[cherry-pick]skip SSM repository deletion and improve creation logging#2015
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @cowsking, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request streamlines the end-to-end testing process by preventing the deletion of Secure Source Manager repositories. By making the deletion function a no-op and adding informative logging, the change aims to improve test stability and efficiency, particularly in scenarios where repository names are consistent across test runs. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the DeleteRepositories function for the SSM git provider to be a no-op, aligning its behavior with other providers like GitLab and Bitbucket. This is a good change for test resiliency. I've included one suggestion to improve the logging for skipped deletions to be more informative.
| func (c *SSMClient) DeleteRepositories(_ ...string) error { | ||
| c.shell.Logger.Info("[SSM] Skip deletion of repos") | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better traceability and debugging, consider logging the names of the repositories that are being skipped for deletion. This provides more context than a generic message. While other providers also have a generic log message, improving it here could set a precedent for enhancing them later.
| func (c *SSMClient) DeleteRepositories(_ ...string) error { | |
| c.shell.Logger.Info("[SSM] Skip deletion of repos") | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| func (c *SSMClient) DeleteRepositories(names ...string) error { | |
| if len(names) > 0 { | |
| c.shell.Logger.Infof("[SSM] Skip deletion of repos: %s", strings.Join(names, ", ")) | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tiffanny29631 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
60c3f86
into
GoogleContainerTools:v1.23
No description provided.