-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Standardized required_with behavior for write-only fields #14941
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standardized required_with behavior for write-only fields #14941
Conversation
Also converted at_least_one_of + conflicts to exactly_one_of
69a772e to
4166b53
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Breaking Change(s) DetectedThe following breaking change(s) were detected within your pull request.
If you believe this detection to be incorrect please raise the concern with your reviewer. Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_bigquery_data_transfer_config" "primary" {
sensitive_params {
secret_access_key_wo = # value needed
}
}
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 222 Click here to see the affected service packages
🟢 All tests passed! View the build log |
|
TGC failures are unrelated - this PR doesn't modify TGC. Breaking change failure is expected. |
BBBmau
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
NickElliot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
7b15bdc
Clean-up / standardization for write-only fields that requires some small breaking changes. #14933 (comment) for context.
I've gone through and tested the plan errors locally to compare the latest release with these changes.
Note: I believe the bigquerydatatransfer Config change is not breaking, because we already enforce it via a customize diff func. I'm not removing that in this PR to keep things simple.
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)
See Write release notes for guidance.