Hello, I have reproduced both Transfusion and the PPT (and have correctly processed the data). I found that the results from my training are different each time, and I am unable to achieve the accuracy of the model you provided. Could the issue be due to only using 2D supervision?I have a few images with extremely inaccurate results:
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000647": 178.32215821244446,
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000711": 214.48203716800427,
"s_11_act_10_subact_02_000364": 420.0389947248091,
"s_11_act_10_subact_02_000428": 329.85906022658537,
and these are yours:
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000647": 64.20743666358514,
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000711": 89.07862228210108,
"s_11_act_10_subact_02_000364": 53.7054512754271,
"s_11_act_10_subact_02_000428": 106.18530511204406,
How can I fix this question?Just train for many times and pick a good result?
Hello, I have reproduced both Transfusion and the PPT (and have correctly processed the data). I found that the results from my training are different each time, and I am unable to achieve the accuracy of the model you provided. Could the issue be due to only using 2D supervision?I have a few images with extremely inaccurate results:
and these are yours:
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000647": 64.20743666358514,
"s_09_act_10_subact_01_000711": 89.07862228210108,
How can I fix this question?Just train for many times and pick a good result?