refactor: ♻️ API: Move Steam to a dedicated class #158
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ithinkandicode
added
the
refactor / cleanup
ithinkandicode
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As per #153, and as with #156 and #157, this PR moves Steam methods into their own class.
As suggested by @Qubus0 in #153 (here), the Steam methods are inside a directory called
third_partywithinapi, though I've shortened Ste's original suggestion ofthird_party_integrationto keep things clean.Other than what was necessary, there are no functional changes here. I have tested this and confirmed that everything is still working.