 │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                 │         B/op          │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4                 416.0 ± 0%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                    5.838Mi ± 8%
JQTransform_Simple-4                      1.273Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4          1.773Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                 2.625Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_Complex-4                     16.22Ki ± 0%
JQTransform_Throughput-4                  1.984Ki ± 0%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                        0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                 │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                 │       allocs/op       │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4                 2.000 ± 0%
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                     6.861k ± 0%
JQTransform_Simple-4                        10.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4            15.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                   30.00 ± 0%
JQTransform_Complex-4                       324.0 ± 0%
JQTransform_Throughput-4                    17.00 ± 0%
SSEPublishDelivery-4                        0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/schema
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                    │       sec/op       │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   1.094µ ±  2%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                1.649µ ± 10%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         1.587µ ±  1%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              1.833µ ±  3%
geomean                                     1.513µ

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                    │        B/op        │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                    │     allocs/op      │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

cpu: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor                
                                    │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                    │        sec/op         │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                      1.077µ ±  6%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                   1.629µ ± 14%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4            1.572µ ±  5%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4                 1.607µ ±  3%
geomean                                        1.451µ

                                    │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                    │         B/op          │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                      0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                   0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4            0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4                 0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                   ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                    │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                    │       allocs/op       │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                      0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                   0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4            0.000 ± 0%
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4                 0.000 ± 0%
geomean                                                   ¹
¹ summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/store
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                   │       sec/op       │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                1.255µ ± 12%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                  1.948m ±  9%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4           13.24µ ±  2%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4           74.38µ ±  2%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4          144.6µ ± 17%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4          616.7µ ±  1%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4         1.261m ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4             104.4µ ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4             242.6µ ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4            411.3µ ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4            1.762m ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4           3.428m ±  1%
geomean                                    225.2µ

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                   │        B/op        │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                 843.0 ± 11%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                 1.984Ki ±  3%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4          7.953Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4          46.62Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4         94.48Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4         472.8Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4        944.3Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4            16.74Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4            87.14Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4           175.4Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4           846.1Ki ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4          1.639Mi ±  0%
geomean                                   67.71Ki

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │
                                   │     allocs/op      │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                  7.000 ± 0%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                    53.00 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4             125.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4             653.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4           1.306k ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4           6.514k ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4          13.02k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4               382.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4              1.852k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4             3.681k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4             18.54k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4            37.29k ± 0%
geomean                                     1.162k

cpu: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor                
                                   │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                   │        sec/op         │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                   1.183µ ± 13%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                     1.262m ± 12%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4              12.65µ ±  3%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4              63.56µ ± 11%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4             112.5µ ±  1%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4             573.5µ ±  2%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4            1.167m ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4                85.24µ ±  2%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4                221.1µ ±  0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4               383.5µ ±  4%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4               1.673m ±  1%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4              3.290m ±  1%
geomean                                       197.8µ

                                   │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                   │         B/op          │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                     798.0 ± 5%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                     1.983Ki ± 2%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4              7.953Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4              46.62Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4             94.48Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4             472.8Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4            944.3Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4                16.74Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4                87.14Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4               175.4Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4               846.1Ki ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4              1.639Mi ± 0%
geomean                                       67.40Ki

                                   │ benchmark-results.txt │
                                   │       allocs/op       │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                     7.000 ± 0%
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                       53.00 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4                125.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4                653.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4              1.306k ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4              6.514k ± 0%
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4             13.02k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4                  382.0 ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4                 1.852k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4                3.681k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4                18.54k ± 0%
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4               37.29k ± 0%
geomean                                        1.162k

Benchmarks run with go test -bench=. -benchmem -count=6.
Regressions ≥ 20% are flagged. Results compared via benchstat.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 14, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@intel352 intel352 merged commit d179b1a into main May 14, 2026
28 checks passed
@intel352 intel352 deleted the feat/cloud-sdk-extraction-p5-core branch May 14, 2026 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants