-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lighthouse Treemap ☂️ #11254
Comments
reference:
the third child of this d1 node is 91% of the total size, and It'd be pretty involved. Since the files are relatively small, and the main functionality here is to identify opportunities to reduce bundle size, is it worth it?
yeah i'm not happy with how minuscule they look here. but I do like the idea of relative coverage bars. I think in a more realistic bundle, which don't have the property that the second largest file is 1% the size of the largest file, the coverage bar is fine. can you run LH again on this page and see why
hmm... it shouldn't be doing that. am I reading this code wrong? seems correct... behavior you noticed is unexpected. https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/blob/99c47cd/lighthouse-treemap/app/src/main.js#L614
This is so weird. |
@connorjclark is the task state accurate here? What's remaining in treemap that's still P1? |
Fixed the sorting issue. The shading issue I don't see anymore. There are other improvements to be made but its past time to close this tracking issue. |
script-treemap-data
auditView mode: large modulesDesign (Googlers only, sorry): https://gallery.googleplex.com/projects/MCHbtQVoQ2HCZeok9-CasvMb/files/MCFFTHkODMy6RyA6lXJuFGJb
Just one of the mock designs:
Initial proof-of-concept PR: #10312
Branch with these items in various levels of "WIP/Draft" state: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/compare/viewer-treemap-2
ref #10369
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: