Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hey, thanks for asking. The current approach evolved organically from before GCS folders were available and we were forced to use one bucket per state file, to now so it's part part of a super-rational plan.

What we always enforced is IAM separation, which as you observe we now do via GCS folders. Leaving the org-setup state in its own bucket was mainly a way of expressing the criticality of this stage, and also giving users a practical example on how to use both approaches (separate buckets vs folders).

Here too I would go back to our fundamental goal, which is to maintain a toolkit that we expect users to customize and tune to specific requirements. So while we are pretty strict on high…

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@kovagoadam
Comment options

Answer selected by kovagoadam
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants